Cochlear Function and Speech Recognition in the Elderly: Funcián coclear y discriminación del lenguaje en los adultos mayores

References

• Willott J F. Aging and the auditory system. Singular Publishing Group Inc., San Diego 1991
   Google Scholar
• Schuknecht H E. Disorders of aging. Pathology of the ear, 2nd edn, H F Schuknecht. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia 1993; 415–446
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen C B. Brief tone audiometry in patients with acoustic trauma. Acta Otolaryngol 1973; 75: 332–333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen C B, Elberling C. Temporal integration of acoustic energy in patients with presbyacusis. Acta Otolaryngol 1973; 75: 32–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharf B. Comparison of normal and impaired hearing. II. Frequency analysis, speech perception. Scand Audiol 1978; 6: 81–106, Suppl
   Google Scholar
• Evans EF Recent advances in cochlear physiology. Otology, A Gibb, M FW Smith. Butterworth, London 1982; 104–114
   Google Scholar
• Tyler R S. Moore BCJ, ed. Frequency resolution in hearing-impaired listeners. Academic Press, London 1986; 309–371, Frequency selectivity in hearing
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. Auditory patterns. Rev Mod Phys 1940; 12: 47–85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker E. On a psychoacoustical equivalent of tuning curves. Facts and models in hearing, E Zwicker, E Terhardt. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg 1974; 132–140
   Google Scholar
• Vanden-Abeele D, Van de Heyning P H, Creten W, Graff A, Marquet J FE. Psychoacoustical tuning curves. Normative data for clinical use. Scand Audiol 1992; 21: 3–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brownell W E, Bader C R, Bertrand D, De Ribaupierre Y. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science 1985; 227: 194–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell W E. Outer hair cell electro-motility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 1990; 11: 82–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonfils P, Bertrand Y, Uziel A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data and presbyacusis. Audiology 1988; 27: 27–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Long G R, Tubis A. Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 1343–1353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deatherage B H, Bilger R C, Eldredge D H. Physiological evidence for the masking of low frequencies by high. J Acoust Soc Am 1957; 29: 132–137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervellera G, Quaranta A, Cassano P. Le “remote masking”: Un test de surdite de transmission cochleaire. Audiology 1978; 17: 317–323
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cervellera G, Quaranta A, Amoroso C. Clinical experience with remote masking. Audiology 1980; 19: 404–410
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McFadden S L, Quaranta N, Henderson D. Suprathreshold measures of auditory function in aging chinchilla. Hear Res 1997; 111(1-2)127–135
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergman E. Hearing and aging. An introduction and overview. Semin Speech, Language Hear 1985; 6: 99–112
   Google Scholar
• Hinchcliffe R. The threshold of hearing as a function of age. Acustica 1959; 9: 303–308
   Google Scholar
• Quaranta A, Salonna I, Longo G. Subclinical changes of the auditory function in the aged. Acta Otolaryngol 199 l;Suppl, 476: 91–96
   Google Scholar
• Schorn K, Zwicker E. Frequency selectivity and temporal resolution in patients with various inner ear disorders. Audiology 1990; 29: 8–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corso J F, Wright H N, Valerio M. Auditory temporal summation in pres Audiology, Volume 40 Ni byacusis and noise exposure. J Gerontol 1976; 31: 58–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wall L G, Stephenson M. Temporal integration and presbyacusis. J Audit Res 1982; 22: 210–215
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonding P. Critical bandwidth in presbyacusis. Scand Audiol 1979; 8: 43–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Florentine M, Buus S, Scharf B, Zwicker E. Frequency selectivity in normally hearing and hearing impaired observers. J Speech Hear Res 1980; 23: 646–669
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Margolis R H, Goldberg S M. Auditory frequency selectivity in normal and presbyacusis subjects. J Speech Hear Res 1980; 23: 603–613
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller G D. Comparison of critical ratios for two different age groups. Dissertation Abstracts Int 1981; 42: 555
   Google Scholar
• Patterson R D, Nimmo-Smith I, Weber D L, Milroy R. The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram and speech threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72: 1788–1803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutman M E. Degradation in frequency and temporal resolution with age and their impact on speech identification. Acta Otolaryngol 1991; 476: 120–126, Suppl
   Google Scholar
• Lutman M E, Gatehouse S, Worthington A G. Frequency resolution as a function of hearing threshold level and age. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 320–328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matschke R G. Frequency selectivity and psychoacoustical tuning curves in old age. Acta Otolaryngol 1991; 476: 114–119, Suppl
   Google Scholar
• Peters R W, Moore B CJ. Auditory filter shapes at low center frequencies in young and elderly hearing impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 256–266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaranta A, Amoroso C, Cervellera G. Remote masking in presbyacusis. J Audit Res 1978; 18: 125–129
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cutler W M, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. Effect of aging on acoustic-distortion product generation in humans. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstracts 1990; 13: 234
   Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, Cutler W M, Martin G K. Evidence for the influence of aging on distortion product oto-acoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust SocAm 1991; 89: 1749–1759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castor X, Veuillet E, Morgon A, Collet L. Influence of aging on active cochlear micromechanical properties and on the medial olivocochlear system in humans. Hear Res 1994; 77: 1–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferguson M A, Smith P A, Davis A C, Lutman M E. Transient-evoked oto-acoustic emissions in a representative population sample aged 18 to 25 years. Audiology 2000; 39: 125–134
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Satoh Y, Kanzaki J, O-Uchi T, Yoshihara S. Age-related changes in transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing ears. AurisNasus Larynx 1998; 25(2)121–130
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oeken J, Lenk A, Bootz F. Influence of age and presbyacusis on DPOAE. Acta Otolaryngol 2000; 120(3)396–403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stover L, Norton S J. The effect of aging on otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94(5)2670–2681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieve B A, Falter S R. COAEs and SSOAEs in adults with increased age. Ear Hear 1995; 16(5)521–528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn P A, Piskorski P, Keefe D H, Neely S T, Gorga M P. On the existence of an age/threshold/frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104(2 Pt 1)964–971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaranta N, Debole S. Effect of ageing on otoacoustic emissions and efferent suppression in humans. Audiology 2001; 40: 308–312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar