Time-Frequency Analyses of TEOAE Recordings from Normals and SNHL Patients

References

• Kemp D T, Bray P B, Alexander L, Brown A M. Acoustic emission cochleography–practical aspects. ScandAudiol 1986; 25: 71–94, Suppl
   Google Scholar
• Bonfils P, Uziel A. Clinical applications of evoked otoacoustic emissions: results in normally hearing and hearing impaired subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98: 326–331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Ryan S, Bray P. Otoacoustic emission analysis and interpretation for clinical purposes. Cochlear mechanisms and otoacoustic emissions, F Grandori, G Ciafrone, D T Kemp. Karger, Basil 1990; 77–98
   Google Scholar
• Lutman M E, Mason S M, Sheppard S, Gibbin K P. Differential diagnosis potential of otoacoustic emissions: a case study. Audiology 1989; 28: 205–210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prieve B A. Otoacoustic emissions in infants and children. Basic characteristics and clinical applications. Semin Hear 1992; 13: 37–52
   Google Scholar
• Grandori F, Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Hatzopoulos S. Some factors influencing the recording and the interpretation of otoacoustic emissions evoked at different click intensily levels. Advances in otoacoustic emission, R Thornton, F Grandori. Casa Editrice Stefanoni, Vol II Milano 1994; 48–64
   Google Scholar
• Dallos P. The role of the outer hair cells in cochlear function. Contemporary sensory neurobiology, M Correia, A Perachio. Liss, New York 1989; 207–230
   Google Scholar
• Hudspeth A J. Models for mechanoelectrical transduction by hair cells. Contemporary sensory neurobiology, M Correia, A Perachio. Liss, New York 1989; 193–205
   Google Scholar
• White K R, Vohr B R, Behrens T R. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: results of the Rhode Island Hearing Assessment project. Semin Hear 1993; 14: 18–29
   Google Scholar
• European Consensus on Neonatal Screening statement. Milan 1998, May 15-16
   Google Scholar
• Fukazawa T. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in a nonlinear model of the cochlea. Hear Res 1992; 59: 17–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strube H. Evoked otoacoustic emissions as cochlear Bragg reflections. Hear Res 1989; 38: 35–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zweig G, Shera C. The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J AcoustSocAm 1995; 98: 2018–2047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wit H P, Ritsma R J. Evoked acoustical responses from the human ear: some experimental results. Hear Res 1980; 2: 253–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen D, Durand L G, Lee H C, Petitjean M, Bellemare F. Time-frequency analysis of the muscle sound of the human diaphragm. Med Biol Eng Comput 1997; 35: 649–665
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu Y, Loshi S. Noise reduction for NMR FID signals via Gabor expansion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997; 44: 512–528
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richard C, Lengelle R. Joint time and time-frequency optimal detection of K-complexes in sleep EEG. Comput Biomed Res 1998; 31: 209–229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stiber B Z, Sato S. Visualization of EEG using time-frequency distributions. Methods Inf Med 1997; 36: 298–301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheng J. Time frequency analysis of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions via smoothed pseudo-Wigner distribution. ScandAudiol 1995; 24: 91–96
   Google Scholar
• Qian S, Chen D. Decomposition of the Wigner-Ville distribution and time-frequency distribution series. IEEE Trans Signal Processing 1994; 42: 2836–2841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian S, Chen D. Discrete Gabor transform. IEEE Trans Signal Processing 1993; 41: 2429–2439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdamar Ö, Zhang J, Kalayci T, Ülgen Y. Time frequency distribution of evoked otoacoustic emissions. Br J Audiol 1997; 31: 461–471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian S, Chen D. Signal representation using adaptive normalized Gaussian functions. Signal Processing 1994; 36: 1–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallat S, Zhang Z. Matching pursuit with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans Signal Processing 1993; 41: 3397–3415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzopoulos S, Mazzoli M, Martini A. Identification of hearing loss using TEOAE-based descriptors: preliminary results. Audiology 1995; 34: 248–259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Welzl-Muller K, Stephan K. Confirmation of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions based on user-independent criteria. Audiology 1994; 33: 28–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dirckx J JJ, Daemers K, Somers T H, Offccicrs F E, Govacrts P J. Numerical assessment of TEOAE screening results: currently used criteria and their effect on TEOAE prevalence figures. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 116: 672–679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M L, Jimenez A M, Stagner B B, McCoy M J, Lons bury-Martin B L, Martin G K. Time-windowing of click-cvoked-otoacoustic emissions to increase signal-to-noise-ratio. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 599–611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet L, Vcuillet E, Chanal J M, Morgon A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions correlates between spectrum analysis and audiogram. Audiology 1991; 30: 164–172
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatzopoulos S, Prosser S, Mazzoli M, Rosignoli M, Martini A. On the clinical applicability of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs): the use of spectral discriminant functions in the identification and classification of hearing loss. Audiol Neuro-Otol 1998; 3: 402–418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T. Otoacoustic emissions, traveling waves and cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 1980; 2: 533–548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzopoulos S, Cheng J, Grzanka A, Morlet T, Martini M. On the optimization of the TEOAE recording protocols, A linear protocol derived from parameters of a time-frequency analysis. Data from neonatal subjects. Scand Audiol, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Norton S J, Widen J E. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing infants and children–emerging data and issues. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 121–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet L, Disant F, Morgon A. Effect of age in otoacoustic emissions. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol Bord 1989; 110: 67–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O-Uchi T, Kanzaki J, Satoh Y, et al. Agc-rclated changes in evoked otoacoustic emission in normal hearing ears. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1994; 514: 89–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorga M P, Neely S T, Bergman B, et al. A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2639–2648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieve B A, Gorga M P, Schmidt A, et al. Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing and hearing impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 3308–3319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reshef I, Attias J, Furst M. Characteristics of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and with noise-induced hearing loss. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 387–395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attias J, Furst M, Furman V, Reshef T, Horowitz G, Bresloff T. Noise-induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 612–618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T. Otoacoustic emissions in perspective. Otoacoustic emissions and clinical applications, M S Robinette, T J Glattke. Thieme, New York 1997; 14–18
   Google Scholar
• Harris F P, Probst R. Otoacoustic emissions and au-diometric outcomes. Otoacoustic emissions and clinical applications, M S Robinette, T J Glattke. Thieme, New York 1997; 151–180
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Bisch C. Audioscan: a high-definition audiometry technique based on constant-level frequency sweeps–a new method with new hearing indicators. Audiology 1996; 35: 63–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar