Auditory, Visual and Audiovisual Perception of Segmental Speech Features by Severely Hearing-impaired Children

References

• Pickett J M, Martin E S, Johnson D, Brandsmith S, Daniel Z, Otis W. On patterns of speech feature reception by deaf listeners. Speech Communication Ability and Profound Deafness, G Fant. A.G. Bell Association for the Deaf, Washington DC 1972
   Google Scholar
• Martony J M. Some psychoacoustic tests with hearing impaired children. STL-QPSR 1974; 3: 72–89, 2-(cited in Risberg A. Hearing loss and auditory capacity. Proceedings of Research Conference on Speech Processing Aids for the Deaf. Gallaudet College, Washington DC, 1977)
   Google Scholar
• Risberg A. Hearing loss and auditory capacity Proceedings of Research Conference on Speech Processing Aids for the Deaf. Washington DC, Gallaudet College 1977
   Google Scholar
• Hack Z C, Erber N P. Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual perception of vowels by hearing impaired children. J Speech Hear Res 1982; 25: 100–107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boothroyd A. Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27: 134–144
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamoré P JJ, Verweij C, Brocaar M P. Investigations of the residual hearing capacity of severely hearing-impaired and profoundly deaf subjects. Audiology 1985; 24: 343–361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby P A, Tong Y C, Clark G M. Underlying dimensions and individual differences in auditory, visual, and auditory-visual vowel perception by hearing impaired. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 75: 1858–1865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby P A, Tong Y C, Clark G M. Underlying structure of auditory-visual consonant perception by hearing-impaired children and the influence of syllabic compression. J Speech Hear Res 1988; 31: 156–165
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller G A, Nicely P E. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 1955; 27: 338–352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreschler W A, Plomp R. Relation between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing impaired subjects. I. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68: 1608–1615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreschler W A, Plomp R. Relation between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing impaired subjects. II. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 78: 1261–1270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens E, Blazek B. Visemes observed by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing adult viewers. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 28: 381–393
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Son N JDMM, Huiskamp T MI, Bosman A J, Smoorenburg G F. Viseme classifications of Dutch consonants and vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 96: 1341–1355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erber N P. Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual recognition of consonants by children with normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Hear Res 1972; 15: 413–422
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erber N P. Pure tone thresholds and word-recognition abilities of hearing-impaired children. J Speech Hear Res 1974; 17: 194–202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Binnie C A, Montgomery A A, Jackson P A. Auditory and visual contributions to the perception of consonants. J Speech Hear Res 1974; 17: 619–630
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson P M, Montgomery A A, Binnie C A. Perceptual dimensions underlying vowel lipreading performance. J Speech Hear Res 1976; 19: 796–812
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Summerfield A Q. Audiovisual speech perception, lipreading and artificial stimulation. Hearing Science and Hearing Disorders, M E Lutman, M P Haggard. Academic Press, London 1983; 131–182
   Google Scholar
• Seewald R C, Ross M, Giolas T G, Yonovitz A. Primary modality for speech perception in children with normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 28: 36–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breeuwer M. Speechreading supplemented with auditory information. Doctoral thesis. Free University Amsterdam, The Netherlands 1985
   Google Scholar
• Breeuwer M. Speechreading supplemented with auditorily presented speech parameters. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 481–499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blarney P J, Cowan R S, Alcantara J I, Whitford L A, Clark G M. Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual and tactile information. J Rehabil Res Dev 1989; 26: 15–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Son N JDMM. Speech processing strategies for the profoundly hearing impaired Doctoral thesis. The Netherlands, University Utrecht 1993
   Google Scholar
• Bosman A J. Speech perception by the hearing impaired. Doctoral thesis. University Utrecht, The Netherlands 1989
   Google Scholar
• Carroll J D, Chang J J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of Eckart Young decomposition. Psychometrika 1970; 35: 283–319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A. Speech perception and sensorineural hearing loss. Auditory Management of Hearing-Impaired Children, M Ross, T G Giolas. University Park Press., Baltimore 1978; 117–144
   Google Scholar
• Van Nierop D JPJ, Pols L CW, Plomp R. Frequency analysis of Dutch vowels from 25 female speakers. Acustica 1973; 29: 110–118
   Google Scholar
• Lamore P JJ, Verweij C, Brocaar M P. Reliability of auditory function tests in severely hearing-impaired and deaf subjects. Audiology, 1984; 453–466
   Google Scholar
• Bosman A J. Relations between phoneme scores and syllable scores for normal-hearing and hearing impaired subjects. The Auditory Processing of Speech: From Sounds to Words, M EH Schouten. Mouton de Gruyter., Berlin, New York 1992; 357–362
   Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst A W, Bosman A J, Smoorenburg G F. A model for context effects in speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G F. Het spraakaudio-gram in relatie tot de gebruikte meetmethode. Laryng Rhino Otol 1991; 70: 123–131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorga M P, Neely S T, Bergman B M, Beauchaine K L, Kaminski J R, Peters J, Schulte L, Jestead W. A comparison of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2639–2648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stover L, Gorga M P, Neely S T, Montoya D. Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 100(2)956–976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R, Coats A C, Martin G K, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Spontaneous, click-and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears. Hear Res 1986; 261–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton S J, Neely S T. Tone-burst evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 81: 1860–1872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stover L, Norton S J. The effects of aging on otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2670–2681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R, Harris F P. Transiently evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Comparison of results from normally hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119: 858–860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser R, Probst R, Lohle E. Click-and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing ears with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhino-laryngol 1991; 248: 345–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka Y, Suzuki M, Inoue T. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in sensorineural hearing impairment: its clinical implications. Ear Hear 1990; 11(2)134–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R, Jerger J F. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Dis 1959; 24: 330–345
   Google Scholar
• Harris F P, Probst R. Otoacoustic emissions and audiometric outcomes. Otoacoustic Emissions, M S Robinette, T J Glattke. Thieme, New York 1997; 151–180, Clinical Applications
   Google Scholar
• Avan P, Bonfils P, Loth D, Narcy P, Trotoux J. Quantitative assessment of human cochlear function by evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1991; 52: 99–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein V, Stapells D R. Frequency specific identification of hearing loss using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions to clicks and tones. Hear Res 1996; 98: 1–2, ( ): 125–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris F P, Probst R. Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with Meniere's disease. Acta Otolaryngol 1992; 112: 36–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet L, Levy V, Veuillet E, Truy E, Morgon A. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold in sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 141–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Standards Organization. Acoustics -Standard Reference Zero for the Calibration of Pure-Tone Audiometers. ISO 389, GenevaSwitzerland 1975
   Google Scholar