The Histopathology of the Human Temporal Bone and Auditory Central Nervous System Following Cochlear Implantation in a Patient: Correlation with Psychophysics and Speech Perception Results

References

• Shepherd R K, Webb R L, Clark G M, Pyman B C, Hirshorn M S, Murray A T. Implanted material tolerance studies for a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) Suppl. 1984; 411: 71–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark G M, Blarney P J, Brown A M, Busby P A, Dowell R C, Franz B K-H, Pyman B C, Shepherd R K, Tong Y C, Webb R L, Hirshorn M S, Kuzma J, Mecklenburg D J, Money D K, Patrick J F, Seligman P M. The University of Melbourne/Nucleus multiple-electrode cochlear prosthesis. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, P Pfaltz, 1987; Vol 38
   Google Scholar
• Simmons F B. Permanent intracochlear electrodes in cats, tissue tolerance and cochlear microphonics. Laryngoscope 1967; 77: 171–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark G M. A hearing prosthesis for severe perceptive deafness—experimental studies. J Laryngol Otol 1973; 87: 929–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schindler R A, Merzenich M M. Chronic intracochlear electrode implantation: cochlear pathology and acoustic nerve survival. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1974; 83: 202–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark G M, Kranz H G, Minas H, Nathar J M. Histopathological findings in cochlear implants in cats. J Laryngol Otol 1975; 89: 495–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark G M. An evaluation of per-scalar cochlear electrode implantation techniques. J Laryngol Otol 1977; 91: 185–99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton D, Millar J M, Pfingst B E. Comparison of cochlear histopathology following two implant designs for use in scala tympani. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, Suppl. 1980; 89: 11–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simmons F B. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Long-term electrophysiology and histological results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1979; 88: 533–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh S M, Leake-Jones P A. Chronic electrical stimulation of auditory nerve in cat; physiological and histological results. Hearing Research 1982; 7: 281–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd R K, Clark G M, Black R C, Patrick J F. The histopathological effects of chronic electrical stimulation in the cat cochlea. J Laryngol Otol 1983; 97: 333–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd R K, Clark G M, Black R C. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1983; Suppl 399: 19–31
   Google Scholar
• Clark G M, Crosby P A, Dowell R C, Kuzma J A, Money D K, Patrick J F, Seligman P M, Tong Y C. The preliminary clinical trial of a multichannel cochlear implant hearing prosthesis. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 74: 1911–4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark G M, Blarney P J, Busby P A, Dowell R C, Franz B K-H, Musgrave G N, Nienhuys T C, Pyman B C, Roberts S A, Tong Y C, Webb R L, Kuzma J A, Money D K, Patrick J F, Seligman P M. A multiple-electrode intracochlear implant for children. Arch Otolaryngol 1987; 113: 825–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens D, Kessler D K, Schubert E E. The minimal auditory capabilities (MAC) battery. Hearing Aid J 1981; 34: 9–34
   Google Scholar
• Clark G M, Pyman B C, Webb R L, Bailey Q E, Shepherd R K. Surgery for an improved multiple-channel cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1984; 93: 204–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz B K-H, Clark G M, Bloom D M. Surgical anatomy of the round window with special reference to cochlear implantation. J Laryngol Otol 1987; 101: 97–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin L FA, Dowell R C, Brown A M, Clark G M. Rehabilitation for multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis patients. Cochlear Implants, R A Schindler, M M Merzenich. Raven Press, New York 1985; 505–10
   Google Scholar
• Dowell R C, Mecklenburg D J, Clark G M. Speech recognition for 40 patients receiving multichannel cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol 1986; 112: 1054–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y C, Clark G M, Seligman P M, Patrick J F. Speech processing for a multiple-electrode cochlear implant hearing prosthesis. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68: 1897–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y C, Millar J B, Clark G M, Martin L FA, Busby P A, Patrick J F. Psychophysical and speech perception studies on two multiple-channel cochlear implant patients. J Laryngol Otol 1980; 94: 1241–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor M M, Creelman C D. PEST efficient estimates on probability functions. J Acoust Soc Am 1967; 41: 782–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blarney P J, Clark G M. Psychophysical studies relevant to the design of a digital tactile speech processor. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 116–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y C, Dowell R C, Blamey P J, Clark G M. Two component hearing sensations produced by two-electrode stimulation in the cochlea of a totally deaf patient. Science 1983; 219: 993–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blamey P J, Martin L FA, Clark G M. A comparison of three speech coding strategies using an acoustic model of a cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 209–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell R C, Seligman P M, Blamey P J, Clark G M. Speech perception using a two-formant 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis in quiet and in noise. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1987; 104: 439–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blamey P J, Dowell R C, Clark G M, Seligman P M. Acoustic parameters measured by a formant-estimating speech processor for a multiple-channel cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 38–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blarney P J, Dowell R C, Brown A M, Clark G M, Seligman P M. Recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 48–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh I J, Davis H, Silverman S R, Reynolds E G, Eldert E, Benson R W. Development of materials for speech audiometry. J Speech Hear Dis 1952; 17: 321–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Filippo C L, Scott B L. A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63: 1186–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y C, Clark G M, Blamey P J, Busby P A, Dowell R C. Psychophysical studies for two multiple-channel cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 71: 153–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y C, Blamey P J, Dowell R C, Clark G M. Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 74: 73–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y C, Clark G M. Percepts from scala tympani stimulation. Ann NY Acad Sci 1983; 405: 191–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayat M A. Fixation for electron microscopy. Academic Press, New York 1981; 110
   Google Scholar
• Schuknecht H E. Techniques for study of cochlear function in experimental animals. Arch Otolaryngol 1953; 58: 377–95
   Google Scholar
• Bredberg G. Cellular pattern and nerve supply of the human organ of Corti. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1968; Suppl. 236.
   Google Scholar
• Hinojosa R, Lindsay J R. Profound deafness; associated sensory and neural degeneration. Arch Otolaryngol 1980; 106: 193–201
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hinojosa R, Marion M. Histopathology of profound sensorineural deafness. Cochlear Prostheses: An International Symposium., C W Parkins, S W Anderson. 1983; 405: 459–84
   Google Scholar
• Lever W F. Degenerative Diseaes. Histopathology of the Skin,6th edn., W F Lever. Lippincott. 1983; 271
   Google Scholar
• Anderson J R. Hyaline and fibrinoid changes. Muir's Textbook of Pathology,11th edn., J R Anderson. Edward Arnold, London 1980; 274
   Google Scholar
• Otte J, Schuknecht H, Kerr A G. Ganglion cell populations in normal and pathological human cochleae. Implications for cochlear implantation. The Laryngoscope 1978; 88: 1231–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorayer B, Sarwat A, Linthicum F H. Viable spiral ganglion cells in congenital and acquired profound hearing loss. J Laryngol Otol 1980; 84: 367–76
   Google Scholar
• Paparella M M, Sugiura S. The pathology of suppurative labyrinthitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1967; 76: 554–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons F B. Permanent intracochlear electrodes in cats, tissue tolerance and cochlear microphonics. Laryngoscope 1967; 77: 171–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler R A, Merzenich M M, White M W, Björkroth B. Multielectrode intracochlear implants: nerve survival and stimulation patterns. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 691–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kellerhals B, Engström H, Ades H W. Die Morphologie des ganglionspirale Cochleae. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1967; Suppl. 226: 1–78
   Google Scholar
• Spoendlin H. Innervation densities of the cohclea. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1972; 73: 235–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ota C Y, Kimura R S. Ultrastructural study of the human spiral ganglion. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1980; 89: 53–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsson L G, House W F, Linthicum F H. Otopathological findings in a patient with bilateral cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982; Suppl. 91: 74–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House W F, Edgerton B J. A multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982; Suppl. 91: 104–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick J F, Mac Farlane J C (1987) Comparative mechanical properties of single and multi-channel electrodes. Cochlear Implant Symposium and Workshop, Melbourne. 1985, G M Clark, P A Busby. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, (Suppl. 128) 96: 46–8
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd R K, Clark G M, Pyman B C, Webb R L. The banded intracochlear electrode array: an evaluation of insertion trauma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985; 94: 55–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark G M, Pyman B C, Webb R L, Franz B K-H, Redhead T J, Shepherd R K (1987) Surgery for the safe insertion and reinsertion of the banded electrode array. Cochlear Implant Symposium and Workshop, Melbourne. 1985, G M Clark, P A Busby. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, (Suppl. 128) 96: 10–2
   Google Scholar
• Franz B K-H, Clark G M, Bloom D M. Cochlear implants and otitis media: a comparison of cochlear implant electrode insertion techniques, and the effects of otitis media induced with group A streptococci. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987; 96: 174–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pudenz R H. The use of tentalum clips for haemostasis in neurosurgery. Surgery 1942; 12: 791–7
   Google Scholar
• Linthicum F H, Galey F R. Histologic evaluation of temporal bones with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92: 610–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galey F R. Initial observations of a human temporal bone with a multi-channel implant. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1984; Suppl. 411: 38–44
   Google Scholar
• Liboff A R, Rinaldi R A, Lavine L S, Shamos M H. On electrical conduction in living bone. Clin Orthop 1975; 106: 330–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy G N, Sana S. Electrical and dielectric properties of wet bone as a function of frequency. IEEE Trans Biomed Engng 1984; 31: 296–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y C, Clark G M. Loudness summation, masking and temporal interaction for sensations produced by electric stimulation of to sites in the human cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1958–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black R C, Steel A C, Clark G M. Amplitude and frequency difference limens for electrical stimulation of the cochlea following graded degeneration of the auditory nerve. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1983; 95: 27–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinojosa R, Blough R R, Mhoon E E (1987) Profound sensorineural deafness: a histopathologic study. International Cochlear Implant Symposium and Workshop, Melbourne. 1985, G M Clark, P A Busby. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, (Suppl. 128): 43–6
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne J C, Engström H. Morphology of the vestibular ganglion cells. J Laryngol 1969; 83: 19–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ylikoski J, Collan Y, Palva T. Vestibular nerve in Meniere's disease. Arch Otolaryngol 1980; 106: 477–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shepherd R K, Murray M T, Houghton M E, Clark G M. Scanning electron microscopy of chronically stimulated platinum intracochlear electrodes. Biomaterials 1986; 6: 237–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homsy C A. Biocompatibility in selection of materials for implantation. J Biomed Mat Res 1970; 4: 341–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dymond A M, Kaechele L E, Jurist J M, Crundall P H. Brain tissue reaction to some chronically implanted metals. J Neurosurg 1970; 33: 574–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein J J, Johnson P F, Hench L L, Hunter G, Dawson W W. Cortical histopathology following stimulation with metallic and carbon electrodes. Brain Behav Evol 1977; 14: 126–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson P EK, Donaldson N, Brindley G S. Life of Pt and Pt-In stimulating electrodes in neurological prostheses. Med Biol Eng Comput 1985; 23: 84–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen G L. Efferent fibres of the cochlear nerve and cochlear nucleus. Neural mechanisms of the auditory and vestibular systems, G L Rasmussen, W F Windle, 1960; 105–115
   Google Scholar
• Engström H, Wersäll J. The ultrastructural organisation of the organ of Corti. Exp Cell Res 1958; Suppl. 5
   Google Scholar
• Moore J K. The human auditory brain stem: a comparative view. Hearing Research 1987; 29: 1–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane E S. Autoradiographic evidence of primary projections to the caudal cochlear nucleus in cats. Am J Anat 1977; 150: 641–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones D R, Casseday J H. Projections of auditory nerve in the cat as seen by anterograde transport methods. Neuroscience 1979; 4: 1299–313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine D RF. A review of the structure and function of auditory brainstem processing mechanisms. Progress in Sensory Physiology, E Ottoson. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1986; Vol. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Powell T PS, Erulkar S D. Transneuronal cell degeneration in the auditory relay nuclei of the cat. J Anat 1962; 96: 249–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster D B, Webster M. Cochlear nerve projection following organ of Corti destruction. Otolaryngology 1978; 86: 342–53
   Google Scholar
• Jean-Baptiste M, Morest K. Transneuronal changes of synaptic endings and nuclear chromatin in cats. J Comp Neurol 1975; 162: 111–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller J M, Sutton D, Webster D B. Brainstem histopathology following chronic scala tympani implantation in monkeys. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980; 89(Suppl. 66)15–7
   Google Scholar
• Richter E. Scarpa's ganglion in the cat one year after labyrinthectomy. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1981; 230: 251–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lorente de Nó R. Anatomy of the eighth nerve. III. General plan of structure of the primary cochlear nuclei. Laryngoscopoe 1933; 43: 327–50
   Google Scholar
• Brawer J R, Morest D K, Kane E C. The neuronal architecture of the cochlear nucleus of the cat. J Comp Neurol, 155: 251–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osen K K. Cytoarchitecture of the cochlear nuclei in the cat. J Comp Neurol 1969; 136: 453–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar