Auditory Neuropathy with Preserved Cochlear Microphonics and Secondary Loss of Otoacoustic Emissions

References

• Starr A, Picton T W, Sininger Y S, Hood L J, Berlin C I. Auditory neuropathy. Brain 1996; 119: 741–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr A, McPherson D, Patterson J, et al. Absence of both auditory evoked potentials and auditory percepts dependent on timing cues. Brain 1991; 114: 1157–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H. An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 1983; 9: 79–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashmore J F. A fast motile response in guinea-pig outer hair cells: the cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier. J Physiol 1987; 388: 323–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aran J M, Charlet de Sauvage R. Clinical value of cochlear microphonic recordings. Electrococh-leography, R J Ruben, C Elberling, G Salomon. University Park Press, Baltimore 1976; 55–65
   Google Scholar
• Dallos P, Wang C Y. Bioelectric correlates of kanamycin intoxication. Audiology 1974; 13: 277–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein L, Tremblay K, Pasternak J, Banerjee S, Lindemann K, Kraus N. Brainstem abnormalities in neonates with normal otoacoustic emissions. Sem Hear 1996; 17: 197–213
   Google Scholar
• Deltenre P, Mansbach A L, Bozet C, Clercx A, Hecox K E. Auditory neuropathy: a report on three cases with early onsets and major neonatal illnesses. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 104: 17–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berlin C I, Bordelon J, St John J, et al. Reversing click polarity may uncover auditory neuropathy in infants. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 37–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katona G, Buki B, Farkas Z, Pytel J, Simon-Nagy E, Hirshberg J. Transitory evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) in a child with profound hearing loss. Int J Ped Otorhino-laryngol 1993; 26: 263–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangos N, Mausolf A. Familiäre neurale mitochondriale Schwerhörigheit. HNO 1990; 38: 322–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norton S J. Application of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions to pediatric populations. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 64–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vohr B, White K, Maxon A, Johnson M. Factors affecting the interpretation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission results in neonatal screening. Sem Hear 1993; 14: 57–72
   Google Scholar
• Konradsson K S. Bilaterally preserved otoacoustic emissions in four children with profound idiopathic unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1996; 35: 217–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Welzl-Müller K, Stephan K, Stadmann A. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a child with unilateral deafness. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1993; 250: 366–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laccourreye L, Tran B, Huy E, François M, Narcy P. Bilateral evoked otoacoustic emissions in a child with bilateral profound hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996; 105: 286–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaga K, Nakamura M, Shinogami M, Tzuzuku T, Yamada K, Shindo M. Auditory nerve disease of both ears revealed by auditory brainstem responses, electrocochleography and otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1996; 25: 233–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinette M S, Durrant J D. Contributions of evoked otoacoustic emissions in differential diagnosis of retrocochlear disorders. Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications, M S Robinette, T J Glattke. Thieme, New York and Stuttgart 1997; 205–32
   Google Scholar
• Starr A, Sininger Y, Winter M, Derebery M J, Michalewski H J. Transient deafness due to temperature-sensitive auditory neuropathy. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 169–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin C I, Hood L J, Cecola R P, Jackson D F, Szabo P. Does type I afferent neuron dysfunction reveal itself through lack of efferent suppression?. Hear Res 1993; 65: 40–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin C I, Hood L J, Hurley A, Wen H. Hearing aids: only for hearing-impaired patients with abnormal otoacoustic emissions. Hair Cells and Hearing Aids, C I Berlin. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego 1995; 99–111
   Google Scholar
• Margolis R H, Trine M B. Influence of middle-ear disease on otoacoustic emissions. Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications, M S Robinette, T J Glattke. Thieme, New York and Stuttgart 1997; 130–50
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki T, Ogiba Y. Conditioned orientation reflex audiometry. A new technique for pure-tone audiometry in young children under 3 years of age. Arch Otolaryngol 1961; 74: 192–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khomsi A. Epreuve ďévaluation des stratégies de compréhension en situation orale. Paris, Les Editions du centre de psychologie appliquée 1987
   Google Scholar
• Khomsi A. A syntax comprehension test. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol Bord 1978; 99: 459–66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee L. The Northwestern Syntax Screening Test. Northwestern University Press, Evanston Ill 1969
   Google Scholar
• Lee L. A screening test for syntax development. J Speech Hear Dis 1970; 35: 105–12
   Google Scholar
• Deltenre P, Mansbach A L. Effects of click polarity on the brainstem auditory evoked potentials in cochlear hearing loss: a working hypothesis. Audiology 1995; 34: 17–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray P, Kemp D T. An advanced cochlear echotechnique suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 191–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stromswold K. The cognitive and neural bases of language acquisition. The Cognitive Neurosciences, M S Gazzaniga. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass 1995; 855–70
   Google Scholar
• Deltenre P, Mansbach A L, Bozet C, Clercx A, Hecox K E. Temporal distortion products (kernel slices) evoked by maximum-length-sequences in auditory neuropathy: evidence for a cochlear presynaptic origin. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 104: 10–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein L, McGee T, Tremblay K, Kraus N, Cheatham M A. Auditory neuropathy associated with elevated bilirubin levels. 1997, Poster ARO
   Google Scholar
• Zakrisson J E. The role of the stapedius reflex in post-stimulatory auditory fatigue. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh. 1975; 79: 1–10
   Google Scholar
• Rajan R. Effects of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. I. Dependence on electrical stimulation parameters. J Neuro-physiol 1998; 60: 549–68
   Google Scholar
• Rajan R. Effects of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. II. Dependence on the level of temporary threshold shifts. J Neurophysiol 1998; 60: 569–79
   Google Scholar
• Reiter E R, Liberman M C. Efferent-mediated protection from acoustic overexposure: relation to slow effects of olivocochlear stimulation. J Neurophysiol 1995; 73: 506–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R, Fryauf-Bertschy H, Kelsay D M, Gantz B J, Woodworth G P, Parkinson A. Speech perception by prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117: 180–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin B, Martin G K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 2027–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker E. Delayed evoked oto-acoustic emissions and their suppression by Gaussian-shaped pressure impulses. Hear Res 1983; 11: 659–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeve S L, Margolis R H, Levine S C, Fournier E M. Effect of ear-canal air pressure on evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 2091–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terkildsen K, Osterhammel P, Huis int Veld F. Electrocochleography with a far field technique. Scand Audiol 1973; 2: 141–8
   Google Scholar
• Evans B N, Dallos P. Stereocilia displacement: induced somatic motility of cochlear outer hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 8347–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dealer R, Shehata-Dieler W E, Brownell W E. Concomitant salicylate-induced alterations of outer hair cell subsurface cisternae and electro-motility. J Neurocytol 1991; 20: 637–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feghali J G, Lefebvre P P, Staecker H, Kopke R, Frenz D A, Malgrange B, Liu W, Moonen G, Ruben R J, Van de Water T R. Mammalian auditory hair cell regeneration/repair and protection: a review and future directions. Ear Nose Throat J 1998; 77: 276–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller J M, Chi D H, Okeefe L J, Kruszka P, Raphael Y, Altschuler R A. Neurotrophins can enhance spiral ganglion cell survival after inner hair cell loss. Int J Dev Neurosci 1997; 15: 631–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X Y, Ding D L, McFadden S, Henderson D. Evidence that inner hair cells are the major source of cochlear summating potential. Hear Res 1997; 113: 76–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar