Marginal leakage in occlusally loaded, etched, class-II composite resin restorations

References

• Bergenholtz G, Cox C F, Loeshe W J, Syed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11: 439–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davila J M, Gwinnet A J, Robles JC. Marginal adaptation of composite resins and dental bonding agents [Abstract 623]. J Dent Res 1986; 65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakle WS. Effect of thermal cycling on fracture strength and microleakage in teeth restored with a bonded composite resin. Dent Mater 1986; 2: 114–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsten L, Kuusisto E, Ruokolainen R, Udd B. Marginal leakage in vitro of composite fillings in posterior human teeth. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1982; 78: 155–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leinfelder K F, O'Neal S J, Mueninghoff LA. Use of Ca(OH)2 for measuring microleakage. Dent Mater 1986; 2: 121–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torstenson B, Brännström M. Composite resin contraction gaps measured with a fluorescent resin technique. Dent Mater 1988; 4: 238–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusayama T. Factors and prevention of pulp irritation by adhesive composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1987; 18: 633–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordon M, Plasschaert A JM, Saiku J M, Pelzner RB. Microleakage of posterior composite resin material and an experimental urethane restorative material tested in vitro above and below the cementoenamel junction. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 11–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munksgaard E C, Hansen E K, Asmussen E. Effect of five adhesives on adaptation of resin in dentin cavities. Scand J Dent Res 1984; 92: 544–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munksgaard E C, Irie M, Asmussen E. Dentin-poly-mer bond promoted by Gluma and various resins. J Dent Res 1985; 64: 1409–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munksgaard E C, Irie M. Dentin-polymer bond established by Gluma and tested by thermal stress. Scand J Dent Res 1987; 2: 185–90
   Google Scholar
• Munksgaard E C, Hansen E K, Kato H. Wall-to-wall polymerization contraction of composite resins versus filler content. Scand J Dent Res 1987; 95: 526–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen EK. Contraction pattern of composite resins in dentin cavities. Scand J Dent Res 1982; 90: 480–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qvist V. The effect of mastication on marginal adaptation of composite restorations in vivo. J Dent Res 1983; 62: 904–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öysaed H, Ruyter IE. Composites for use in posterior teeth: mechanical properties tested under dry and wet conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 1986; 20: 261–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruyter I E, Öysaed H. Composites for use in posterior teeth: composition and conversion. J Biomed Mater Res 1987; 21: 11–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norén JG, Engström C. Cutting of mineralized hard tissues with the Leitz 1600 low-speed saw microtome. Leitz Mitteilungen 1987; 9: 49–52
   Google Scholar
• Crim GA. Effect of placement techniques on micro-leakage of dentin-bonded composite resin. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 21–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eick J D, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on posterior sensitivity. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 103–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forsten L. Marginal leakage and consistency of the composite resin material in etched cavities. Acta Odontol Scand 1977; 36: 11–3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen EK. Effect of three dentin adhesives on marginal adaptation of two light-cured composites. Scand J Dent Res 1986; 94: 82–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen E K, Asmussen E. Effect of postponed polishing on marginal adaptation of resin used with dentin-bonding agent. Scand J Dent Res 1988; 96: 260–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen K E, Qvist V. Applicering af plast. Tandlaegebl 1987; 91: 546–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Welch F H, Eick DJ. A method to reduce or prevent postoperative sensitivity with posterior composite resin restorations. Quintesscence Int 1986; 17: 667–76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eliades G C, Caputo A A, Vougiouklakis GJ. Composition wetting properties and bond strength with dentin of 6 new dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1985; 1: 170–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hörstedt-Bindslev P. Monkey pulp reactions to cavities treated with Gluma dentin bond and restored with microfilled composite. Scand J Dent Res 1987; 95: 347–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Odén A, Öilo G. Tensile bond strength of dental adhesives. Dent Mater 1986; 2: 207–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darbyshire P A, Messer L B, Douglas WH. Micro-leakage in class II composite restorations bonded to dentin using thermal and load cycling. J Dent. Res 1988; 67: 585–7
   Google Scholar
• Blunck U, Roulet JF. In vitro marginal quality of dentin-bonded composite resins in class V cavities. Quintessence Int 1989; 20: 407–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips R WP. Skinner's science of dental materials. 8th ed. Saunders, Philadelphia 1982
   Google Scholar