Auditory Capabilities of Patients Implanted with the House Single-channel Cochlear Implant

References

• Bilger R. C. Evaluation of subjects presently fitted with implanted auditory prostheses. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1977; 86(Suppl. 38)1–176
   Google Scholar
• Bilger R. C., Hopkinson N. T. Hearing performance with the auditory prosthesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1977; 86(Suppl. 38)76–91
   Google Scholar
• Brimacombe J. A., Doyle K. J. Multivariate analyses of prevocalic consonant perceptions by cochlear implant users. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Toronto, Ontario, 1982
   Google Scholar
• Brimacombe J. A., Eisenberg L. S. Tone decay in subjects with the single-channel cochlear implant. Audiology 1984, (in press).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danley M. J., Fretz R. J. Design and functioning of the single-electrode cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982; 91(Suppl. 91)21–26
   Google Scholar
• Dent L. J. Vowel discrimination with the single-electrode cochlear implant: A pilot study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982; 91(Suppl. 91)41–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dowell R. C., Martin L. F. A., Tong Y. C., Clark G. M., Seligman P. M., Patrick J. F. A 12-consonant confusion study on a multiple-channel cochlear implant patient. J Speech Hear Research 1982; 25: 509–516
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eddington D. K. Speech recognition in deaf subjects with multichannel intracochlear electrodes. Cochlear Prostheses: An International Symposium, C. W. Parkins, S. M. Anderson. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1983; 405: 241–258
   Google Scholar
• Edgerton B. J., Doyle K. J., Brimacombe J. A., Danley M. J., Fretz R. J. The effects of signal processing by the House-Urban single-channel stimulator on auditory perception abilities of patients with cochlear implants. Cochlear Prostheses: An International Symposium, C. W. Parkins, S. M. Anderson. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1983; 405: 311–322
   Google Scholar
• Edgerton B. J., Prietto A, Danhauer J. L. Cochlear implant patient performance on the MAC battery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1983; 16: 267–280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg L. S., Berliner K. I., Thielemeir M. A., Kirk K. I., Tiber N. Cochlear implants in children. Ear Hear 1983; 4: 41–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelmann L. R., Waterfall M. K., Hough J. V. D. Results following cochlear implantation and rehabilitation. Laryngoscope 1981; 91: 1821–1833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erber N, Alencewicz C. Audiologic evaluation of deaf children. J. Speech Hear Dis 1976; 41: 256–267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fourcin A. J., Rosen S. M., Moore B. C. J., Douek E. E., Clark G. P., Dodson H, Bannister L. H. External electrical stimulation of the cochlea: Clinical, psychophysical, speech-perceptual, and histological findings. Br J Audiol 1979; 13: 85–107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helmerich L. F., Edgerton B. J. Psychoelectric measurements and results from cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982; 91(Suppl. 91)35–40
   Google Scholar
• Hochmair E. S., Hochmair-Desoyer I. J. Percepts elicited by different speech-coding strategies. Cochlear Prostheses: An International Symposium, C. W. Parkins, S. M. Anderson. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1983; 405: 268–279
   Google Scholar
• Hochmair-Desoyer I. J., Hochmair E. S., Burian K, Fischer R. E. Four years of experience with cochlear prostheses: A review. Medical Progress Through Technology 1981; 8: 107–119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• House W. F. Cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976; 85(Suppl. 27)1–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House W. F. Surgical considerations in cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982; 85(Suppl. 27)15–20
   Google Scholar
• Kirk R. E. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Belmont, California 1968
   Google Scholar
• Kirk K. I., Edgerton B. J. The effects of cochlear implant use on voice parameters. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1983; 16: 281–292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal J, Wish M. Multidimensional Scaling. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California 1978
   Google Scholar
• Norton N. B., Berliner K. I. Environmental sounds: Test and training program for the hearing impaired. Paper presented at the American Speech and Hearing Association, Chicago, Illinois., 1977
   Google Scholar
• Owens E., Kessler D. K., Schubert E. D. Interim assessment of candidates for cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol 1982; 108: 478–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens E, Telleen C. Speech perception with hearing aids and cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol 1981; 107: 160–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson G. E., Lehiste I. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. J Acoust Soc Am 1960; 32: 693–703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruzansky S. How to use SINDSCAL, a computer program for individual differences in multidimensional scaling. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Yersey 1975
   Google Scholar
• Shower E. G., Biddulph R. Differential pitch sensitivity of the ear. J Acoust Soc Am 1931; 3: 275–287
   Google Scholar
• Thielemeir M. A., Brimacombe J. A., Eisenberg L. S. Audiological results with the cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982; 91(Suppl. 91)27–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tong Y. C., Millar J. B., Clark G. M., Martin L. F., Busby P. A., Patrick J. F. Psychophysical and speech perception studies on two multiple channel cochlear implant patients. J Laryngol Otol 1980; 94: 1241–1256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh S. M., Leake-Jones P. A. Chronic electrical stimulation of auditory nerve in cat: Physiological and histological results. Hear Res 1982; 7: 281–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler M., Miller L. W., Berliner K. I., Crary W. G. Psychological effects of cochlear implant: Patient and “index relative” perceptions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982; 91(Suppl. 91)59–61
   Google Scholar
• White M. W. Formant frequency discrimination and recognition in subjects implanted with intracochlear stimulating electrodes. Cochlear Prostheses: An International Symposium, C. W. Parkins, S. M. Anderson. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1983; 405: 348–359
   Google Scholar