Cochlear Microphonic Responses to Pure Tones in Man Recorded by a Non-Surgical Method

Reference

• Änggård L. An electrophysiological study of the development of cochlear functions in the rabbit. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockholm.) 1965; 203, Suppl.
   Google Scholar
• Andreev A. M., Arapova A. A., Gerusuni S. V. On the electrical potentials of the human cochlea. J. Physiol. (USSR). 1939; 26: 205
   Google Scholar
• Bordley J. E., Ruben R. J., Lieberman A. T. Human cochlear potentials. Laryngoscope (St. Louis) 1961; 74: 463
   Google Scholar
• Brinkman W. F. B., Tolk J. Aural microphonics in man. Pract. Otorhinolaryng. (Basel) 1961/1962; 23: 325
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox J. R., Jr. Special Purpose digital computers in biology. Computers in Biomedical Research, R. W. Stacy, B. D. Waxman. Academic Press, New York 1965; Vol. 2: 79–87
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. Psychophysiology of hearing and deafness. Handbook of Experimental Psychology, S. S. Stevens. J. Wiley & Sons., New York 1951; 1116–1142
   Google Scholar
• Davis H., Benson R. W., Covell W. P., Fernandez C., Goldstein R., Katsuki Y., Legouix J. P., McAuliffe D. R., Tasaki I. Acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1953; 25: 1180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H. Biophysics and physiology of the inner ear. Physiol. Rev. 1957; 37: 1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H. Transmission and transduction in the cochlea. Laryngoscope (St. Louis) 1958a; 68: 359
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis H., Deatherage B. H., Eldredge D. H., Smith C. A., Smith C. A. Summating potentials of the cochlea. Amer. J. Physiol. 1958b; 195: 251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H., Deatherage B. H., Rosenblut B., Fernandez C., Kimura R., Smith C. A. Modifications of cochlear potentials produced by streptomycin poisoning and by extensive venous obstruction. Laryngoscope (St. Louis) 1958c; 68: 596
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis H. Mechanism of excitation of auditory nerve impulses. Neural Mechanisms of the Auditory and Vestibular Systems, G. L. Rasmussen, W. Windle. C. Thomas Publisher., Sprigfield, Ch. 1960; 21–39
   Google Scholar
• Eldredge D. H., Covell W. P., Davis H. Recovery from acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. Luryngoscope (St. Louis) 1957; 67: 66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eldredge D. H., Covell W. P. A laboratory method for the study of acoustic trauma. Luryngoscope (St. Louis) 1958; 68: 465
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eldredge D. H., Covell W. P., Cannon R. P. Acoustic trauma following intermittent exposure to tones. Ann. Otol. (Et. Louis) 1959; 68: 1959
   Google Scholar
• Elliott D. N. Effect of peripheral lesions on acuity and discrimination in animals. Sensorineural Hearing Processes and Disorders, A. B. Graham. Little, Brown, Boston 1967; 179–189
   Google Scholar
• Flach M., Seidel P. Mikrophonpotentiale (MP) des menschlichen Ohres. Arch. Klin. Exp. Ohr. Nas. Kehlkopfheilk. (Berlin) 1968; 190: 229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fromm B., Nylen C., Zotterman Y. Studies in the mechanism of the Wever and Bray-Effect. Acta Otolaryng. (Stcckholm) 1935; 22: 477
   Google Scholar
• Gavilan C., Sanjuan J. Microphonic potential picked up from the human tympanic membrane. Ann. Otol. (St. Louis) 1964; 73: 101
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein R. Analysis of summating potential in cochlear responses of guinea pigs. Amer. J. Physiol. 1954; 178: 331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein M. H., Jr. Averaging techiniques applied to evoked responses. Computer Techniques in EEG Analysis, M. A. B. Brazier. Elsevier Publishing, Amsterdam 1961; 59–63, Suppl. 20 to The EEG Journal
   Google Scholar
• Hepp-Reymond M.-C., Palin J. Patterns in the cochlear potentials of the Tokay gecko (Gekko gecko). Actu Otolaryng. (Stockholm) 1968; 65: 270
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hilger J. A., Boies L. R., Jr., Roth N. A. Percutaneous recording of cochlear microphonics in cats. Arch. Otolariyng. (Chicago) 1965; 82: 591
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krejci F. Untersuchungen zur Frage der bioelektorischen Funktionsprüfung der Schnecke. Mschr. Ohrenheilk. 1949; 83: 224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krejci F., Bornschein H. Untersuchungen über die topische Abhängigkeit des Elektrocochleogramma. Mschr. Okrenheilk. 1950; 84: 1
   Google Scholar
• Katzman R. Sensory evoked response in man. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., R. Katzman, H. E. Whipple, 1964; 112
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence M., Wolsk D., Burton R. D. Stimulation deafness, cochlear patterns, and significance of electrical recording methods. Ann. Otol. (St. Louis) 1959; 68: 5
   Google Scholar
• Lempert J., Meltzer P. E., Wever E. G., Lawrence M. The cochleogram and its clinical application. Concluding observations. Arch. Otolaryng. (Chicago) 1950; 51: 307
   Google Scholar
• Lempert J., Wever E. G., Lawrence M. The cochleogram and its clinical application: a preliminary report. Arch. Otolaryng. (Chicago) 1947; 45: 61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGill T. E. Auditory sensitivity and the magnitude of the cochlear potential. Ann. Otal. (St. Louis) 1959; 68: 193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller J. D., Engebretson A. M., Weston P. B. Recording the waveforms of periodic acoustic signals at levels near and below 0.0002 μ bar. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1964; 36: 1951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa Y. Experimental study of progression of cochlear damage induced by dihydrostrcptomycin. J. Otorhinolaryng. Soc. Jap. (Tokyo) 1968; 71: 217
   Google Scholar
• Perlman H. G., Case T. J. Electrical phenomena of the cochlea in man. Arch. Otolaryng. (Chicago) 1941; 34: 710
   Google Scholar
• Pestalozza G., Davis H. Electrical responses of guinea pig to high audiofrequencies. Amer. J. Physiol. 1956; 185: 595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portmann M., Le Bert G., Aran J. -M. Potentiels cochléaires obtenus chez l'homme en dehors de toute intervention chirurgicale. Note preliminaire. Rev. Laryng. (Bordenux) 1967; 88: 11
   Google Scholar
• Portmann M., Aran J. -M., Le Bert G. Electro-cochléogramme en dehors de toute intervention chirurgicale. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockholm) 1968; 65: 105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ronis B. J. Cochlear potentials in otosclerosis. Laryngoscope (St. Louis) 1966; 78: 212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblith W. A. Processing Neuroelectric Data, W. A. Rosenblith. The M. I. T. Press, Cambridge 1959
   Google Scholar
• Ruben R. J., Knickerbocker G. G., Sekula J., Nager G. T., Bordley J. E. Cochlear microphonics in man. Preliminary report. Laryngoscope (St. Louis) 1959; 69: 665
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruben R. J., Sekula J., Bordley J. E., Knickerbocker G. C., Nager G. T., Fish U. Human responses to sound stimuli. Ann. Otol. (St. Louis) 1960; 69: 459
   Google Scholar
• Ruben R. J., Lieberman A. T., Bordley J. E. Some observations on cochlear potentials and nerve action potentials in children. Laryngoscope (St. Louis) 1962; 72: 545
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruben R. J., Bordley J. E., Lieberman A. T. Cochlear potentials in man. Laryngoscope (St. Louis) 1961; 71: 1141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruben R. J. Cochlear potentials as a diagnostic test in deafness. Sensorineural Hearing Processes und Disorders, A. B. Graham. Little, Brown, Boston 1967; 313–337
   Google Scholar
• Simmons F. B., Beatty D. L. The significance of round-window-recorded cochlear potentials in hearing. Ann. Otol. (St. Louis) 1962; 71: 767
   Google Scholar
• Shiraiwa M. Studies on permanent electrodes implanted on the round window of rabbits. J. Otorhinolaryng. Soc. Jap. (Tokyo) 1966; 69: 631
   Google Scholar
• Sohmer H., Feinmesser M. Cochlear action potentials recorded from the external ear in man. Ann. Otol. (St. Louis) 1967; 76: 427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreng M., Keidel W. D. Separierung von Cerebroaudiogramm (CAG), Neuroaudiogramm (NAG) und Otoaudiogramm (OAG) in der objektiven Audimetrie. Arch. Klin. Exp. Ohr. Nas. Kehlkophheilk. (Berlin) 1967; 189: 225
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stevens S. S., Davis H. Hearing. Its Psychology and Physiology. J. Wiley & Sons, New York 1938
   Google Scholar
• Tasaki I., Davis D., Legouix J. P. The space-time pattern of the cochlear microphonics (guinea pig), as recorded by differential electrodes. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1952a; 24: 502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasaki I., Fernandez C. Modification of cochlear microphonics and action potentials by KCL solution and by direct currents. J. Neurophysiol. 1952b; 15: 497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasaki I., Davis H., Eldredge D. H. Exploration of cochlear potentials in guinea pig with a microelectrode. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1954; 26: 765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasaki I. Hearing. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 1957; 19: 417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wever E. G., Lawrence M. Physiological Acoustics. Princeton University Press, Princeton 1954
   Google Scholar
• Wever E. G., Lawrence M. Patterns of injury produced by overstimulation of the ear. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1955; 27: 853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wever E. G. The cochlear potentials and their relation to hearing. Ann. Otol. (St. Louis) 1959; 68: 975
   Google Scholar
• Wever E. G. Electrical potentials of the cochlea. Physiol. Rev. 1966; 46: 102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshie N., Ohashi T., Suzuki T. Non-surgical recording of auditory nerve action posentials in man. Laryngoscope (St. Louis) 1967; 77: 76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshie N. Auditory nerve action potential responses to clicks in man. Laryngoscope (St. Louis) 1968; 78: 198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar