References
- Yoshie N, Yamaura K. Cochlear microphonic responses to pure tones in man recorded by a non-surgical method. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1969; 252: 37–69, Suppl
- Elberling C. Some aspects of electrocochleography (ECoG). 1977; 489–495, Fadl, København
- Nishida N, Noguchi Y, Komatsuzaki A. Cochlear microphonics recordable at the non-shielded bedside using a new tubal transducer. Eur Arch ORL 1997; 254: 46–49, Suppl
- Nishida H. Artifacts in electrocochleography. ORL Tokyo 1983; 26: 753–757
- Coats A C. On electrocochleographic electrode design. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 22: 29–35
- Nishida H, Okada M, Tanaka Y. Delayed responses in electrocochleography. ECoG, OAE and Introaperative Monitoring, D Hohman. Kugler, Amsterdam 1993; 41–14
- Ponton C W, Don M, Eggermont J J. Place-specific derived cochlear microphonics from human ears. Scand Audiol 1992; 21: 131–141
- Matsuo T. Properties of recording electrodes connected through the input impedance of bioelectric amplifier. JJME 1970; 8: 347–352
- Stypulkowski P H, Staller S T. Clinical evaluation of a new ECoG recording electrode. Ear Hear 1987; 8: 304–310
- Crowley D E, Davis H, Beagley H A. Survey of the clinical use of electrocochleography. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1975; 84: 297–307
- Ferraro J A. Electrocochleography. What and why. Audiol Today 1992; 4: 25–27
- Eggermont J J, Odenthal D W, Schmidt P H, Spoor A. Electrocochleography. Basic principles and clinical application. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) Suppl 1974; 316: 17–24
- Noguchi Y, Nishida H, Komatsuzaki A. Evaluation of data in electrocochleography. Audiol Japan 1996; 39: 78–83
- Yoshie N. Diagnostic significance of the electrocochleogram in clinical audiometry. Audiology 1973; 12: 504–539
- Cullen J K, Ellis M S, Berlin C I, Lousteau R J. Human acoustic nerve action potential recordings for the tympanic membrane without anesthesia. Acta Otolaryngol 1972; 74: 15–22
- Berlin C I, Cullen J K, Ellis M S, Lousteau R J, Yarbrough W M, Lyons G D. Clinical application of recording human Vllth nerve action potentials from the tympanic membrane. Trans Acad Opthal Otol 1974; 78: 401–410
- Montandon P B, Megill N D, Kahn A R, Peake W T, Kiang N Y S. Recording auditory-nerve potentials as an office procedure. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1975; 84: 2–10
- Lilly D, Black F, Doucette S. A comparison of three noninvasive systems for electrocochleography. ASHA 1987; 29: 166, (A) p. 73
- Ferraro J, Ferguson R. Tympanic ECochG and conventional ABR: a combined approach for the identification of wave I and the 1-V interwave interval. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 161–166
- Margolis R H, Levine S C, Fournier E M, Hunter L L, Smith S L, Lilly D J. Tympanic electrocochleogaphy and abnormal patterns of response. Audiology 1992; 31: 18–24
- Tanaka Y, Nishida H, Okada M, Maseki M. Delayed responses of cochlear microphonics at lower sound levels. 32nd Workshop on Inner Ear Biology, Madrid. 1995; 50
- Maseki M. Experimental research on delayed responses in cochlear microphonics records in guinea pigs. J Otolaryngol 1996; 99: 79–90
- Nishida H, Tanaka Y, Okada M, Lnoue Y. Evoked otoacoustic emission and electrocochleography in a patient with multiple sclerosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104: 456–462
- Okada M, Nishida H, Tanaka Y. Evoked otoacoustic emissions and delayed microphonic potentials in human ears. ECoG, OAE and Introaperative Monitoring, D Höhman. Kugler, Amsterdam 1993; 196–200