References
- British Society of Audiology. Recommended procedure for uncomfortable loudness level. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 23
- McCleod H, Greenberg J. Relationship between loudness discomfort level and acoustic reflex threshold for normal and sensorineural hearing impaired individuals. J Speech Hear Res 1979; 22: 873–882
- Forquer B. The stability of and relation between acoustic reflex and uncomfortable loudness levels. J Am AudSoc 1979; 6: 161–166
- Greenfield D G, Wiley T L, Block M G. Acoustic reflex dynamics and the loudness discomfort level. J Speech Hear Disord 1985; 50: 14–20
- Kiessling J. Input-output function of the acoustic reflex and objective hearing aid evaluation. Audiology 1980; 19: 480–494
- Thornton A RD, Yardley L, Farrell G. The objective estimation of loudness discomfort level using auditory brainstem evoked responses. Scand Audiol 1987; 16: 219–225
- Thornton A RD, Farrell G, McSporran E L. Clinical methods for the objective estimation of loudness discomfort level (LDL) using auditory brainstem responses in patients. Scand Audiol 1989; 18: 225–230
- Fairfield S J. A study of the relationship between the auditory brainstem response and measures of loudness discomfort in a normally-hearing adult population. 1991, MSc Thesis, University of Manchester, UK
- Rickards F W, Clark G M. Steady-state evoked potentials to amplitude-modulated tones. Evoked Potentials, R H Nodar, C Barber. Butterworth, Boston 1984; Vol. Ill: 163–168
- Kuwada S, Batra R, Maher V L. Scalp potentials of normal and hearing impaired subjects in response to sinu-soidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hear Res 1986; 21: 179–192
- Rees A, Green G GR, Kay R H. Steady-state evoked responses to sinu-soidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man. Hear Res 1986; 23: 123–133
- Levi E C, Folsom R C, Dobie R A. Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age and state. Hear Res 1993; 68: 42–52
- Griffiths S K, Chambers R D. The amplitude-modulation following response as an audiometric tool. Ear Hear 1991; 12(4)235–24
- Cohen L T, Rickards F W, Clark G M. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust SocAm 1991; 90(5)2467–2479
- Levi E C, Folsom R C, Dobie R A. Coherence analysis of envelope-following responses (EFRs) and frequency-following responses (FFRs) in infants and adults. Hear Res 1995; 89: 21–27
- Parker D J, Matsebula D. The period evoked potential: a rapid technique for acquisition of phase-locked responses to continuous pure-tone stimulation. Br J Audiol 1992; 26: 335–338
- Dobie R A, Wilson M J. Objective response detection in the frequency domain. Electroenceph Clin. Neuro-physiol 1993; 88: 516–524
- Parker D J, Matsebula D. The period evoked potential: objective response detection and 500 Hz thresholds in normally-hearing adults. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 167–175
- Tucci D L, Wilson M J, Dobie R A. Coherence analysis of scalp responses to amplitude-modulated tones. Acta Otolaryngol 1990; 109: 195–201
- Brillinger D R. A note on the estimation of evoked response. Biol Cybernet 1978; 31: 141–144
- Nolan K J. Use of the period evoked potential in the prediction of loudness discomfort levels at 400 Hz. 1995, MSc Thesis, University of Manchester, UK
- Thornton A RD. Statistical properties of surface-recorded electrocochleo-graphic responses. Scand Audiol 1975; 4: 91–102
- Parker D J. Dependence of the auditory brainstem response on electrode location. 1981; 367–371, Arch Otolaryngol;107
- Picton T R, Skinner C R, Champagne S C, Kellet A JC, Maiste A C. Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82(1)165–178
- Dobie R A, Wilson M J. Objective detection of 40 Hz auditory evoked potentials: phase coherence vs. magnitude squared-coherence. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 92: 405–413
- Coats A C, Martin J L. Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 605–622
- Dobie R A, Wilson M J. Analysis of auditory evoked potentials by magnitude-squared coherence. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 2–13