Results of Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss—Implications for Patient Selection

References

• Wilson B S, Finley C C, Lawson D T, Wolford R D, Eddington D K, Rabinowitz W M. Better speech recognition with cochlear implant. Nature, 1991; 236–238
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B S, Lawson D T, Zerbi M, Finley C C, Wolford R D. New processing strategies in cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 1995; 16(5)669–675
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kessler D K, Schindler R A. Progress with a multi-strategy cochlear implant system: the Clarion TM. Advances in Cochlear Implants, I J Hochmair-Desoyer, E S Hochmair. Mainz, Wien 1994; 354–362
   Google Scholar
• Schindler R A, Kessler D K. Clarion cochlear implant: Phase I investigational results. Am J Otol, 1993; 263–272
   Google Scholar
• Lenarz T, Battmer R D. Comparison of 5 different speech coding strategies in noise, Speak. Third Paris International Cochlear Implant Conference, 1995, Abstract
   Google Scholar
• Battmer R D, Lenarz T. The performance of the Nucleus Spectra 22 and the Clarion CIS devices in quiet and in noise. Third Paris International Cochlear Implant Conference, 1995, Abstract
   Google Scholar
• Skinner M W, Clark G M, Whitford L A, Seligman P M, Staller S J, Shipp D B, Shallop J K, Everingham C, Menapace C M, Arndt P L, et al. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant system. Am J Otol 1994; 15: 15–27, (suppl. 2)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillier N, Battmer R D, Döring W H, Müller-Deile J. Multicentric field evaluation of a new speech coding strategy for cochlear implants. Audiology 1995; 34: 145–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer J, Müller J, Pfennigdorff T, Schon F, Helms J, von Ilberg C, Baumgartner W, Gstöttner W, Ehrenberger K, Arnold W, Stephan K, Thumfarth W, Baur S. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS Speech coding strategy (MED-EL COMBI-40) compared to the Multipeak and spectral peak strategies (Nucleus). ORL 1996; 58: 127–135
   Google Scholar
• Osberger M J, Miyamoto R T, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Kemink J, Stroer B S, Firszt J B, Novak M A. Independent evaluation of the speech perception abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-Channel Cochlear Implant System. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 66s–80s, (suppl.)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto R T, Osberger M J, Robbins A M, Myres W A, Kessler K, Pope M L. Comparison of speech perception abilities in deaf children with hearing aids or cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 104: 42–46, (l)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms J, Müller J, Schön F, Moser L, Arnold W, Janssen T, Ramsden R, von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, et al. Evaluation of Performance with the COMBI 40 cochlear implant in adults: a multicentric study. ORL 1997; 59: 23–35
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer J, Gall V, Desloovere C, Knecht R, Mikowski A, von Ilberg C. A follow up study of long term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1996; 253: 158–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brimacombe J A, Arndt P L, Staller S J, Beiter A L. Multichannel cochlear implantation in adults with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. Advances in Cochlear Implants, I J Hochmair-Desoyer, E Hochmair. Manz, Wien 1994; 387–392
   Google Scholar
• Shallop J K, Arndt P L, Turnacliff K A. Expanded indications for cochlear implantation: perceptual results in seven adults with residual hearing. J Speech Lang Path 1992; 16(2)141–148
   Google Scholar
• Rizer F M. Post operative audiometric evaluation of cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 98: 203–206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogess W J, Baker J E, Balkany T J. Loss of residual hearing after cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 1989; 99: 1002–1005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehnhardt E. Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique. HNO 1993; 41(7)356–359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogowski M, Reiss G, Lehnhardt E. Morphological study of the guinea pig cochlea after cochlear implantation using the ‘soft surgery’ technique. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 166: 434–436, (suppl.)
   Google Scholar
• Dye L, House W F, O'Connor C. Measurable residual hearing following cochlear implantation. Chicago. 1987, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology HNS
   Google Scholar
• Picton T W, Ouellette J, Hamel G, Smith A D. Brainstem evoked potentials to tonepips in notched noise. J Otolaryngol 1979; 8(4)289–314
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stürzebecher E, Heine S, Cebulla M, Wagner H, Schmiescheck J. Frequenzspezifische Hörschwellenmes-sung mittels Notched-noise-BERA bei Kindern. Otorhinolaryngol Nova 1995; 5: 300–306
   Google Scholar
• Stürzebecher E. Rationelle Hörschwel-lenbestimmung mittels Tonpuls-BERA mit Notched-Noise-Maskier-ung. Audiologische Akustik 1993; 32: 164–176
   Google Scholar
• Reid J, Lehnhurdt M. Speech perception test results for European children using the Nucleus cochlear implant. Advances in Cochlear Implants, I Hochmair, E Hochmair. Vienna, Manz, 522–527
   Google Scholar
• Erber N P, Alencewicz C M. Audiologic evaluation of deaf children. J Speech Hear Dis, 1976; 256–267
   Google Scholar
• Robbins A M, Renshaw J J, Berry S W. Evaluation of meaningful auditory information in profoundly hearing-impaired children. Am J Otol 1991; 12: 144–150, (suppl.)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark G M, Shute S A, Shepherd R K, Carter T D. Cochlear implantation: Osteoneogenesis, electrode-tissue impedance and residual hearing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (Suppl) 1995; 166: 40–42
   Google Scholar
• Marean G C, Burt J M, Beecher M D, Rubel E W. Hair cell regeneration in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): recovery of pure-tone detection thresholds. Hear Res 1993; 71: 125–36, (l-2)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotanche D A, Lee K H, Stone J S, Picard D A. Hair cell regeneration in the bird cochlea following noise damage or ototoxic drug damage. Anat Embryol 1994; 189(1)1–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsushima J I, Shepherd R K, Seldon H L, Xu S A, Clark G M. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in deaf kittens: Effect on cochlear nucleus morphology. Hear Res 1991; 56: 133–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouard C H, Meyer B, Josset P, Buche J F. The effect of the acoustic nerve chronic electric stimulation upon the guinea pig cochlear nucleus development. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1983; 95: 639–645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni D, Seldon H L, Shepherd R K, Clark G M. Effect of chronic electrical stimulation on cochlear nucleus neuron size in normal hearing kittens. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993; 113: 489–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leake P A, Snyder R L, Hradek G T, Rebscher S J. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location. Hear Res 1992; 64: 99–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinke R, Krai A, Heid S, Hartmann R. Chronic cochlear implantation in the deaf white cat. ARO Midwinter Meeting Feb. 15-19, 1998, Abstract 870
   Google Scholar