XI References

References

• Antonelli A. R., Calearo C., DeMitri T. La function auditive dans la pathologie du tronc cérébral. Int. Audiol. 1963a; 2: 55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli A. R., Calearo C., DeMitri T. Reperti audiometrici nelle lesioni del tronco dell'encefalo. Boll. Soc. Ital. Fonetica 1963b; 12: 19
   Google Scholar
• Arnold G. E. Die Untersuchung zentraler Hörstörungen mit neuen Hörprüfungs-methoden. Arch. Ohr. Nas. Kehlkopjheilk. 1951; 157: 521
   Google Scholar
• Arnold H. D. 1929, Cited by Fletcher, H.
   Google Scholar
• von Békésy G. Zur Theorie des Hörens. Physik. Z. 1929; 30: 721
   Google Scholar
• Beranek L. L. The design of speech communication systems. Proc. I. R. E. 1947; 35: 880
   Google Scholar
• Bloch E. Das binaurale Hören. Z. Ohrenheilk. 1893; 24: 25
   Google Scholar
• Bocca E. Binaural hearing: another approach. Laryngoscope 1955; 65: 1164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bocca E. Fisiologia, fisiopatologia e diagnostica clinica delle sordita retrococleari. Idos, Milano 1956
   Google Scholar
• Bocca E. Evolución del concepto de presbiacusia. An. Fonol. Audiol. 1957; 3: 32
   Google Scholar
• Bocca E. Clinical aspects of cortical deafness. Laryngoscope 1958; 68: 301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bocca E. 1960, Cited by Bocca, E., and Calearo, C., 1963
   Google Scholar
• Bocca E. Factors influencing binaural integration of periodically switched message. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1961; 53: 142
   Google Scholar
• Bocca E., Calearo C. Central hearing processes. Modern developments in audiology, J. Jerger. Acad. Press, New York and London 1963
   Google Scholar
• Bocca E., Calearo C., Cassinari V. A new method for testing hearing in temporal lobe tumours. Preliminary report. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1954; 44: 219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocca E., Calearo C., Cassinari V. La surdité corticale. Rev. Laryng. (Bordeaux) 1957; 78: 777
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bocca E., Calearo C., Cassinari V., Migliauacca F. Testing «cortical» hearing in temporal lobe tumours. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1955; 45: 289
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bocca E., Camisasca L. Studi sull'inerzia dell'apparato uditivo. Arch. Ital. Otol 1950, Suppl. 5: 142
   Google Scholar
• Bocca E., Finzi A. Statistical error in speech perception under conditions of experimental distortion. Proc. 5th Int. Congr. Otorhinolaryng. Amsterdam 1953, 1953
   Google Scholar
• Bocca E., Pellegrini A. Possibilità di calcolare il deficit di percezione della voce in base alla soglia uditiva per i toni puri. Arch. Ital. Otol. 1950, Suppl. 5: 103
   Google Scholar
• Bocca E., Pellegrini A. Studies of the perception of the distorted voice. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1951; 39: 473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordley J. E., Haskins H. L. The role of cerebrum in hearing. Ann. Otol. 1955; 64: 370
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent D. E. The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. J. Exp. Psychol 1954; 47: 191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broadbent D. E. Successive responses to simultaneous stimuli. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 1956; 8: 145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent D. E. Immediate memory and simultaneous stimuli. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 1957; 9: 1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent D. E., Ladefoged P. On the fusion of sounds reaching different sense organs. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1957; 29: 708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunetti F. Modifications de l'adaptation auditive d'origine centrale par interférences sensorielles. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1961; 53: 145
   Google Scholar
• Calearo C. Detection of malingering by periodically switched speech. Laryngoscope 1957a; 67: 130
   Google Scholar
• Calearo C. Binaural summation in lesions of the temporal lobe. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1957b; 47: 392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calearo C. 1960, Cited by Bocca, E., and Calearo, C., 1963
   Google Scholar
• Calearo C., Antonelli A. R. «Cortical» hearing tests and cerebral dominance. Acta Otolaryng (Stockh.) 1963; 56: 17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calearo C., Lazzaroni A. Speech intelligibility in relation to the speed of message. Laryngoscope 1957; 67: 410
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Carlo L. M., Brown W. The effectiveness of binaural hearing for adults with hearing impairments. J. Auditory Res. 1960; 1: 35
   Google Scholar
• Caussé R., Chavasse P. Difference entre l'écoute binauriculaire et monauriculaire pour la perception des intensités supraliminaires. C. R. Soc. Biol. (Paris) 1942; 136: 405
   Google Scholar
• Chappel R. C., Kavanagh J. F., Zerlin S. Monaural versus binaural discrimination for normal listeners. J. Speech Hearing Res. 1963; 6: 263
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherry E. C. Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1953; 25: 975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry E. C., Taylor W. K. Some further experiments upon the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1954; 26: 554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chocholle R. Étude statistique des seuils auditifs monauraux et binauraux interpretation des résultats. Acustica 1954a; 4: 341
   Google Scholar
• Chocholle R. Les temps de réaction; leur utilisation possible en audiologie. Ann. Otolaryng. (Paris) 1954b; 71: 379
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chocholle R. La sensibilité auditive différentielle d'intensité en présence d'un son contralatéral de měme fréquence. Acustica 1957; 7: 75
   Google Scholar
• Chocholle R. Le seuil dü'férentiel d'intensité en présence d'un son contralatéral de fréquence différente. Acustica 1959; 9: 309
   Google Scholar
• Christian W., Röser D. Ein Beitrag zum Richtungshören. Z. Laryng. Rhinol. Otol. 1957; 36: 431
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cramér H. Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton 1945
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. The articulation area and the social adequacy index for hearing. Laryngoscope 1948; 58: 761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deatherage B. H., Eldredge D. H., Davis H. Latency of action potentials in the cochlea of the guinea pigs. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1959; 31: 479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deatherage B. H., Hirsh I. J. Auditory localization of clicks. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1959; 31: 486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn H. K., White S. D. Statistical measurements on conversational speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1940; 11: 278
   Google Scholar
• Egan J. P. Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope 1948; 58: 955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan J. P., Wiener F. M. On the intelligibility of bands of speech in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1946; 18: 435
   Google Scholar
• Fairbanks G., Guttman N., Miron M. S. Effects of time compression upon the comprehension of connected speech. J. Speech Hearing Dis. 1957; 22: 10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fant C. G. M. Analys av de svenska vokal- ach konsonantljuden. 1948, Internal Report L. M. Ericsson.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman H. Untersuchungen zur Discrimination differenter Schallbilder bei simultaner, monauraler und binauraler Darstellung. Arch. Ohr. Nas. Kehlkopfheilk. 1960; 176: 601
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feldman H. Binaural hearing-test. Int. Audiol. 1962; 1: 222
   Google Scholar
• Feldman H. Untersuchungen über das binaurale Hören unter Einwirkung von Störgeräusch. Ein Beitrag zur Zentralnervösen Verarbeitung akustischer Informationen. Arch. Ohr. Nas. Kehlkopfheilk. 1963; 181: 337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feldman H. Dichotischer Discrirninationstest, eine neue Methode zur Diagnostik zentraler Hörstörungen. Arch. Ohr. Nas. Kehlkopfheilk. 1965; 184: 294
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finzi A. Il comportamento della soglia di intellezione dei giovani con ipoacusia percettiva e dei presbiacusici verso tests audiometrici vocali sensibilizzati. Arch. Ital. Otol 1956; 67: 697
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fletcher H. New York 1929, Speech and hearing. D. Van Nostrand
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. Method of calculating hearing loss for speech from an audiogram. Acta Otolaryng. 1950, Suppl. 90: 26
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. Speech and hearing in communication. D. Van Nostrand, New York, Toronto, London 1961
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H., Galt R. H. Perception of speech and its relation to telephony. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1950; 22: 89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher H., Munson W. A. Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1933; 5: 82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers A., Costello M. R. Responses to distorted speech of children with severe articulation disorders. J. Auditory Res. 1963; 3: 133
   Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P. A simple method of measuring percentage of capacity for hearing speech. Arch. Otolaryng. (Chic.) 1942; 36: 874
   Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P. Symposium on noise. The percentage of capacity to hear speech, and related disabilities. Laryngoscope 1947; 57: 103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French N. R., Steinberg J. C. Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1947; 19: 90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry D. B. Modifications to speech audiometry. Int. Audiol. 1964; 3: 226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gage F. H. A note on the binaural threshold. Br. J. Psychol 1932; 23: 148
   Google Scholar
• Garvey W. D. The intelligibility of speeded speech. J. Exp. Psychol 1953; 45: 102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giolas T. G. An investigation of the effects of frequency distortion upon the intelligibility of monosyllabic word lists and a sample of continuous discourse. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburg. 1959
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein R. Hearing and speech in follow-up of left hemispherectomy. J. Speech Hearing Dis. 1961; 26: 126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldstein R. Electrophysiologic audiometry. Modern developments in audiology, J. Jerger. Acad. Press, New York and London 1963
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein R., Goodman A., King R. B. Hearing and speech in infantile hemiplegia before and after left hemispherectomy. Neurology (Minneap.) 1956; 6: 869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman A. C. Paradoxal lateralization of sound. Laryngoscope 1963; 73: 1697
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greiner G. F., Conraux C., Herbein R. La localisation spatiale du son par l'épreuve de Matzker. Confin. Neurol. 1963; 23: 343
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greiner G. F., Lafon J. C. La distorsion spatiale du test phonétique dans des dyslexies sans surdités tonales et son utilisation dans le dépistage des surdités corticales. Ann. Otolaryng. (Paris) 1957; 74: 400
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greiner G. F., Lafon J. C., Mengus M. Recherches sur les troubles de l'intégration phonétique dans quelques cas de lesion temporale. Rev. Otoneuroophtal 1957; 29: 458
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Groen J. J. Vestibular and audiological aspects of two cases of hemispherectomy. Pract. oto-rhino-laryng. 1963; 25: 119
   Google Scholar
• Groen J. J., Hellema A. C. M. Binaural speech audiometry. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1960; 52: 397
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Groen J. J., Hellema A. C. M. On the diagnosis of central deafness in children. Int. Audiol. 1963; 2: 103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahlbrock K. H. Sprachaudiometrie. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1957
   Google Scholar
• Hahn R. Phénomènes d'interférence centrale et d'intégration binauriculaire pour des tons de longue durée. Int. Audiol. 1963; 2: 38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakulinen P. Suomen kielen rakenne ja kehitys. Otava, Helsinki 1941
   Google Scholar
• Harris J. D. Research frontiers in audiology. Modern developments in audiology, J. Jerger. Acad. Press, New York and London 1963
   Google Scholar
• Harris R. Central auditory functions in children. Percept. Motor Skills 1963; 16: 207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins J. E., Stevens S. S. The masking of pure tones and speech by white noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1950; 22: 6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennebert D. L'intégration de la perception auditive et l'audition alternante. Acta Otorhinolaryng. Belg. 1955; 9: 344
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirsh I. J. Binaural summation. A century of investigation. Psychol. Bull. 1948a; 45: 193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh I. J. Binaural summation and interaural inhibition as a function of the level of masking noise. Amer. J. Psychol. 1948b; 61: 205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirsh I. J. The influence of interaural phase on interaural summation and inhibition. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1948c; 20: 536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh I. J., Davis H., Silverman S. R., Reynolds E. G., Eldert E., Benson R. W. Development of material for speech audiometry. J. Speech Hearing Dis. 1952; 17: 321
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirsh I. J., Pollack I. The role of interaural phase in loudness. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1948; 20: 761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh I. J., Reynolds E. G., Joseph M. Intelligibility of different speech materials. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1954; 26: 530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudgins C. V., Hawkins J. E., Karlin J. E., Stevens S. S. The development of recorded auditory tests for measuring hearing loss for speech. Laryngoscope 1947; 57: 57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes J. W. The monaural threshold: effect of a subliminal contralateral stimulus. Proc. Roy. Soc. Biol. Ser. B 1938; 124: 406
   Google Scholar
• Hughes J. W. The monaural threshold: effect of subliminal and audible contralateral and ipsilateral stimuli. Proc. Roy, Soc. Biol. Ser. B. 1940; 128: 144
   Google Scholar
• Huizing H. C., Taselaar M. Experiments on binaural hearing. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1961; 53: 151
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Inglis A. H. Transmission features of the new telephone sets. Bell Syst. Techn. J. 1938; 17: 358
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J. Observations on auditory behavior in lesions of the central auditory pathways. Arch. Otolaryng. (Chic.) 1960; 71: 797
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Carhardt R., Dirks D. Binaural hearing aids and speech intelligibility. J. Speech Hearing Res. 1961; 4: 137
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J., Mier M., Boshes B., Canter G. Auditory behavior in parkinsonism. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1960; 52: 541
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kainz F. Psychologic der Sprache. Ferd. Enke Verlag, Stuttgart 1954; Band III
   Google Scholar
• Katz J. The use of staggered spondaic words for assessing the integrity of the central auditory nervous system. J. Audiotory Res. 1962; 2: 327
   Google Scholar
• Katz J., Basil R. A., Smith J. M. A staggered spondaic word test for detecting central auditory lesions. Ann. Otol. 1963; 72: 908
   Google Scholar
• Kemp E. H., Robinson E. H. Electrical responses of the brain stem to bilateral auditory stimulation. Amer. J. Physiol. 1937; 120: 316
   Google Scholar
• Keys J. W. Binaural vs. monaural hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1947; 19: 629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura D. Some effects of temporal lobe damage on auditory perception. Canad. J. Psychol. 1961a; 15: 156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canad. J. Psychol. 1961b; 15: 166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirikae I., Sato S., Shitara T. A study of hearing in advanced age. Laryngoscope 1964; 74: 205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klumpp R. G., Webster J. C. Intelligibility of time-compressed speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1961; 33: 265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig W. Subjective effects in binaural hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1950; 22: 61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kryter K. D. Effect of ear protective devices on the intelligibility of speech in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1946; 18: 413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtzrock G. The effects of time and frequency distortion upon word intelligibility. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Illinois. 1956
   Google Scholar
• Kyttä J. Finnish oesophageal speech after laryngectomy. Sound spectrographic and cineradiographic studies. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1964, Suppl. 195
   Google Scholar
• Lambert J. D. The effect of frequency filtering on consonant recognition. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Purdue. 1954
   Google Scholar
• Langenbeck B. Leitfaden der praktischen Audiometrie. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1952
   Google Scholar
• Langenbeck B. Lehrbuch der praktischen Audiometrie. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1963, Lafon, J. C., 1957 a: La distortion de la perception des phonemes. Rev. Laryng., 78, 239
   Google Scholar
• Langenbeck B. L'audiométrie vocale qualitative. Acta Otorhinolaryng. Belg. 1957b; 11: 86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lafon J. C., Morgan A., Brissot A. Test de mesure des difficultés d'intégration phonétique de l'enfant. Int. Audiol. 1963; 2: 94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRoux F. P. 1875, Cited by Hirsh, I. J., 1948 a
   Google Scholar
• Licklider J. C. R. The influence of interaural phase relations upon the masking of speech by white noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1948; 20: 150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licklider J. C. R. Basic correlates of the auditory stimulus. Handbook of experimental psychology, S. S. Stevens. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York 1951
   Google Scholar
• Licklider J. C. R., Miller G. A. The perception of speech. Handbook of experimental psychology, S. S. Stevens. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York 1951
   Google Scholar
• Lindén A. Talaudiometri med frekvensdistortion och binauralt hörselsyntesprov. En studie av två talaudiometrimetoder med svenskt ordmaterial. Göteborg. 1960
   Google Scholar
• Lindén A. Distorted speech and binaural speech resynthesis tests. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1964; 58: 32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lochner J. P. A., Burger J. F. The binaural summation of speech signals. Acustica 1961; 11: 313
   Google Scholar
• Lucas A. Neue Möglichkeiten der Nutzung transitorischer Phänomene für die Differentialdiagnose der Schallempfindungsschwerhörigkeiten. Z. Laryng. Rhinol. Otol. 1961; 40: 521
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lucas A. Die Differentialdiagnose der verschiedenen Schallempfindungsschwerhörigkeiten mittels einer neuen audiometrischen Untersuchungsmethode. H. N. O. 1962; 10: 43
   Google Scholar
• Maspétiol R., Semette D. La valeur d'intelligibilité des differentes frequences. Ann. Otolaryng. (Paris) 1956; 73: 812
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maspétiol R., Semette D. Les tests d'atteinte auditive corticale et centrale. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1964; 58: 459
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maspétiol R., Semette D., Adrianjatovo J. Les surdités bulbo-protubérantielles. A propos de 13 cas. Ann. Otolaryng. (Paris) 1964; 81: 327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maspétiol R., Semette D., Mathieu C. Introduction à l'étude des troubles corticaux. Ann. Otolaryng. (Paris) 1960; 77: 286
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maspétiol R., Semette D., Mathieu C. Sémiologie des troubles auditifs d'origine corticale ou centrale. Presse Med. 1961; 69: 2061
   Google Scholar
• Maspétiol R., Semette D., Tissie. Le Weber paradoxal. Ann. Otolaryng. (Paris) 1963; 80: 935
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matzker J. Zentrale Sprachenaudiometrie. Vorläufige Mitteilung. Arch. Ohr. Nas. Kehlkopfheilk. 1956; 169: 373
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matzker J. Ein neuer Weg zur otologischen Diagnostik zerebraler Erkrankungen. Z. Laryng. Rhinol. Otol 1957; 36: 177
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matzker J. Ein binauraler Hörsynthese-Test zum Nachweis zerebraler Hörstörungen. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1958
   Google Scholar
• Matzker J. Two new methods for the assessment of central auditory functions in cases of brain disease. Ann. Otol. 1959; 68: 1185
   Google Scholar
• Matzker J., Welker H. Die Prüfung des Richtungshörens zum Nachweis und zur topischen Diagnostik von Hirnerkrankungen. Z. Laryng. Rhinol. Otol. 1959; 38: 277
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller G. A. The masking of speech. Psychol. Bull. 1947; 44: 105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller G. A. Language and communication. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, Toronto, London 1951
   Google Scholar
• Miller G. A., Licklider J. C. R. The intelligibility of interrupted speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1950; 22: 167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller G. A., Nicely P. E. An analysis of perceptual confusion among some English consonants. J, Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1955; 27: 338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mounier-Kuhn P., Bonnefoy J., Morgon M. Perception auditive corticale et hémisphérectomie. Confin. Neurol. 1963; 23: 326
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mounier-Kuhn P., Lafon J. C. Le test phonétique et l'examen des troubles auditifs vocaux. J. Franc. O. R. L. 1957; 6: 8
   Google Scholar
• Owens E. Intelligibility of words varying in familiarity. J. Speech Hearing Res. 1961; 4: 113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palva T. Finnish speech audiometry. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1952, Suppl. 101
   Google Scholar
• Palva T. On speech audiometry. Spectrographic studies of single sounds and of test words. Acta Otolaryng, (Stockh.) 1958a; 49: 429
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palva T. Whispered voice audiometry. I. Spectrographic studies of single sounds and test words. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1958b; 49: 530
   Google Scholar
• Palva T., Palva A. Masking in audiometry. III Reflections upon the present position. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1962; 54: 521
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson G. E., Barney H. L. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1952; 24: 175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pialoux P. Perturbations de l'intelligibilité dans les surdites eochleaires et retrocochleaires. J. Franc. O. R. L. 1962; 11: 909
   Google Scholar
• Pollack I. Monaural and binaural threshold sensitivity for tones and for white noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1948a; 20: 52
   Google Scholar
• Pollack I. Effects of high pass and low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1948b; 20: 259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Quiros J. B. 1960, Cited by Bocca, E., and Calearo, C., 1963
   Google Scholar
• Robinson D. W. Statistical aspects of the relation between binaural and monaural thresholds. Acustica 1961; 11: 185
   Google Scholar
• Robinson D. W., Whittle L. S. The loudness of directional sound fields. Acustica 1960; 10: 74
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein M., Meyersohn D. Recherches sur le temps de réaction auditive. Ann. Otolaryng. (Paris) 1963; 80: 971
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenau H. Zentrale Hörprüfungen als Testverfaren für Neuropharmaca. München. Med. Wschr. 1962; 104: 330
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Sa G. Audiologic findings in central nerve deafness. Laryngoscope 1958; 68: 309
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sacio C. F., Beck C. J. The power of fundamental speech sound. Bell Syst. Techn. J. 1926; 5: 393
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Longo L. P., Forster F. M. Clinical significance of impairment of sound localization. Neurology (Minneap.) 1958; 8: 119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Longo L. P., Forster F. M., Auth T. L. A clinical test for sound localization and its applications. Neurology (Minneap.) 1957; 7: 655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seebeck A. 1846, Cited by Hirsh, I. J., 1948 a
   Google Scholar
• Shaw A., Newman E. B., Hirsh I. J. The difference between monaural and binaural threshold. J. Exp. Psychol 1947; 37: 229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shower E. G., Biddulph R. Differential pitch sensitivity of the ear. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1931; 3: 275
   Google Scholar
• Silverman S. R., Hirsh I. J. Problems related to the use of speech in clinical audiometry. Ann. Otol 1955; 64: 1234
   Google Scholar
• Sovijärvi A. Die gehaltenen, geflüsterten und gesungenen Vokale und Nasale der finnischen Sprache. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fennic. B. 1938; 44: 2
   Google Scholar
• Sovijärvi A. Sonagrammitutkimuksia Kuhmoisten murteen liudennuksesta. Verba docent. SKS, Helsinki 1959; 423, Juhlakirja Lauri Hakulisen 60-vuotispäiväksi 6.10.1959
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg J. C. Effects of distortion upon the recognition of speech sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1929; 1: 121
   Google Scholar
• Stevens S. S., Egan J. P., Miller G. A. Method of measuring speech spectra. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1947; 19: 771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarchanow J. 1878, Cited by Hirsh, I. J., 1948 a
   Google Scholar
• Tato J. M., de Quiros J. B. Die sensibilierte Sprachenaudiometrie. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockh.) 1960; 51: 593
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tiffany W. R., Bennet D. N. Intelligibility of slow-played speech. J. Speech Hearing Res. 1961; 4: 248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Upton M., Holway A. H. On the psychophysics of hearing: I. Monaural differential sensitivity and exposure time. II. Binaural differential sensitivity and exposure time. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1937; 23: 29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Urbantschnitsch V. 1893, Cited by Hirsh, I. J., 1948 a
   Google Scholar
• Wagner K. W. 1954, Cited by Kainz F.
   Google Scholar
• Wallach H. The role of head movements and vestibular and visual cues in sound localization. J. Exp. Psychol. 1940; 27: 339
   Google Scholar
• Walsh E. G. An investigation of sound localization in patients with neurological abnormalities. Brain 1957; 80: 222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W. S. Y., Fillmore C. J. Intrinsic cues and consonant perception. J. Speech Hearing Res. 1961; 4: 130
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiik K. Phoneme boundaries of Finnish vowels. Proc. 4th Int. Congr. Phonetic Sci., Helsinki 1961; 1961: 795
   Google Scholar
• Wildhagen F. K. Der Wert des Audiograms bei zentralen Hörstörungen. Arch. Ohr. Nas. Kehlkopfheilk. 1954; 166: 59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ylppö A., Sovijärvi A. Sonagraphic and palatographic studies of full denture, half denture and edentulous cases. Acta Odont. Scand. 1962; 20: 257
   PubMedGoogle Scholar