Chapter XVI: Summary

Reference

• Abrams M. H. The comparative intelligibility of alternative pronunciations of the numerals »O« thru »9.«. Harvard University. Psycho-Acoustic Laboratory. Sept., 1942; 77744, Report IC-23, PB L
   Google Scholar
• Abrams M. H. Speech in noise: a study of the factors determining its intelligibility. OSRD-4023, 1944;. U. S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D. C 1946; 19805
   Google Scholar
• Acoustical Society of America. Cumulative index to acoustical literature and patents, 1938–1948, listed in the J. acoust. Soc. Amer. American Institute of Physics, New York 1949; vols. 11–20
   Google Scholar
• Adams S. A study of the growth of language between two and four years. J. juv. Res 1932; 16: 269–277
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich C. A. A new test for hearing in the new-born: the conditioned reflex. Amer. J. med. Sci 1927; 174: 360
   Google Scholar
• American Standards Association. Coupler calibration of earphones. Z24. American Standards Association, New York 1949; 9–1949
   Google Scholar
• Baker L. E. The pupillary response conditioned to subliminal auditory stimuli. Psychol. Monogr 1938, No. 3: 50
   Google Scholar
• Bakes F. P. Effect of response to auditory stimulation on the latent time of blocking of the Berger rhythm. J. exp. Psychol 1929; 24: 406–418
   Google Scholar
• Beasley W. C. The national health survey: 1935–1936. Preliminary analysis of audiometric data. Publ. Hlth Rep., Wash., Hearing Stud. Ser 1938, No. 2
   Google Scholar
• Beasley W. C. The national health survey: 1935–1936. Normal hearing by aid and bone conduction. Publ. Hlth Rep., Wash., Hearing Stud. Ser 1938, No. 4
   Google Scholar
• Beasley W. C. The national health survey: 1935–1936. Normal hearing for speech at each decade of life. Publ. Hlth Rep., Wash., Hearing Stud. Ser 1938, No. 5
   Google Scholar
• Beasley W. C. Correlation between hearing loss measurements by air conduction on eight tones. J. acoust Soc. Amer 1940; 12: 104–113
   Google Scholar
• Beasley W. C. The general problem of deafness in the population. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1940; 50: 856–905
   Google Scholar
• Beasley W. C., Rosenwasser H. Determining factors in composing and analyzing speech hearing tests. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1950; 60: 658–679
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bekhterev V. M. General principles of human reflexology. International, New York 1932
   Google Scholar
• Berger H. Über das Elektrenkeplalogramm des Menschen. Arch. Psychiat. Nervenkr 1929; 87: 527–570
   Google Scholar
• Bernard J., Sontag L. W. Fetal reactivity to tonal stimulation: a preliminary report. J. genet. Psychol 1947; 70: 205–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black J. W. Studies in speech intelligibility, a program of war-time research. Effects of voice communication training. Speech Monogr 1946; 13(No. 2)64–68
   Google Scholar
• Black Martha E. 2-A audiometer norms for determining hypoacusia in children between the ages of four and eight. J. Speech Disorders 1939; 4: 3–14
   Google Scholar
• Bloomer H. A simple method for testing the hearing of small children. J. Speech Disorders 1942; 7: 311–312
   Google Scholar
• Bond G. L. The auditory and speech characteristics of poor readers. Teach. Coll. Contr. Educ., No. 657. Columbia University, New York 1935
   Google Scholar
• Bordley J. E., Hardy W. G. A study in objective audiometry with the use of a psychogalvanic response. Ann. Otol., etc., St. Louis 1949; 58: 751–760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breakey M. R., Davis H. Comparisons of thresholds for speech: word and sentence tests; receiver vs. field, and monaural vs. binaural listening. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1949; 59: 236–250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs T. H., Armacost G. H. Results of an oral true-false examination. J. educ. Res 1933; 26: 595–596
   Google Scholar
• Browd V. L. Hearing reeducation without the use of hearing aids. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1949; 49: 511–528
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown J. I. The construction of a diagnostic test of listening comprehension. J. exp. Educ 1949; 18: 139–146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A new »listening-type« examination. AAUP Bull 1950; 36: 304–307
   Google Scholar
• Bryant W. S. A phonographic acoumeter. Arch. Otol, N. Y 1904; 33: 438–443
   Google Scholar
• Buehler C., Hetzer H. Testing children's development from birth to school age. G. Allen, London 1935
   Google Scholar
• Bunch C. C. Methods of testing hearing in infants and young children. J. Pediat 1934; 5: 535–544
   Google Scholar
• Bunch C. C. The development of the audiometer. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1941; 51: 1100–1118
   Google Scholar
• Bunch C. C. Hearing aids. Trans. Amer. Acad. Ophthal. Otolaryng 1942; 46: 163–178
   Google Scholar
• Bunch C. C. Clinical audiometry. Mosby, St. Louis 1943
   Google Scholar
• Caplan D. A. A special report of retardation of children with impaired hearing. Amer. Ann. Deaf 1937; 82: 234–243
   Google Scholar
• Carhart R. Individual differences in hearing for speech. Ann. Otol., etc., St. Louis 1946; 55: 233–266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carhart R. Monitored live-voice as a test of auditory acuity. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1946; 17: 339–349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R. Speech reception in relation to pattern of pure tone loss. J. Speech Disorders 1946; 11: 97–108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carter H. A. Review of methods used for estimation of percentage loss of hearing. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1942; 52: 879–890
   Google Scholar
• Carter H. A. Estimation of percentage loss of hearing. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1943; 15: 87–90
   Google Scholar
• Cemach A. Der objektive Nachweis organischer Taubheit mittels cochlearer Reflexe. Handbuch der Neurologie des Ohres, G. Alexander, O. Marburg. Urban & Schwarzenburg, Berlin-Wien 1924–1929; 4 vols: 871–881, Bd. 1
   Google Scholar
• Chapanis A. Relationships between age, visual acuity and color vision. Hum. Biol 1950; 22: 1–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chesire L., Saffir M., Thurstone L. L. Computing diagrams for the tetrachoric correlation coefficiet. University of Chicago Bookstores, Chicago 1933
   Google Scholar
• Ciocco A. Consistency and significance of tests made with the 4-A audiometer. Publ. Hlth Rep., Wash 1936; 51: 1402–1406
   Google Scholar
• Ciocco A. Audiometric studies of school children: V. Changes in air conduction acuity after an interval of five years, with particular reference to the effect of age and sex. Ann. Otol., etc., St. Louis 1938; 47: 926–937
   Google Scholar
• Ciocco A., Palmer C. E. The hearing of school children: a statistical study of audiometric and clinical records. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child. Develpm 1941; 6(No. 3)
   Google Scholar
• Cornell W. S. Defective hearing and chronic ear disease as revealed by examination of 47,000 Philadelphia school children. Penn. med. J 1940; 43: 678–683
   Google Scholar
• Crowden G. P. The use of the gramophone audiometer. Proc. roy. Soc. Med 1933; 27: 428–444
   Google Scholar
• Crowe S. J., Baylor J. W. The prevention of deafness. J. Amer. med. Ass 1939; 112: 585–590
   Google Scholar
• Crowe S. J., Guild S. R. Impaired hearing for high tones. Acta oto-laryng., Stockh 1938; 26: 138–144
   Google Scholar
• Crowe S. J., Guild S. R., Polvogt L. M. Observations on the pathology of high-tone deafness. Johns Hopk. Hosp. Bull 1934; 54: 315–379
   Google Scholar
• Crowe S. J. Impaired hearing in school children. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1942; 52: 790–804
   Google Scholar
• Curry E. T. A study of the relationship between speech thresholds and audiometric results in perception deafness. J. Speech Hearing Disorders 1949; 14: 104–110
   Google Scholar
• Dahl L. A. Public school audiometry. Interstate, Danville, Illinois 1949
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. The electrical phenomena of the cochlea and the auditory nerve. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1935; 6: 205–215
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. The articulation area and the social adequacy index for hearing. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1948; 58: 761–778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H., Davis P. Action potentials of the brain. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago 1936; 36: 1214–1224
   Google Scholar
• Davis H., Walsh T. E. The limits of improvement of hearing following the fenestration operation. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1950; 60: 273–295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H. Electrical reactions of the human brain to auditory stimulation during sleep. J. Neurophysiol 1939; 2: 500–514
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. The selection of hearing aids. Parts I and II. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1946; 56: 85–115; 135–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis R. C. Motor responses to auditory stimuli above and below threshold. J. exp. Psychol 1950; 40: 107–120
   Google Scholar
• Dean L. W., Bunch C. C. The use of the pitch range audiometer in otology. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1919; 29: 453
   Google Scholar
• Dewey G. Relativ frequency of English speech sounds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1923
   Google Scholar
• Di Carlo L. M. Auditory training for the adult. Volta Rev 1948; 50: 490–496
   Google Scholar
• Dix M. R., Hallpike C. S. The peep-show: a new technique for pure-tone audiometry in young children. Brit. med. J 1947; 2: 719–723
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dix M. R., Hallpike C. S. The peep-show technique for pure tone audiometry in young children. Proc. roy. Soc. Med 1948; 41: 15–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durup G., Fessard A. L'électrencéphalogramme de l'homme: observations psychophy-siologiques relatives à l'action des stimuli visuels et auditifs. Année psychol 1935; 36: 1–32
   Google Scholar
• Durup G., Fessard A. L'électrencéphalogramme de l'homme: données quantitatives sur l'arrêt provoqué par des stimuli visuels ou auditifs. C. R. Soc. Biol, Paris 1936; 122: 756–758
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin S. Hearing acuity of animals as measured by conditioning methods. J. exp. Psychol 1940; 26: 281–298
   Google Scholar
• Egan J. P. Articulation testing methods, II. OSRD-3802, 1944. U. S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D. C 1946; PB 22848
   Google Scholar
• Egan J. P., Hake H. W. On the masking of a simple auditory stimulus. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1950; 22: 622–630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan J. P. Studies on the effect of noise on speech communication. OSRD-2038 1943. U. S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D. C 1946; PB 22907
   Google Scholar
• Elder J. H. Auditory acuity of the chimpanzee. J. comp. Psychol 1934; 17: 157–183
   Google Scholar
• Evans M. L. An adaptation of the audiometric technique for use with young children. Master's thesis abstracted Speech Abstracts, Massachusetts State College, AmherstMass 1944; 4: 20
   Google Scholar
• Ewing A. W. G. Aphasia in children. Humphrey Milford, London 1930
   Google Scholar
• Ewing Irene. Deafness in infancy and early childhood. J. Laryng 1943; 58: 137–142
   Google Scholar
• Ewing Irene, Ewing A. W. G. The ascertainment of deafness in infancy and early childhood. J. Laryng 1944; 59: 309–333
   Google Scholar
• Falconer G. A. The reliability and validity of monitored connected discourse as a test of the threshold of intelligibility. J. Speech Hearing Disorders 1948; 13: 369–371
   Google Scholar
• Falconer G. A., Davis H. The intelligibility of connected discourse as a test for the »threshold for speech.«. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1947; 57: 581–595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler Miriam F. Teachers' problems with hard of hearing children. J. educ. Res 1949; 42: 618–622
   Google Scholar
• Fisher M. S. Language patterns of pre-school children. J. exp. Educ 1932; 1: 70–85
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. U. Mar. 6, 1928, S. Patent No. 1,661,751. Assignor to Western Electric Company. Application filed Nov. 26 1924 Patented
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. U. Some new methods and apparatus for testing the acuity of hearing. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1925; 35: 501–524
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. U. Speech and hearing. Van Nostrand, New York 1929
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. U. Method of calculating hearing loss for speech from an audiogram. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1950; 22: 1–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher H., Steinberg J. C. Articulation testing methods. Bell Syst. Tech. J 1929; 8: 806–854
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. L'acuite visuelle et l'acuite auditive chex les ecoliers. Année psychol 1935; 26: 79–91
   Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P. A method for measuring the percentage of capacity for hearing speech. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1942; 13: 373–382
   Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P. A simple method of measuring percentage of capacity for hearing speech: fundamental factors in setting up a standard. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1942; 36: 874–890
   Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P. Total monaural deafness for speech but not for speech frequencies: misleading threshold audiograms. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1945; 41: 377
   Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P. The percentage of capacity to hear speech, and related disabilities. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1947; 57: 103–113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P. The tests for hearing. Medicine of the ear, E. P. Fowler, Jr. Nelson, New York 1947; 369–422
   Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P., Fletcher H. Three million deafened school children: their detection and treatment. J. Amer. med. Ass 1926; 87: 1877–1882
   Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P., Fletcher H. Three million deafened school children: their detection and treatment; further data. J. Amer. med. Ass 1928; 91: 1181–1184
   Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P., Wegel R. L. Presentation of a new instrument for determining the amount and character of auditory sensation. Trans. Amer. otol. Soc 1922; 16: 105–123
   Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P., Jr. Discovery and evaluation of otic cripples. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1947; 45: 550–561
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• French N. R., Steinberg J. C. Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1947; 19: 90–199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund E. M. Hearing survey, public schools, Albany, New York. N. Y. St. J. Med 1932; 32: 791–796
   Google Scholar
• Freund E. M. School hearing surveys. N. Y. St. J. Med 1939; 39: 1770–1773
   Google Scholar
• Froeschels E. Testing the hearing of young children. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1946; 43: 93–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Froeschels E., Beebe Helen. Testing the hearing of newborn infants. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1946; 44: 710–714
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frotnm Erika O. Study of a case of pseudo deaf-muteness (»psychic deafness«). J. nerv. ment. Dis 1946; 103: 37–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fry D. B., Kerridge Phyllis M. T. Tests for hearing of speech by deaf people. Lancet 1939; 1: 106–109
   Google Scholar
• Gale A. H. The deaf child. Practitioner 1945; 155: 117–124
   Google Scholar
• Gallon F. Whistles for determining the upper limits of audible sound. S. Kensington Conferences 1876. Inquiry into human faculty and its development., F. Galton. Macmillan, New York 1883; 375–378
   Google Scholar
• Gardner M. B. A pulse-tone technique for clinical audiometric threshold measurements. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1947; 19: 592–599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner W. H. Hearing tests in 37 Iowa school systems. Reprint No. 479. Volta Bureau, Washington, D.C. 1937
   Google Scholar
• Gardner W. H. Iowa state program for hard of hearing children. Reprint No. 118. American Society for the Hard of Hearing, Washington, D. C 1938
   Google Scholar
• Gardner W. H. Instructions for conducting audiometer tests. American Society for the Hard of Hearing, Washington, D. C 1940
   Google Scholar
• Gardner W. H. Report of the committee on hard of hearing children of the American Society for the Hard of Hearing for the school. American Society for the Hard of Hearing, Washington, D. C 1938–1939, Reprint No. 128.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner W. H. Report of the committee on hard of hearing children of the American Society for the Hard of Hearing for the school. American Society for the Hard of Hearing, Washington, D. C 1939–1940, Reprint No. 140.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner W. H. The Oregon program for conservation of hearing. Report No. 2. Oregon State Board of Health, Portland 1943
   Google Scholar
• Gardner W. H. Report of committee on hard of hearing children American Hearing Society: for the school year 1947–1948. Hearing News 1950; 18: 5–8
   Google Scholar
• Gates A. I., Bond G. L., Russell D. H. Methods of determining reading readiness. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York 1939
   Google Scholar
• Gesell A., Amatruda Catherine S. Developmental diagnosis. Hoeber, New York 1947
   Google Scholar
• Gesell A., Ilg Frances L., Bullis Glenna. Vision: its development in infant and child. Hoeber, New York 1949
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs F. A., Gibbs E. L. Atlas of electroencephalograph. Cummings Co., Boston 1941
   Google Scholar
• Giese W. J. Test-retest reliability of the 6B audiometer under military conditions. U. S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D. C 1943; 1–688; PB 40741, 1946, Calif. Univ. Div. of War. Res. Rep. No. UCDWR U116; NDRC Rep. No. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Glorig A. Hearing evaluation by low conversational voice tests. Ann. Otol., etc., St. Louis 1949; 58: 394–402
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goetzinger C. P. A consideration of audiometric curves in relation to intelligibility for speech. Amer. Ann. Deaf 1947; 92: 238–250
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldman J. L. A comparative study of whisper tests and audiograms. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1944; 54: 559–572
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow L. D. Significant incidental factors in the measurement of auditory sensitivity. J. gen. Psychol 1946; 35: 33–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guild S. R. Nasopharyngeal irradiation and hearing acuity. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1950; 60: 55–76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guilder Ruth P. Hearing handicaps in children of today. New Engl. J. Med 1942; 227: 619–624
   Google Scholar
• Guilder Ruth P. Audiometric and word test findings: preliminary report. Ann. Otol., etc., St. Louis 1943; 52: 25–33
   Google Scholar
• Guilder Ruth P., Hopkins Louise A. Program for the testing and training of auditory function in the small deaf child during preschool years. Volta Rev 1935; 37: 5–11; 79–84
   Google Scholar
• Gulliksen H. Intrinsic validity. Amer. Psychologist 1950; 5: 511–517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallpike C. S. Hearing aids and hearing tests. Proc. roy. Soc. Med 1934; 27: 424–428
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harms E. A., Malone J. Y. Hearing acuity and stammering. Ann. Otol., etc., St. Louis 1939; 48: 658–662
   Google Scholar
• Harris J. D. Auditory acuity in severe aero-otitis media. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1934; 17: 139–143
   Google Scholar
• Harris J. D. Group audiometry. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1945; 17: 73–76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris J. D. Free voice and pure tone audiometer for routine testing of auditory acuity: studies on comparative efficiency. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1946; 44: 452–467
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartmann A. Eine neue Methode der Hörprufung mit Hülfe electrischer Ströme. Arch. Anat. Physiol., Lpz. Physiol. Abt 1878; 2: 155
   Google Scholar
• May 20, 1944, Harvard University. Psycho-Acoustic Laboratory. Threshold of hearing for words: manual of instructions for auditory test No. 9. Report IC-73
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann A. Threshold of hearing for sentences: manual of instructions for auditory test No. 12. Dec. 20, 1944, Report IC-96
   Google Scholar
• Hawk S. S. Audio-visual perception and reading success. Claremont (Calif.) College Reading Conference Yearb 1947; 135–140
   Google Scholar
• Henry Sibyl. Children's audiograms in relation to reading attainment: I. Introduction to and investigation of the problem. J. genet. Psychol 1947; 70: 211–231
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry Sibyl. Children's audicgrams in relation to reading attainment: II. Analysis and interpretation. J. genet. Psychol 1947; 71: 3–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry Sibyl. Children's audiograms in relation to reading attainments: III. Discussion, summary, and conclusions. J. genet. Psychol 1947; 71: 49–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgard E. R., Marquis D. G. Conditioning and learning. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., New York 1940
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh I. J., Rosenblith W. A., Ward W. D. Masking of clicks by pure tones and bands of noise. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1950; 22: 631–636
   Google Scholar
• Horn E. The commonest words in the spoken vocabulary of children up to and including six years of age. Yearb. Nat. Soc. Stud. Educ 1925; 24(I)185–199
   Google Scholar
• Horn M. D. The 1,003 words most frequently used by Kindergarten children. Childh. Educ 1926; 3: 118–128
   Google Scholar
• Hudgins C. V. Report of the Clarence W. Barron Research Dept. Rep. Clarke Sch. Deaf 1940; 73: 31–36
   Google Scholar
• Hudgins C. V., Hawkins J. E., Ross D. A. The use of a recorded word test for the diagnosis of different types of hearing loss. Harvard University. Psycho-Acoustic Laboratory. June 20, 1944, Report IC-80
   Google Scholar
• Hudgins C. V. The development of recorded auditory tests for measuring hearing loss for speech. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1947; 57: 57–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughson W., Thompson Eva. Correlation of hearing acuity for speech with discrete frequency audiograms. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1942; 36: 526–540
   Google Scholar
• Hughson W., Thompson Eva. Audiometry in the diagnosis and treatment of deafness in children. Ann. Otol., etc., St. Louis 1944; 53: 480–492
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey J. H. Hard of hearing children in the St. Louis public schools. Volta Rev 1929; 30: 644–646; 666
   Google Scholar
• International Kindergarten Union. A study of the vocabulary of children before entering first grade. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1928
   Google Scholar
• Irwin J. V. A battery of tests of speech hearing. Speech Monogr 1948; 15: 133–141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper H. H. Electrical signs of cortical activity. Psychol. Bull 1937; 34: 411–481
   Google Scholar
• Jasper H. H., Shagrass C. Conditioning the occipital alpha rhythm in man. J. exp. Psychol 1941; 28: 373–388
   Google Scholar
• Johnson C. W. A survey of acoustic training programs and accomplishments in the public residential schools for the deaf. Amer. Ann. Deaf 1943; 88: 279–295
   Google Scholar
• Johnston P. W. The Massachusetts Hearing Test. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1948; 20: 697–703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantrow R. W. An investigation of conditioned feeding responses and concomitant adaptive behavior in young infants. Univ. la. Stud. Child Welf 1937; 13(No. 3)
   Google Scholar
• Karlin J. E. Auditory tests of the ability to hear speech in noise. OSRD-3516 1944. U. S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D. C 1946; PB 22847
   Google Scholar
• Kasatkin N. I., Levikova A. M. On the development of early conditioned reflexes and differentiations of auditory stimuli in infants. J. exp. Psychol 1935; 18: 1–19
   Google Scholar
• Keaster Jacqueline. A quantitative method of testing the hearing of young children. J. Speech Disorders 1947; 12: 159–160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keaster Jacqueline. The assessment of hearing loss. Volta Rev 1948; 50: 465–468
   Google Scholar
• Kelley N. H. A comparative study of the response of normal and pathological ears to speech sounds. J. exp. Psychol 1937; 21: 342–352
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy Helen. A study of children's hearing as it relates to reading. J. exp. Educ 1942; 10: 238–251
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon J. S., Knott T. A. A pronouncing dictionary of American English. Merriam, Springfield, Mass. 1944
   Google Scholar
• Riser Bonnie. A demonstration of group audiometer tests. J. Speech Disorders 1940; 5: 151–152
   Google Scholar
• Knott J. R., Henry C. E. The conditioning of the blocking of the alpha rhythm of the human electroencephalogram. J. exp. Psychol 1941; 28: 134–143
   Google Scholar
• Knower F. H., Phillips D., Keoppel Fern. Studies in listening to informative speaking. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol 1945; 40: 82–88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobrak H. G. Beobachtungen des Stapedius Reflexes am Menschen. Z. Hals-Nas.- u. Ohrenheilk 1932; 32: 8–22
   Google Scholar
• Kobrak H. G. The present status of objective hearing tests. Ann. Otol., etc., St. Louis 1948; 57: 1018–1026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobrak H. G., Lindsay J. R., Perlman H. B. Value of reflex contraction of muscles of middle ear as indicator of hearing. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1935; 21: 663–676
   Google Scholar
• Landis C. Psychology and the psychogalvanic reflex. Psychol. Rev 1930; 37: 381–398
   Google Scholar
• Landis C. Electrical phenomena of the skin. Psychol. Bull 1932; 29: 693–752
   Google Scholar
• Landis C., De Wick H. N. The electrical phenomena of the skin. Psychol. Bull 1929; 26: 64–119
   Google Scholar
• Laurer F. A. Hearing survey among a group of pupils of Syracuse schools. Amer. J. Publ. Hlth 1928; 18: 1353–1360
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lempert J., Wever E. G., Lawrence M. The cochleogram and its clinical application. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1947; 45: 61–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lempert J. The cochleogram and its clinical application: concluding observations. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1950; 51: 307–311
   Google Scholar
• Löwenfeld B. Systematisches Studium der Reaktionen der Säuglinge auf Klänge und Geräusche. Z. Psychol 1927; 104: 62–96
   Google Scholar
• Lüscher E. Die Funktion des Musculus stapedius beim Menschen. Z. Hals-Nas.- u. Ohrenheilk 1929; 23: 105–132
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy D. Language development of the pre-school child. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 1930
   Google Scholar
• McCleary R. A. The nature of the galvanic skin response. Psychol. Bull 1950; 47: 97–117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacFarlan D. History of audiometry. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1939; 29: 514–519
   Google Scholar
• MacFarlan D. Speech hearing and speech interpretation testing. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1940; 31: 517–528
   Google Scholar
• MacFarlan D. Speech hearing tests. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1945; 55: 71–115
   Google Scholar
• MacFarlan D. Testing speech-hearing and the efficiency of hearing aids. Ann. Otol., etc., St. Louis 1948; 57: 444–452
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNemar Q. Psychological statistics. Wiley, New York 1949
   Google Scholar
• Marcus R. E., Gibbs E. L., Gibbs F. A. Electroencephalography in the diagnosis of hearing loss in the very young child. Dis. ncrv. Syst 1949; 10: 170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marinesco G., Sager O., Kreindler A. Hysteria et reflexes conditionnels. Rev. neurol 1931; 38: 721–731
   Google Scholar
• Marquis D. P. Can conditioned responses be established in the newborn infant?. J. genet. Piychol 1931; 39: 379–492
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer P. E. Surgical procedures directed toward the prevention of hearing impairment in children. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1949; 49: 1225–1237
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson L. Changes in skin resistance as a result of auditory stimulation. paper reported by title in Progress Report II. Harvard University. Psycho-Acoustic Laboratory., Dec, 1946
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson L. Methods of testing audition in infancy and childhood. paper presented at the 22nd Annual Meeting of the American Speech Correction Association 1946
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson L. A verbal audiometric test for young children. Amer. Psychologist 1947; 2: 291, Abstract
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson L. Some limitations on formulas for calculating speech hearing loss from an audiogram. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1950; 22: 675, (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Miller G. A., Heise G. A. Trill threshold. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1950; 22: 637–638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller G. A., Wiener F. M., Stevens S. S. Transmission and reception of sounds under combat conditions. Summary technical report of Division 17. NDRC, Washington, D. C 1946
   Google Scholar
• Miller G. A. A bibliography in audition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1950
   Google Scholar
• Munson W. A. Trial tests of a pulsing tone audiometer. Research memorandum, Case 20871–2. Bell Telephone Laboratories, New York 1937
   Google Scholar
• Nance Lorna S. Differential diagnosis of aphasia in children. J. Speech Disorders 1946; 11: 219–223
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neet C. C. A comparison of verbal, manual and conditioned response methods in the determination of auditory intensity thresholds. J. exp. Psychol 1936; 19: 401–416
   Google Scholar
• Newby H. A. Group pure-tone hearing testing in the public schools. J. Speech Disorders 1947; 12: 357–362
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newhart H. Hearing deficiencies in relation to speech defects. J. Speech Disorders 1938; 3: 247–252
   Google Scholar
• Newhart H. A new pure-tone audiometer for school use. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1938; 28: 777–779
   Google Scholar
• Newhart H. Progress in the conservation of hearing. Trans. Amer. otol. Soc 1940; 30: 16–26
   Google Scholar
• Newhart H., Reger S. N. Syllabus of audiometric procedures in the administration of a program for the conversation of hearing in school children. Trans. Amer. Acad. Ophthal. Otolaryng Apr., 1945, Supplement
   Google Scholar
• Nice M. M. Speech development of a child from eighteen months to six years. Pedagogical Seminary 1917; 24: 204–243
   Google Scholar
• Nielson S. F. Tonaudiometermethode zur Gruppenuntersuchung des Gehors der Schulkinder. Acta oto-laryng., Stockh 1944; 32: 263–283
   Google Scholar
• Osborn C. D. Medical follow-up of hearing tests. J. Speech Disorders 1945; 10: 261–273
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Partridge R. C., MacLean D. L. A survey of hearing in school children. Canad. publ. Hlth J 1933; 24: 524–529
   Google Scholar
• Pavlov I. P. The scientific investigation of the psychical faculties or processes in the higher animals. Science 1906; 24: 613–619
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson G. E. The pure tone screen test of hearing. J. Speech Disorders 1944; 9: 114–120
   Google Scholar
• Popov N. A. Contribution à l'étude des réflexes conditionnés par la méthode électroence-phalographique: I. Fonction des réflexes conditionnes (area parietalis). C. R. Soc. Biol., Paris 1948; 142: 214–216
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Postman L., Bruner J. S., McGinnies E. Personal values as selective factors in perception. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol 1948; 83: 142–153
   Google Scholar
• Poulos T. H. Acuity and perceptive accuracy of monaural and binaural hearing. Volta Rev 1950; 52: 314–316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince J. W. The effect of impaired hearing at various frequencies on grades and citizenship. J. educ. Res 1948; 42: 234–237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor D. F., Willard W. R. Washington County (Maryland) program for the prevention of deafness in children. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1946; 43: 462–472
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pronko N. H. An experiment in the pursuit of »color-blindness.». J. genet Psychol 1949; 74: 125–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razran G. Conditioned responses in children: a behavioral and quantitative critical review of experimental studies. Arch. Psycbol., N. Y 1933; 23(No. 148)
   Google Scholar
• Razran G. Conditioned responses: a classified bibliography. Psychol. Bull 1937; 34: 191–256
   Google Scholar
• Reger S. N., Newby H. A. A group pure tone hearing test. J. Speech Disorders 1947; 12: 61–66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reymert M. L., Rotman M. Auditory changes in children from ages ten to eighteen. J. genet. Psychol 1946; 68: 181–187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinsland H. D. A basic vocabulary of elementary school children. Macmillan, New York 1945
   Google Scholar
• Rodin F. H. Conservation of hearing and the hard of hearing child. Calif. West. Med 1927; 27: 643–647
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodin F. H. Survey of the hearing of the school children of San Francisco. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1930; 11: 463–474
   Google Scholar
• Rossell B. Hearing impairment in school children. N.Y. St. J. Med 1933; 33: 1387–1389
   Google Scholar
• Saltzman M., Ersner M. S. Masking as an aid in audiometry in children. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1948; 58: 1127–1130
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seashore C. E. An audiometer. Univ. la. Stud. Psychol 1899; 2: 158–163
   Google Scholar
• Severson Ingebord. A report on the hearing conservation program. Special Education Review 1945; 3: 20–22
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan Mary D. High-tone deafness in school-children simulating mental defect. Brit. med. J 1944; 2: 272
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheridan Mary D. The child's hearing for speech. Methuen, London 1938
   Google Scholar
• Shilling C. W., Everley I. A., Harris J. D. Hearing tests: an evaluation. Nav. med. Bull., Wash 1945; 44: 110–116
   Google Scholar
• Sims V. M., Know K. B. The reliability and validity of multiple response tests when presented orally. J. educ. Psychol 1932; 23: 656–662
   Google Scholar
• Sivian L. J., White S. D. On minimum audible sound fields. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1933; 4: 288–321
   Google Scholar
• Sjöström L. On rendering hearing tests by speech homogeneous. Acta oto-laryng., Stokh 1949; 37: 253–255
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith Madorah E. An investigation of the development of the sentence and the extent of vocabulary in young children. Univ. la. Stud. Child Welf 1926; 3(No. 5)
   Google Scholar
• Spelt D. K. Conditioned responses in the human fetus in utero. Psycbol. Bull 1938; 35: 712–713
   Google Scholar
• Sprunt Julie W., Finger F. W. Auditory deficiency and academic achievement. J. Speech Hearing Disorders 1949; 14: 26–32
   Google Scholar
• Steer M. D. Speech intelligibility in naval aviation. J. Speech Disorders 1945; 10: 215–219
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg G. Praktische Erprobung des Käu flicken Apparaten zusammengestellenten Audiometers. Z. Hals-Nas- u. Ohrenheilk 1937; 43: 133
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg J. C., Gardner M. B. On the auditory significance of the term hearing loss. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1940; 11: 270–277
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg J. C., Montgomery H. C., Gardner M. B. Results of the World's Fair hearing tests. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1940; 12: 290–301
   Google Scholar
• Sterling E. B., Bell E. Hearing of school children. Publ. Hlth Rep., Wash 1930; 145: 1117–1130
   Google Scholar
• Stern W. Psychology of early childhood. G. Allen, London 1924
   Google Scholar
• Stevens S. S. Increased intelligibility gained by extending the response of an earphone to 4000 cycles per second. Harvard University. Psycho-Acoustic Laboratory. Apr., 1942, Report IC-23
   Google Scholar
• Stevens S. S., Davis H. Hearing: its psychology and physiology. Wiley, New York 1938
   Google Scholar
• Stevens S. S. Articulation testing methods, including word lists for the testing of communication systems. OSRD-383 1942. U. S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D. C 1946; PB 22916
   Google Scholar
• Strauss H., Landis C., Hunt W. A. Acoustic motor reactions, especially the cochleopalpebral reflex. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1938; 28: 941–945
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs E. M. The effect of the factors of duration, intensity, and pitch of sound stimuli on the responses of newborn infants. Univ. la. Stud. Child. Welf 1934; 9(No. 4)75–135
   Google Scholar
• Stump N. F. Oral versus printed method in the presentation of the true false examination. J. educ. Res 1928; 18: 423–424
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan J. A. A. statistical analysis of audiometric surveys in the Royal Canadian Air Force. Ann. Otol., etc., St. Louis 1946; 55: 839–858
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tato J. M. Electro-encephalogic auditive threshold. Acta otolaryng., Stokh 1948; 151–155, Suppl. 78
   Google Scholar
• Templin M. C. A comparison of the spelling achievement of normal and defective hearing subjects. J. educ. Psychol 1948; 39: 337–346
   Google Scholar
• Ten Cate J. Die Pupillenerweiterungen auf akustische Reize. Arch, néerl. Physiol 1934; 19: 408–416
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike E. L. The teacher's word book. Columbia University Press, New York 1931
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike R. L. Personnel selection: test and measurement techniques. Wiley, New York 1949
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow W. R. A statistical study of auditory tests in relation to the fenestration operation. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1948; 58: 43–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurlow W. R. Further statistical study of auditory tests in relation to the fenestration operation. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1949; 59: 113–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunturi A. R. Physiological determination of the boundary of the acoustic area in the cerebral cortex of the dog. Amer. J. Physiol 1950; 160: 395–401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger M. Objective measurement of hearing. Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago 1939; 29: 621–623
   Google Scholar
• Utley Jean. The relation between speech sound discrimination and percentage of hearing loss. J. Speech Disorders 1944; 9: 103–113
   Google Scholar
• Vanderplas J. M., Blake R. R. Selective sensitization in auditory perception. J. Personality 1949; 18: 252–266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman J. L., Wade F. A., Aretz C. W. Hearing and the school child. Volta Bureau, Washington, D. C, Philadelphia 1930
   Google Scholar
• Wallin Virginia S., Wallin Wallace J. E. An investigation of the acuteness of hearing of children in the Delaware public schools by means of the 4-A audiometer (phono-audiometer). Division of Special Education and Mental Hygiene, Board of Education, Wilmington, Delaware 1942
   Google Scholar
• Warwick H. L. Hearing tests in the public schools of Fort Worth. Volta Rev 1929; 30: 641–643
   Google Scholar
• Watson L. A. Why and how to conduct hearing tests. Maico Co., n.d., Minneapolis
   Google Scholar
• Watson L. A., Tolan T. Hearing tests and hearing instruments. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1949
   Google Scholar
• Webber Vera, Hunnicutt C. W. Children's ability to perceive change in color in painting. Elem. Sch. J 1948; 48: 494–497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster J. C., Himes H. W., Lichtenstein M. San Diego County Fair hearing survey. J. acoust. Soc. Amer 1950; 22: 473–482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger M. A. An investigation of conditioned responses in human infants. Univ. la. Stud. Child Well 1936; 12: 7–90
   Google Scholar
• West R. A critique of the rationale of tests of hearing. J. Speech Disorders 1940; 5: 19–24
   Google Scholar
• Western Electric Co. 6A audiometer. Instruction Bull. No. 841. Western Electric Co., New York, n.d.
   Google Scholar
• West R. 4C audiometer. Instruction Bull. No. 938P. Western Electric Co., New York, n.d.
   Google Scholar
• Westlake H. Hearing acuity in young children. J. Speech Disorders 1942; 7: 7–14
   Google Scholar
• Westlake H. Meet the needs of the acoustically handicapped. Bull. 421. Dept. of Publ. Instruction, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg 1944
   Google Scholar
• Wever E. G. Theory of hearing. Wiley, New York 1949
   Google Scholar
• Wickens D. D., Wickens C. A study of conditioning in the neonate. J. exp. Psychol 1940; 26: 94–102
   Google Scholar
• Williams H. M. An audiometric test for young children. Child Develpm 1931; 2: 237–241
   Google Scholar
• Witting E. G., Hughson W. Inherent accuracy of a series of repeated clinical audiograms. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1940; 50: 259–269
   Google Scholar
• Zener Karl. Interrelationships between perception and personality: a symposium. J. Personality 1949; 18: 1–270
   Google Scholar