Evaluation of a novel repetitive gas-enhanced permeation test for restoration leakage determination after thermo-mechanical loading

References

• Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13:60D–70D.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botha CT, De Wet FA. Polymerisation shrinkage around composite resin restorations-an in vitro study.. J. Dent. Assoc. S. Afr.1994;49:201–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffiths BM, Naasan M, Sherriff M, Watson TF. Variable polymerisation shrinkage and the interfacial micropermeability of a dentin bonding system. J Adhes Dent1999;1:119–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krejci I, Lutz F. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques. J Dent 1991;19:24–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd EAM. Microleakage: a review. J Dent 1976;4:199–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harper WE. The character of the adaptation of amalgam to the walls of cavities attained by present methods of instrumentation and the use of the best known alloys, as indicated by the air pressure test. Dent Rev 1912;26:1179–98.
   Google Scholar
• Derkson GD, Pashley DH, Derkson ME. Microleakage measurement of selected restorative materials: a new in vitro method. J Prosthet Dent1986;56:435–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunck U, Roulet JF. In vitro marginal quality of dentin-bonded composite resins in Class V cavities. Quintessence Int (Berlin, Germany: 1985) 1989;20:407–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundin SA, Norén JG, Warfvinge J. Marginal bacterial leakage and pulp reactions in Class II composite resin restorations in vivo. Swed Dent J1990;14:185–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc 1972;84:1349–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintze SD, Zimmerli B. Relevanz von In-vitro-Untersuchungen von Adhäsiv-und Kompositmaterialien. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2011;121:1024–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldman M, Laosonthorn P, White RR. Microleakage-full crowns and the dental pulp. J Endod 1992;18:473–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Jadaa A, Attin T, Peltomäki T, Heumann C. Laboratory validation of a new gas-enhanced dentine liquid permeation evaluation system. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:2067–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:953–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raskin A, D'Hoore W, Gonthier S, Degrange M, Déjou J. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:295–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heintze SD. Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation. Dent Mater 2013;29:59–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:9–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintze S, Forjanic M, Cavalleri A. Microleakage of Class II restorations with different tracers-comparison with SEM quantitative analysis. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:259–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiasconaro J, Sherman H. Sealing properties of acrylics. NY Dent J 1952;18:189–93.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard HM, Gayford JJ. Leakage at the margins of amalgam restorations. Br Dent J 1965;119:69–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khvostenko D, Salehi S, Naleway SE, Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, Mitchell JC, Kruzic JJ. Cyclic mechanical loading promotes bacterial penetration along composite restoration marginal gaps. Dent Mater 2015;31:702–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alrahlah A, Silikas N, Watts DC. Hygroscopic expansion kinetics of dental resin-composites. Dent Mater 2014;30:143–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidlin PR, Huber T, Göhring TN, Attin T, Bindl A. Effects of total and selective bonding on marginal adaptation and microleakage of Class I resin composite restorations in vitro. Oper Dent 2008;33:629–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaruba M, Kasper R, Kazama R, Wegehaupt FJ, Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. Marginal adaptation of ceramic and composite inlays in minimally invasive mod cavities. Clin Oral Investig 2013;18:579–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar