Some Experiences with Hearing Disability/ Handicap and Quality of Life Measures: Algunas experiencias con discapacidad/desventaja auditiva y medidas de calidad de vida

References

• Fratalli C M. Outcomes measurement: definitions, dimensions and perspectives. Measuring outcomes in speech–language pathology, C M Fratalli. Thieme Press, New York 1998; 1–27
   Google Scholar
• Parving A. The value of speech audiometry in hearing aid rehabilitation. Scand Audiol 1991; 20: 159–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W. Noble W, ed. Hearing aid use and benefit. Whurr, Self-assessment of hearing and related functions London 1998; 86–143
   Google Scholar
• Andersen T, Pedersen F, Parving A, Lyregaard P E. Procedure for clinical testing of hearing aids. Scand Audiol 1998; 27: 249–254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinger S. Clinical assessment of modern hearing aids. Scand Audiol 1998; 27(suppl 49)50–53
   Google Scholar
• Hagerman B. Minimum Nordic requirements for clinical testing of hearing aids. Scand Audiol 1999; 20: 102–116
   Google Scholar
• Cox R, Hyde M, Gatehouse S, et al. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international Cooperation. Ear and Hearing 2000; 21: 106S–115S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cord M T, Leek M R, Walden B E. Speech recognition ability in noise and its relationsship to perceived hearing aid benefit. J Am Acad Audiol 2000;, 11: 475–483
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1997; 8: 27–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dilllon H, Birtles G, Lovegrove R. Measuring the outcomes of a national rehabilitation program: normative data for the client oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and the hearing aid user's questionnaire (HAUQ). J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 67–79
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. Glasgow hearing aid benefit profile: derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 80–103
   Google Scholar
• Cox R M, Alexander G C. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 176–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R M, Alexander G C. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: The SADL scale. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 306–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 1CIDH-2. International Classification of impairments, activities and participation. WHO, Geneva 1997
   Google Scholar
• Bentler R A, Kramer S E. Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure. Ear Hearing; 21.-37S-49S.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson B S, Gilson J S, Bergner M, et al. The sickness impact profile: development of an outcome measure of health care. Am J Public Health 1975; 65: 1304–1310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergner M, Bobbit R A, Carter W B, Gilson B S. The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. J Med Care 1981; 19: 787–805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Sherbourne C D. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992; 30: 453–483
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EuroQOL. A new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16: 199–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulrow C D, Aguilar C, Endicott J E, et al. Association between hearing impairment and the quality of life of elderly individuals. J Am Geriatric Soc 1990; 38: 45–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulrow C D, Aguilar C, Endicott J E, et al. Quality-of-life changes and hearing impairment. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113: 188–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bess F H. The role of generic health related quality of life measures in establishing audiological rehabilitation outcome. Ear Hearing 2000; 21: 74S–79S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parving A, Sibelle P. An audit of hearing rehabilitation within the health service–past and present. Scand Audiol 1995; 24: 33–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parving A, Sibelle P. Clinical study of hearing instruments–a cross sectional longitudinal audit based on consumer experiences. Audiology 2002; 40: 43–53
   Google Scholar
• Noble W, Atherley G. The hearing measurement scale–a questionnaire for the assessment of audi-tory disability. J Auditory Res 1970; 10: 229–250
   Google Scholar
• Ringdahl A, Eriksson-Mangold M, Andersson G. Psychometric evaluation of the Gothenburg profile for measurement of experienced hearing disability and handicap: applications with new hearing aid candidates and experienced hearing aid users. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 375–385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde M. Reasonable psychometric standards for self-report outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation. Ear Hearing 2000; 21: 24S–36S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorner J B, Damsgaard M T, Watt T, et al. The Danish SF-36 Health Survey: Translation and preliminary validity studies. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 991–999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes V, Morris J, Wolfe C, Morgan M. The SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire: is it suitable for use with older adults?. Age Ageing 1995; 24: 120–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill S, Harries U, Popay J. Is the short form 36 (SF-36) suitable for routine health outcomes assessment in health care for older people?. Evidence from preliminary work in community based health services in England. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996; 50: 94–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon H, So M. Incentives and obstacles to the routine use of outcome measures by clinicians. Ear and Hearing 2000; 21: 2S–6S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis A. The epidemiology of hearing in an ageing population. Principles and practices of geriatric medicine, 3rd edn, M SJ Pathy. John Wiley & Son, London
   Google Scholar