References
- PNopp, PSchleich, PD’Haese. Sound localization in bilateral users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2004;25:205–14.
- RLaszig, AAschendorff, MStecker, JMuller-Deile, SMaune, NDillier, et al. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:958–68.
- CCDunn, WNoble, RSTyler, MKordus, BJGantz, HJi. Bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users compared on speech perception in noise. Ear Hear 2010;31:296–8.
- ASummerfield, GRBarton, JToner, CMcAnallen, DProops, CHarries, et al. Self-reported benefits from successive bilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults: randomised controlled trial. Int J Audiol 2006;45:S99–107.
- HOlze, SGrabel, HHaupt, UForster, BMazurek. Extra benefit of a second cochlear implant with respect to health-related quality of life and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:1169–75.
- WNoble, RTyler, CDunn, NBhullar. Hearing handicap ratings among different profiles of adult cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2008;29:112–20.
- BGBichey, RTMiyamoto. Outcomes in bilateral cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:655–61.
- MSparreboom, AFSnik, EAMylanus. Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: quality of life. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;138:134–41.
- NKing, EANahm, PLiberatos, QShi, AHKim. A new comprehensive cochlear implant questionnaire for measuring quality of life after sequential bilateral cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2014;35:407–13.
- TJauhiainen. An experimental study of the auditory perception of isolated bi-syllabic Finnish words. Finland: Dissertation, University of Helsinki. 1974.
- KRobinson, SGatehouse, GGBrowning. Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:415–22.
- HSintonen. The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Ann Med 2001;33:328–36.
- UK Cochlear Implant Study Group. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults I: theory and measures of effectiveness. Ear Hear 2004;25:310–35.
- WADreschler, HVerschuure, CLudvigsen, SWestermann. ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology. Audiology 2001;40:148–57.
- MBGardner, RSGardner. Problem of localization in the median plane: effect of pinnae cavity occlusion. J Acoust Soc Am 1973;53:400–8.
- FAsp, GEskilsson, EBerninger. Horizontal sound localization in children with bilateral cochlear implants: effects of auditory experience and age at implantation. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:558–64.
- DMZeitler, MAKessler, VTerushkin, TJRolandJr, MASvirsky, AKLalwani, et al. Speech perception benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children and adults: a retrospective analysis. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:314–25.
- RLitovsky, AParkinson, JArcaroli, CSammeth. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study. Ear Hear 2006;27:714–31.
- PSchleich, PNopp, PD’Haese. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear 2004;25:197–204.
- JMChen, HAmoodi, NMittmann. Cost-utility analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a health economic assessment from the perspective of a publicly funded program. Laryngoscope 2014;124:1452–8.