Performance of Adult Ineraid and Nucleus Cochlear Implant Patients after 3.5 Years of Use

References

• Dorman MF. Speech perception by adults. Cochlear Implants: Audiological Foundations, RS Tyler. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego 1993; 145–190
   Google Scholar
• Waltzman S B, Cohen N L, Shapiro W H. Long-term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usage. Laryngoscope 1986; 6: 1083–1087
   Google Scholar
• Gantz B J, Tyler R S, Knutson J F, Woodworth G, Abbas P, McCabe B F, Hinrichs J, Tye-Murray N, Lansing C, Kuk F, Brown C. Evaluation of five different cochlear implant designs: Audiologic assessment and predictors of performance. Laryngoscope 1988; 98: 1100–1106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R S, Lowder M W. Audiological management and performance of adult cochlear-implant patients. Ear NoseThroatJ 1992; 71: 117–128
   Google Scholar
• Waltzman S B, Cohen N L, Fisher S. An experimental comparison of cochlear implant systems. Semin Hear 1992; 13: 195–207
   Google Scholar
• Tyler R S, Tye-Murray N. Cochlear implant signal-processing strategies and patient perception of speech and environmental sounds; in Cooper H (ed): Practical Aspects of Cochlear Implants. Whurr, London 1991; 58–83
   Google Scholar
• Blarney P J, Dowell R C, Brown A M, Clark G M, Seligman P M. Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 48–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddington D K. Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68: 885–891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillman T W, Carhart R. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No 6. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Air Force Base. 1966, Technical report No SAM-TR-66–55
   Google Scholar
• Tyler R S, Preece J P, Tye-Murray N. The Iowa Phoneme and Sentence Tests. University of Iowa, Iowa City 1986
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B S. Signal Processing;. Cochlear Implants: Audiological Foundations., RS Tyler. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego 1993; 35–85
   Google Scholar
• Skinner M W, Holden L K, Holden T A, Dowell R C, Seligman P M, Bri-macombe J A, Beiter A L. Performance of postlinguistically deaf adults with the wearable speech processor (WSP III) and Mini Speech Processor (MSP) of the Nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 3–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick J F, Clark G M. The Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. EarHear l991; 12: 4–9, (suppltoNo4)
   Google Scholar
• Kim H, Shim YJ, Kim YM, Cho GJ, Moon SK. Comparison of speech recognition ability with different speech processing strategies by Korean cochlear implantees. Ann Otol Rhi-nolLaryngol 1992; 101: 659–664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R S, Lowder M W, Woodworth G, Gantz B J, Parkinson A J. A within-subject comparison of adult patients using the Nucleus F0F1F2and F0F1F2B3B4B5speech processing strategies'. Advances in Cochlear Implants., I J Hochmair-Desoyer, ES Hochmair. Manz, Vienna 1994; 131–135
   Google Scholar
• Tyler R S, Preece J P, Lowder M W. The Iowa Cochlear Implant Test Battery. University of Iowa, Iowa City 1983
   Google Scholar
• Miller G A, Nicely P E. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 1955; 27: 338–352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R S, Preece J P, Lansing C R, Gantz B J. Natural vowel perception by patients with the Ineraid cochlear implant. Audiology 1992; 31: 228–239
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tye-Murray N, Tyler R S, Wood-worth G G, Gantz B J. Performance over time with a Nucleus or Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 200–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R S, Opie J M, Fryauf-Bertschy H, Gantz B J. Future directions for cochlear implants. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 1992; 16: 151–164
   Google Scholar
• Thornton A, Raffin M JM. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res 1978; 21: 507–518
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang M D, Bilger R C. Consonant confusions in noise: A study of perceptual features. J Acoust Soc Am 1973; 54: 1248–1266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman M F, Hannley M T, Dan-kowski K, Smith L, McCandless G. Word recognition by 50 patients fitted with the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 44–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R S, Tye-Murray N, Moore B CJ, McCabe B F. Synthetic two-formant vowel perception by some of the better cochlear implant patients. Audiology 1989; 28: 301–315
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen N L, Waltzman S, Fisher S G, Department of Veterans Affairs Cochlear, Group Implant Study. A prospective randomized study of cochlear implants. New Engl J Med 1993; 328: 233–237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbas P J. Electrophysiology;. Cochlear Implants: Audiological Foundations., RS Tyler. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego 1993; 317–355
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B S, Lawson D T, Finley C C, Wolford R D. Coding strategies for multichannel cochlear prostheses. Am J Otol 1991; 12(suppl to No 1)56–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boëx C, Pelizonne M, Montandon P. Improvements in speech recognition with the CIS strategy for the Ineraid multichannel intracochlear implant;. Advances in Cochlear Implants., I J Hochmair-Desoyer, ES Hochmair. Manz, Vienna 1994; 136–140
   Google Scholar
• Zierhofer C, Peter O, Brill T, Czylok P, Pohl P, Hochmair-Desoyer I, Hochmair E. A multichannel cochlear implant system for high-rate pulsatile stimulation strategies;. Advances in Cochlear Implants., I J Hochmair-Desoyer, ES Hochmair. Manz, Vienna 1994; 204–207
   Google Scholar
• Skinner M W, Clark G M, Whitford L A, Seligman P M, Staller S J, Shipp D B, Shallop J K, Everingham C, Menapace C M, Arndt P L, Antoge-nelli B A, Brimacombe M A, Sipke P, Daniels P, George C R, McDermott H J, Bieter A L. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant system. Am J Otol 1994; 15(suppltoNo2)15–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar