References
- Berlin C. I., Lowe‐Bell S. S., Cullen J. K., Thompson C. L. Dichotic speech perception: An interpretation of right‐ear advantage and temporal offset effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1974; 53: 699–709
- Bruder G. E. Cerebral laterality and psychopathology: A review of dichotic listening studies. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1983; 9: 134–151
- Bryden M. P., Sprott D. A. Statistical determination of degree of laterality. Neuropsychologia 1981; 19: 571–581
- Bryden M. P. An overview of the dichotic listening procedure and its relation to cerebral organization. Handbook of Dichotic Listening: Theory, Methods and Research, K. Hugdahl. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1988; 1–43
- Hiscock M., Stewart C. The effect of asymmetrically focused attention upon subsequent ear differences in dichotic listening. Neuropsychologia 1984; 22: 337–351
- Kimura D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1961; 15: 166–171
- Marshall J. C., Caplan D., Holmes J. M. The measure of laterality. Neuropsychologia 1975; 13: 315–321
- Porter R. J., Jr., Troendle R., Berlin C. I. Effects of practice on the perception of dichotically presented stop‐consonant‐vowel syllables. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 1976; 59: 679–682
- Repp B. H. Measuring laterality effects in dichotic listening. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 1977; 62: 720–737
- Speaks C., Niccum N., Carney E., Johnson C. Stimulus dominance in dichotic listening. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1981; 24: 430–437
- Speaks C. Statistical properties of dichotic listening scores. Handbook of Dichotic Listening: Theory, Methods and Research, K. Hugdahl. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1988; 186–213
- Speaks C., Niccum N., Leathers R., Katsuki‐Nakamura J. Comparison of target monitoring and two‐ear monitoring dichotic listening procedures. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 1989; 85: 2053–2058
- Studdert‐Kennedy M., Shankweiler D. Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 1970; 48: 579–594