References

References

• American national standard methods for the calculation of the articulation index. American National Standards Institute, Inc., New York 1969, ANSIS 3.5
   Google Scholar
• Bonvallet G. L. Levels and spectra of traffic, industrial and residential area noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1951; 23: 435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R. Speech audiometry in clinical evaluation. Acta otolaryng.(Stockh.) 1952; 41: 18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R. Monaural and binaural discrimination against competing sentences. Int. Audiol. 1965; 4(3)5
   Google Scholar
• Cederlöf R., Friberg L., Hammarfors P., Holmquist S. E., Jonsson E., Kajland A. Studier över ljudnivåer och hygieniska olägenheter av trafikbuller samt förslag till åtgärder. Nord. Hyg. T. 1961; 42: 101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corso J. F. Age and sex differences in pure-tone thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1959; 31: 498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denes P. B., Pinson E. N. The speech chain. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., New York 1963; 116
   Google Scholar
• Dirks D. D., Stream R. W., Wilson R. H. Speech audiometry: earphone and sound field. J. Speech Hearing Dis. 1972; 37: 162
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dreher J. J., O'Neill J. J. Effects of ambient noise on speaker intelligibility for words and phrases. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1957; 29: 1320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dureman I., Sälde H. Psykometriska och experimentalpsykologiska metoder för klinisk tillämpning. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm 1959
   Google Scholar
• Egan J. P. Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscop. 1948; 58: 955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbanks G. Test of phonemic differentiation: the rhyme test. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1958; 30: 596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fant G. 1972, Personal communication
   Google Scholar
• Farrimond T. Factors influencing auditory perception of pure tones and speech. J. Speech Hearing Res. 1962; 5: 194
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Firestone C. The phase difference and amplitude ratio at the ears dae to a source of pure tone. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1930; 2: 260
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. Auditory patterns. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1940; 12: 47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler E. P. A simple method of measuring percentage of capacity for hearing speech. Arch. Otolaryng.(Chicago) 1942; 36: 874
   Google Scholar
• Fransson A., Hasselrot M., Lindström B., Lundborg T. Hörselpsykologiska uppgifter inom audiologiskt lagarbete. Nord. Audiol. 1969; 18: 166
   Google Scholar
• French N. R., Steinberg J. C. Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1947; 19: 90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner M. B. Effect of noise on listening levels in conference telephony. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1964; 36: 2354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glorig A., Ward W. D., Nixon J. Damage risk criteria and noise-induced hearing loss. Arch. Otolaryng.(Chicago) 1961; 74: 413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris J. D. Pure-tone acuity and the intelligibility of everyday speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1965a; 37: 824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R. Monaural and binaural speech intelligibility and the stereophonic effect based upon temporal cues. Laryngoscop. 1965b; 75: 428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris J. D., Haines H. L., Myers C. K. A new formula for using the audiogram to predict speech hearing loss. AMA Arch. Otolaryng. 1956; 63: 158
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heibel C. A. Erfarenheter av förebyggande hörselvård vid en större verkstadsindustri. Svensk Läkartidn. 1962; 59: 3347
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hinchcliffe R. The threshold of hearing of a random sample rural population. Acta otolaryng.(Stockh.) 1959; 50: 411
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh I. J. The relation between localization and intelligibility. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1950; 22: 196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh I. J. The measurement of hearing. McGraw-Hill, New York 1952
   Google Scholar
• Hodge J. L., jr., Lehmann E. L. Estimates of location based on rank tests. Annals of Mathem. Statistics. 1963; 34: 598
   Google Scholar
• Howes D. On the relation between the intelligibility and frequency of occurrence of English words. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1957; 29: 296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högger D. Die Auswirkungen des Lärms auf Gesundheit und Wohlbefinden. Schweiz. Bl. Arbeitssicherheit. Nr. 1965; 66
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Carhart R., Dirks D. Binaural hearing aids and speech intelligibility. J. Speech Hearing Res. 1961; 4: 137
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson B. 1966, Personal communication
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh I. J. 1971, Personal communication
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen V. O. The hearing of speech in auditoriums. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1929; 1: 56
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen V. O., Harris C. M. Acoustical designing in architecture. Wiley, New York 1950, chapter 9
   Google Scholar
• Koenig W. Subjective effects in binaural hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1950; 22: 61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kryter K. D. Methods for the calculation and use of the articulation index. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1962a; 34: 1689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kryter K. D. Validation of the articulation index. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1962b; 34: 1698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kryter K. D. The effects of noise on man. Academic Press, New York 1970
   Google Scholar
• Kryter K. D., Whitman E. C. Some comparisons between rhyme and PB-word intelligibility tests. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1965; 37: 1146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kryter K. D., Williams C., Green D. M. Auditory acuity and the perception of speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1962; 34: 1217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kylin B. Studies on the temporary hearing threshold shift at different frequencies after exposure to various octave bands of noise. Acta otolaryng.(Stockh.) 1959; 50: 531
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kryter K. D. Temporary threshold shift and auditory trauma following exposure to steady-state noise Stockholm. Acta otolaryng.(Stockh.) 1960, Suppl.: 152
   Google Scholar
• Licklider J. C. R. The influence of interaural phase relations upon the masking of speech by white noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1948; 20: 150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidén G. Speech audiometry. Thesis, Stockholm 1954; 114, Acta otolaryng.(Stockh.) Suppl
   Google Scholar
• Lidén G., Fant G. Swedish word material for speech audiometry and articulation tests. Acta otolaryng.(Stockh.) Suppl. 1954; 116: 189
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindqvist S. Hörselskador hos byggnadsarbetare. Svensk Läkartidn. 1970; 67: 4283
   Google Scholar
• Lovrinic J. H., Burgi E. J., Curry E. T. A comparative evaluation of five speech discrimination measures. J. Speech Hearing Res. 1968; 11: 372
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundquist B. 1971, Personal communication
   Google Scholar
• Meister F. J., Ruhrberg W. Messung der Verkehrslautstärke in einer Grosstadt. VDI-Zeitschrif. 1953; 95: 373
   Google Scholar
• Meyer E. Definition and diffusion in rooms. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1954; 26: 630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller G. A. The masking of speech. Psychol. Bull. 1947; 44: 105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller G. A., Nicely P. E. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1955; 27: 338, erratum 617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller G. A., Heise G. A., Lichten W. The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. J. Exp. Psychol. 1951; 41: 329
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller R. G., jr. Simultaneous statistical inference. McGraw-Hill, New York 1966
   Google Scholar
• Moncur J. P., Dirks D. Binaural and monaural speech intelligibility in reverberation. J. Speech Hearing Res. 1967; 10: 186
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neely K. K. Effect of visual factors on the intelligibility of speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1956; 28: 1275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson J. F., Miller A. W., Jr., Shyne N. A. A comparison of five articulation tests. Cited in: Kryter K. D. Whitman E. C., Some comparisons. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1960; 37: 1146
   Google Scholar
• Nordlund B., Fritzell B. The influence of azimuth on speech signals. Acta otolaryng.(Stockh.) 1963; 56: 632
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nordlund B., Kihlman T., Lindblad S. Use of articulation tests in auditorium studies. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1968; 44: 148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett J. M. Perception of vowels heard in noises of various spectra. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1957; 29: 613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack I., Pickett J. M. Stereophonic listening and speech intelligibility against voice babble. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1958; 30: 131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack I., Rubenstein H., Decker L. Intelligibility of known and unknown message sets. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1959; 31: 273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quiggle R. R., Glorig A., Delk J. H., Summerfield A. B. Predicting hearing loss for speech from pure tone audiograms. Laryngoscop. 1957; 67: 1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quist-Hanssen S., Steen E. Observed and calculated hearing loss for speech in noise-induced deafness. Acta otolaryng.(Stockh.) 1960; 158(Suppl.)277
   Google Scholar
• Risberg A. 1968, Personal communication
   Google Scholar
• Ronge H. E. Hygieniska principer för kontroll av samhällsbullret. IVA 1955; 26: 354
   Google Scholar
• Sabine P. E. On estimating the percentage loss of useful hearing. Trans. Am. Acad. Ophth. 1942; 179
   Google Scholar
• Samhällsplanering och vägtrafikbuller. Statens planverk 1972, Rapport 22
   Google Scholar
• Savin H. B. Word-frequency effect and errors in the perception of speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1963; 35: 200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw W. A., Newman E. B., Hirsh I. J. The difference between monaural and binaural thresholds. J. Exp. Psychol. 1947; 37: 229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spoor A. Presbycusis values in relation to noise induced hearing loss. Int. Audiol. 1967; 6: 48
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg J. C. Effects of distorsion upon the recognition of speech sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1929; 1: 121
   Google Scholar
• Stevens K. N., Baruch J. J. Community noise and city planning. Handbook of noise control, C. M. Harris. McGraw-Hill, New York 1957, chapt. 35
   Google Scholar
• Stuckey C. W. Investigation of the precision of an articulation-testing program. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1963; 35: 1782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensk byggnorm. 1967; 67, Statens planverk. Publ.Nr
   Google Scholar
• Thompson P. O., Webster J. C., Gales R. S. Liveness effects on the intelligibility of noise-masked speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1961; 33: 604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thwing E. J. Effect of repetition on articulation scores for PB-words. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1956; 28: 302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafikbulier i bostadsområden. 1968, Rapport från Byggforskningen 36
   Google Scholar
• Wendt K. Die Wortverständlichkeit bei zweiohrigem Hören. Nachr. techn. Fachber. 1959; 15: 21
   Google Scholar
• Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometr. Bull. 1945; 1: 80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwislocki J., Maire F., Feldman A. S., Rubin H. On the effect of practice and motivation on the threshold of audibility. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1958; 30: 254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar