A Test Battery Approach to the Investigation of Susceptibility to Temporary Threshold Shift

References

• American National Standards Institute. American standard criteria for background noise in audiometer rooms, ANSI. American National Standards Institute, New York 1960, 53.1
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. Specifications for audiometers. American National Standards Institute, New York 1969, ANSI 53.6
   Google Scholar
• Bohne B. A., Eldredge D. H., Mills J. H. Cochlear potentials and electron microscopy applied to the study of small cochlear lesions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1973; 82: 595
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bredberg G. Cellular pattern and nerve supply of the human organ of Corti. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1968, Suppl. 236: 1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clack T. D., Bess F. H. Aural harmonics: The tone-on-tone masking versus the best-beat method in normal and abnormal listeners. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1969; 67: 399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corso J. F. Presbycusis as a complicating factor in evaluating noise-induced hearing loss. Effects of Noise on Hearing, D. Henderson, R. P. Hamernik, D. S. Dosanjh, J. H. Mills. Raven Press, New York 1976
   Google Scholar
• Crowe S. J., Guild S. R., Polvogt L. M. Observations on the pathology of high-tone deafness. Johns Hopkins Med Bull 1934; 54: 315
   Google Scholar
• Davis H., Hudgins C. V., Marquis R. J., Nichols R. H., Jr, Peterson G. E., Ross D. A., Stevens S. S. The selection of hearing aids. Laryngoscope 1946; 56: 85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey N. M., Heath R. W. Basic Statistical Methods. Harper, & Row, New York 1974
   Google Scholar
• Drescher D. G., Eldredge D. H. Species differences in cochlear fatigue related to acoustics of outer and middle ears of guinea pig and chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 56: 929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldredge D. H., Mills J. H., Bohne B. A. Anatomical, behavioral and electrophysiological observations on chinchillas after long exposures to noise. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1973; 20: 64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fausti S. The relationship between aural harmonic thresholds and MCL for speech. University of Washington, Seattle 1971, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Henderson D., Hamernik R. P., Sitler R. W. Audiometric and anatomical correlates of impulse noise exposure. Arch Otolaryngol 1974; 99: 62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirsh I., Ward W. D. Recovery of auditory threshold after strong acoustic stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1952; 24: 131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh I., Bilger R. Auditory-threshold recovery after exposure to pure tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1955; 27: 1186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood J. D. Studies in auditory fatigue and adaptation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1950, Suppl. 92: 1
   Google Scholar
• Hood J. D. Observations upon the relationship of loudness discomfort level and auditory fatigue to sound-pressure level and sensation level. J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 44: 959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L. E. Investigation of some cochlear parameters and their relationship to susceptibility. Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan 1976, Unpublished M. A. thesis
   Google Scholar
• Humes L. E. Review of four new indices of susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss. J Occup Med 1977; 19: 116
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes L. E. The aural overload test: Twenty years later. J Speech Hear Dis., (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Humes L. E., Schwartz D. M. Influence of overstimulation on TTS and the onset of aural overload. Scand Audiology., (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Humes L. E., Schwartz D. M., Bess F. H. The threshold of octave masking (TOM) test as a predictor of noise-induced TTS. J Auditory Res.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence M., Blanchard C. L. Prediction of susceptibility to acoustic trauma by determination of the threshold of distortion. Indust Med Surg 1954; 23: 193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawrence M., Yantis P. A. Thresholds of overload in normal and pathological ears. Arch Otolaryngol 1956; 63: 67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence M., Yantis P. A. Individual differences in functional recovery and structural repair following over-stimulation of the guinea pig ear. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1957; 66: 595
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lightfoot C. Contribution to the study of auditory fatigue. J Acoust Soc Am 1955; 27: 356
   Google Scholar
• Lipscomb D. M. Audiometry in fluctuant hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin N Amer 1975a; 8: 439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipscomb D. M. What is the audiogram really telling us? Part I. Audiometrics vs. cochlear damage. Maico Audiological Library Series 1975b; 13: 5
   Google Scholar
• Lipscomb D. M. What is the audiogram really telling us? Part II. Sensorineural hearing losses. Maico Audiolgoical Library Series 1975c; 13: 6
   Google Scholar
• Miller J. D. Temporary hearing loss at 4000 cps as a function of the intensity of a three-minute exposure to a noise of a uniform spectrum level. Laryngoscope 1958; 68: 660
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan D. H., Wilson R. H., Dirks D. D. Loudness discomfort level: Selected methods and stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 56: 577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noffsinger D. P., Tillman T. W. Post-exposure responsiveness in the auditory system. I. Immediate sensitization. J Acoust Soc Am 1970; 47: 546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüedi L. Different types and degrees of acoustic trauma by experimental exposure of the human and animal ear to pure tones and noise. Laryngoscope 1960; 70: 702
   Google Scholar
• Siegel S. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York 1956
   Google Scholar
• Silverman S. R. Tolerance for pure tones and speech in normal and defective hearing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1947; 56: 658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suga F., Lindsay J. R. Histological observations on presbycusis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976; 85: 169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward W. D. The concept of susceptibility to hearing loss. J Occup Med 1965; 7: 595
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ward W. D. Susceptibility to auditory fatigue. Contributions to Sensory Physiology, W. D. Neff. Academic Press, New York 1968
   Google Scholar
• Ward W. D. Adaptation and fatigue. Modern Developments in Audiology2nd edn., J. Jerger. Academic Press, New York 1973
   Google Scholar
• Ward W. D., Glorig A., Sklar D. L. Dependence of temporary threshold shift at 4 kc on intensity and time. J Acoust Soc Am 1958; 30: 944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar