Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in a Representative Population Sample Aged 18 to 25 Years: Emisiones otoacüAsticas evocadas por transitorios en una muestra representativa de población con edades entre 18 y 25 años

References

• Kemp D T. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386–1391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray P, Kemp D. An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 191–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Probst R, Coats A C, Martin G K, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Spontaneous, click-, and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears. Hear Res 1986; 21: 261–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens J, Ip C B. Click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions in normal and hearing-impaired adults. Br J Audiol 1988; 22: 45–49
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonfils P, Piron J, Uziel A, Pujol R. A correlative study of evoked otoacoustic emissions properties and audiometric thresholds. Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1988; 245: 53–56
   Google Scholar
• Vedantam R, Musiek F E. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions in adult subjects: standard indices and test-retest reliability. Am J Otol 1991; 12: 435–442
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kapadia S, Lutman M E. Are normal hearing thresholds a sufficient condition for click-evoked otoacoustic emissions?. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101: 3566–3576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutman M E, Davis A C, Fortnum H M, Wood S. Field sensitivity of targeted neonatal hearing screening by transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 265–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis A, Bamford J, Wilson I, Ramkalawan T, Forshaw M, Wright S. A critical review of the role of neonatal screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment. Health Technology Assessment, London 1997; vol. 10
   Google Scholar
• Marshall L, Heller L M, Westhusin L. Effect of negative middle ear pressure on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 218–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trine M, Hirsch J, Margolis R. The effect of middle ear pressure on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 401–407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl B, Arnesen A, Mair I. Reproducibility and short-term variability of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1994; 23: 99–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attius J, Bresloff I, Furman V. The influence of the efferent auditory system on otoacoustic emissions in noise induced tinnitus: clinical relevance. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 116: 534–539
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham R L, Hazell J WP. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: intra-individual variability in tinnitus and normal subjects. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 235–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cane M, Lutman M, Odonoghue G. Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with cerebellopontine angle tumours. Am J Otol 1994; 15: 207–215
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prasher D, Tun T, Brookes G, Luxon L. Mechanisms of hearing loss in acoustic neuroma: an otoacoustic emission study. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1995; 115: 375–381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman M, Thornton A RD, Phillips A J, Slaven A. Otoacoustic emissions recorded at high rates in patients with confirmed acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 1996; 17: 763–772
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collet L, Veuillet E, Bene J, Morgon A. Effects of contralateral white noise on click-evoked emissions in normal and sensorineural ears: towards an exploration of the medial olivocochlear system. Audiology 1992; 31: 1–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams E A, Brookes G B, Prasher D K. Effect of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: effects in comparison with control subjects. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1994; 114: 121–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud A L, Collet L, Chery-Croze S, Magnan J, Chays A. Evidence of a medial olivocochlear involvement in contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in humans. Brain Res 1995; 705: 15–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley R M, Musiek F E. Effectiveness of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in predicting hearing level. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5: 195–203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vinck B M, Vel E D, Xu Z-M, Cauwenberge P BV. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: a normative study. Audiology 1996; 35: 231–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray R. Surveys of hearing P1401. Social and Community Planning Research, London 1997, Draft technical report
   Google Scholar
• ISO 8253-1. Acoustics–audiometric test methods–Part 1: Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva 1989
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389-1. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva 1991, Specification for standard reference zero for the calibration of pure tone air conduction audiometers
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389-3. Acoustics–reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment–Part 3. Reference equivalent threshold levels for pure tones and bone vibrators. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva 1993
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 1970; 92: 311–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutman M E. The relationship between acoustic reflex threshold and air-bone gap. Br J Audiol 1984; 18: 223–229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith P, Davis A, Ferguson M, Lutman M. The prevalence and type of social noise exposure in young adults. Noise Health 2000; 6: 41–56
   Google Scholar
• Smith P, Davis A, Ferguson M, Lutman M. Hearing in young adults. Report to ISO/TC43/WG1. Noise Health 1999; 4: 1–10
   Google Scholar
• Barrenas M L, Lindgren F. The influence of eye colour on susceptibility to TTS in humans. Br J Audiol 1991; 25: 303–308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siegel J H. Ear canal standing waves and high-frequency sound calibration using otoacoustic emission probes. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 2589–2597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel J H, Hirohata E T. Sound calibration and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at high frequencies. Hear Res 1994; 80: 146–152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely S T, Gorga M P. Comparison between intensity and pressure as measures of sound level in the ear canal. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 2925–2934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology. Descriptors for pure-tone audiometers. Br J Audiol 1988; 22: 123
   Google Scholar
• Aidan D, Lestang P, Avan P, Bonfils P. Characteristics of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOEs) in neonates. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997; 117: 25–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoli S, Probst R. The role of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions testing in the evaluation of elderly persons. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 286–293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohlen P, Hennaux C, Chantry P, Hennebert D. The occurrence of evoked oto-acoustic emissions in a normal adult population and neonates. Scand Audiol 1991; 20: 203–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reshef I, Attias J, Furst M. Characteristics of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and with noise-induced hearing loss. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 387–396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutman M E, Jennings K, Davis A C, Houston H G, Meredith R. Coloration of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions by characteristics of recording apparatus. Advances in otoacoustic emissions: Vol I–Fundamentals and clinical applications, F Grandori. Commission of the EC, Brussels 1993; 36–47
   Google Scholar
• Bonfils P, Bertrand Y, Uziel A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data and presbycusis. Audiology 1988; 27: 27–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castor X, Veuillet E, Morgon A, Collet L. Influence of aging on active micromechanical properties and on the medial olivocochlear system in humans. Hear Res 1994; 77: 1–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McFadden D, Loehlin J C, Pasenen E G. Additional findings on heritability and prenatal masculinization of cochlear mechanisms: click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1996; 97: 102–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden D. Gender differences in the auditory system. Dev Neuropsychol 1998; 14: 261–298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kei J, McPherson B, Smyth V, Latham S, Loscher J. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in infants: effects of gender, ear symmetry and activity status. Audiology 1997; 36: 61–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner M, Zhang T. Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in adults revisited. Hear Res 1997; 103: 28–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlet T, Lapillonne A, Ferber C, Duclaux R, Sann L, Putet G. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in preterm neonates–prevalence and gender effects. Hear Res 1995; 90: 44–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvaerner K J, Engdahl B, Arnesen A R, Mair I W. Temporary threshold shift and otoacoustic emissions after industrial noise exposure. Scand Audiol 1995; 24: 137–141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mansfield J D, Baghurst P, Newton V E. Otoacoustic emissions in 28 young adults exposed to amplified music. Br J Audiol 1999; 44: 211–222
   Google Scholar
• Avan P, Bonfils P, Loth D, Wit H P. Temporal patterns of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired cochlaea. Hear Res 1993; 70: 109–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avan P, Bonfils P, Loth D, Teyssou M, Menguy C. Exploration of cochlear function by otoacoustic emissions–relationship to pure-tone audiometry. Prog Brain Res 1993; 97: 67–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith P, Davis A. Social noise and hearing loss. Lancet 1999; 353: 1185
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khalfa S, Morlet T, Micheyl C, Morgon A, Collet L. Evidence of peripheral hearing asymmetry in humans: clinical implications. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997; 117: 192–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalfa S, Micheyl C, Veuillet E, Collet L. Peripheral auditory lateralization assessment using TEOAEs. Hear Res 1998; 121: 29–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns E M, Arehart K H, Campbell S L. Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1572–1575
   Google Scholar
• Fuse T, Aoyagi M, Suzuki Y, Koike Y. Frequency analysis of transiently evoked otoacouslic emissions in sensorineural hearing disturbance. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1994; 511: 91–94
   Google Scholar
• Barrenas M L. Hair cell loss from acoustic trauma in chloroquine-treated red, black and albino guinea pigs. Audiology 1997; 36: 187–201
   PubMedGoogle Scholar