Spatial vision in adults and infants: A tribute to russell harter

References

• Abramov I., Gordon J., Hendrickson A., Hainline L., Dobson V., LaBossiere E. The retina of the newborn human infant. Science 1982; 217: 265–267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson J., Braddick O., Braddick F. Acuity and contrast sensitivity of infant vision. Nature 1974; 247: 403–404
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atkinson J., Braddick O., Moar K. Development of contrast sensitivity over the first 3 months of life in the human infant. Vision Research 1977; 17: 1037–1044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson J., Braddick O., French J. Contrast sensitivity of the human neonate measured by the visual evoked potential. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 1979; 18: 210–213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baitch L. W., Lewi D. W., Levi D. M. Evidence for nonlinear binocular interactions in human visual cortex. Vision Research 1988; 28: 1139–1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baitch L. W., Srebro R. Failure to of monocular nonlinearity in binocularly abnormal humans. Investigative Ophthalmology and Vision Science 1992; 1340, (Suppl. 33)
   Google Scholar
• Banks M. S., Salapatek P. Contrast sensitivity function of the infant visual system. Vision Research 1976; 16: 867–869
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barber C., Galloway N. R. Adaptation effects in the transient visual evoked potential. Human evoked potentials, D. Lehmann, E. Galloway. Plenum, New York 1979; 17–30; 17–30
   Google Scholar
• Beraldi N., Bisti S., Cattaneo A., Fiorentini A., Maffei L. Correlation between the preferred orientation and spatial frequency of neurones in visual areas 17 and 18 of the cat. Journal of Physiology 1982; 323: 603–618
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergen J. R. Theories of visual texture perception. Spatial vision, D. Regan. Macmillan, London 1991; 114–134
   Google Scholar
• Blakemore C., Campbell F. W. On the existence of neurons in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. Journal of Physiology 1969; 203: 237–260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braddick O. J. The masking of apparent motion in random dot patterns. Vision Research 1973; 13: 355–369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braddick O. J., Campbell F. W., Atkinson J. Channels in vision. Basic aspects. Handbook of sensory physiology, (Perception, Vol. VIII), R. Held, H. I. Leibowitz, H. L. Teuber. Springer, Berlin 1978
   Google Scholar
• Bradley A., Switkes E., DeValois K. K. Orientation and spatial frequency selectivity of adaptation to color and luminance patterns. Vision Research 1988; 28: 841–856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeValois K. K., Switkes E. Simultaneous masking interactions between chromatic and luminance gratings. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1983; 73: 11–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fiorentini A., Pirchio M., Sandini G. Developments of retinal acuity in infants evaluated with the electro-retinogram. Human Neurobiology 1984; 3: 93–96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giaschi D., Regan D., Kothe A. C., Hong X. H., Sharpe J. A. Motion-defined letter detection and recognition in patients with multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology 1992, In press
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harter M. R. Evoked cortical response to checkerboard patterns: effect of check size as a function of retinal eccentricity. Vision Research 1970; 10: 1365–1376
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harter M. R. Visually evoked cortical potentials to the on-and offset of patterned light in humans. Vision Research 1971; 11: 685–695
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harter M. R. Binocular interaction: evoked potentials to dichopic stimulation. Visual evoked potentials in man, J. E. Desmedt. Clarendon, Oxford 1977; 208–233
   Google Scholar
• Harter M. R., White C. T. Effects of contour sharpness and check size on visually evoked cortical potentials. Vision Research 1968; 8: 701–711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter M. R., White C. T. Evoked cortical responses to checkerboard patterns. Effect of check size as a function of visual acuity. Electroencephology and Clinical Neurophysiology 1970; 28: 48–54
   Google Scholar
• Harter M. R., Seiple W. H., Salmon L. Binocular summation of visually evoked responses to pattern stimuli in humans. Vision Research 1973; 13: 1433–1446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter M. R., Towle V. L., Musso M. F. Size specificity and intraocular suppression. Vision Research 1976; 16: 1111–1117
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He P., Regan D. Magnetic responses of the brain to texture-defined form: Dissociation of responses to form and to texture. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 1992; 834, (Suppl. 33)
   Google Scholar
• Julesz B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. University of Chicago. 1971
   Google Scholar
• Julesz B., Tyler C. W. Neurontropy, an entropy-like measure of neural correlation in binocular fusion and rivalry. Biological Cybernetics 1976; 22: 107–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julesz B., Kropfl W., Petrig B. Large evoked potentials to dynamic random dot correlograms and stereograms permit quick determination of stereopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 1980; 77: 2348–2351
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaplan E., Shapley R. M. X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys. Journal of Physiology 1982; 330: 125–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulikowski J. J., Murray I. J., Parry N. R. A. Electrophysiological correlates of chromatic-opponent and achromatic stimulation in man. Colour vision deficiencies, B. Drum, G. Verriest. Kluwer, Dordrecht 1989; IX
   Google Scholar
• Marg E., Freeman D. N., Peltzman P., Goldstein P. J. Visual acuity development in human infants: Evoked potential measurements. Investigative Ophthalmology 1976; 15: 150–153
   Google Scholar
• Merigan W. H. Chromatic and achromatic vision of macaques: Role of the P pathway. Journal of Neuroscience 1989; 9: 776–783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merigan W. H., Eskin T. A. ASpatio-temporal A vision of macaques with severe loss of Pb retinal ganglion cells. Vision Research 1986; 26: 1751–1761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merigan W. H., Maunsell J. H. R. Macaque vision after magnocellular lateral geniculate lesions. Visual Neuroscience 1990; 5: 347–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan M. J. Positional acuity without monocular cues. Perception 1986; 15: 157–162
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mullen K. T. The contrast sensitivity of human colour vision to red-green and blue-yellow chromatic gratings. Journal of Physiology 1985; 359: 381–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustillo P., Francis E., Oross S., Fox R., Orban G. A. Anisotropics in global stereoscopic orientation discrimination. Vision Research 1988; 28: 1315–1321
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakayama K., Tyler C. W. Psychophysical isolation of movement sensitivity by removal of familiar position cues. Vision Research 1981; 21: 427–433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson J. I., Seiple W. H., Kupersmith M. J., Carr R. E. A rapid evoked potential index of cortical adaptation. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 1984; 59: 454–464
   Google Scholar
• Norcia A. M., Tyler C. W. Infant VEP acuity measurements: Analysis of individual differences and measurement error. Electroencephology and Clinical Neurophysiology 1985a; 61: 359–369
   Google Scholar
• Norcia A. M., Tyler C. W. Spatial frequency sweep VEP: Visual acuity during the first year of life. Vision Research 1985b; 25: 1399–1408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcia A. M., Tyler C. W., Allen D. Electrophysiological assessment of contrast sensitivity in human infants. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 1986; 63: 12–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norcia A. M., Tyler C. W., Harner R. D. High visual contrast sensitivity in the young human infant. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences 1988; 29: 44–49
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pirchio M., Spinelli D., Fiorentini A., Maffei L. Infant contrast sensitivity evaluated by evoked potentials. Brain Research 1978; 141: 179–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porciati V. Temporal and spatial properties of the pattern reversal VEPs in infants below 2 months of age. Human Neurobiology 1984; 3: 97–102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D. A study of the visual system by the correlation of light stimuli and evoked electrical responses. Imperial College, London 1964, Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Regan D. Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. Electroencephology and Clinical Neurophysiology 1966; 20: 238–248
   Google Scholar
• Regan D. Evoked Potentials in Psychology, Sensory Physiology and Clinical Medicine. Chapman & Hall, London 1972; 328, New York: Wiley. Reprinted in 1975
   Google Scholar
• Regan D. Rapid objective refraction using evoked brain potentials. Investigative Ophthalmology 1973; 12: 669–679
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D. Electrophysiological evidence for colour channels in human pattern vision. Nature 1974; 250: 437–439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D. Colour coding of pattern responses in man investigated by evoked potential feedback and direct plot techniques. Vision Research 1975a; 15: 175–183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D. Recent advances in electrical recording from the human brain. Nature 1975b; 253: 401–407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D. Speedy assessment of visual acuity in amblyopia by the evoked potential method. Ophthalmologica 1977; 175: 159–164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D. Speedy evoked potential methods for assessing vision in normal and amblyopic eyes: Pros and cons. Vision Research 1980; 20: 265–269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D. Spatial frequency mechanisms in human vision investigated by evoked potential recording. Vision Research 1983; 23: 1401–1408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D. Form from motion parallax and form from luminance contrast: Vernier discrimination. Spatial Vision 1986; 1: 305–318
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D. Orientation discrimination for objects defined by relative motion and objects defined by luminance contrast. Vision Research 1989a; 29: 1389–1400
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D. Human brain electrophysiology: evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine. Elsevier, New York 1989b; 672
   Google Scholar
• Regan D. Detection and spatial discriminations for objects defined by colour contrast, binocular disparity and motion parallax. Spatial vision, D. Regan. Macmilian, London 1991; 135–178
   Google Scholar
• Regan D., Beverley K. I. The dissociation of sideways movements from movements in depth: psy-chophysics. Vision Research 1973; 13: 2403–2415
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D., Beverley K. I. Figure-ground segregation by motion-contrast and by luminance-contrast. Journal of the Optical Society of American A 1984; 1: 433–442
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D., Hamstra S. Shape discrimination for motion-defined and contrast-defined form: squareness is special. Perception 1991; 20: 315–336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D., Hamstra S. Dissociation of orientation discrimination from form detection for motion-defined bars and luminance-defined bars: effects of dot lifetime and presentation duration. Vision Research 1992; 32: 1655–1666
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D., Hamstra S. Shape discrimination for rectangles defined by disparity alone, by disparity plus luminance and by disparity plus motion. Vision Research 1993; 34: 2277–2291
   Google Scholar
• Regan D., Hamstra S. Orientation discrimination in cyclopean vision. Vision Research 1994, in press
   Google Scholar
• Regan D., He P. Magnetic brain responses to chromatic contrast in human. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 1993; 794, (Suppl. 34)
   Google Scholar
• Regan D., Maxner C. Orientation-dependent loss of contrast sensitivity for pattern and flicker in multiple sclerosis. Clinical Vision and Science 1986; 1: 1–23
   Google Scholar
• Regan D., Regan M. P. “Dissecting” the visual and auditory pathways by means of the two-input technique. Proceedings of the conference on electric and magnetic activity of the central nervous system, Trondheim, Norway. AGARD Conference Proceedings 1987a; 432(6)1–9
   Google Scholar
• Regan D., Regan M. P. Nonlinearity in human visual responses to two-dimensional patterns and limitations of fourier methods. Vision Research 1987b; 27: 2181–2183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D., Regan M. P. Objective evidence for phase-independent spatial frequency analysis in the human visual pathway. Vision Research 1988; 28: 187–191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D., Spekreijse H. Electrophysiological correlate of binocular depth perception in man. Nature 1970; 255: 92–94
   Google Scholar
• Regan D., Spekreijse H. Evoked potential indications of colour blindness. Vision Research 1974; 14: 89–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D., Kothe A. C., Sharpe J. A. Recognition of motion-defined shapes in patients with multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis. Brain 1991; 114: 1129–1155
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan D., Silver R., Murray T. J. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis - hidden visual loss. Brain 1977; 100: 563–579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D., Giaschi D., Sharpe J. A., Hong X. H. Visual processing of motion-defined form: Selective failure in patients with parieto-temporal lesions. Journal of Neuroscience 1992; 12: 2198–2210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D., Whitlock J. A., Murray T. J., Beverley K. I. Orientation specific losses of contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 1980; 19: 324–328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D., Schellart N. A. M., Spekreijse H., Van den Berg T. J. T. P. Photometry in goldfish by electrophysiological recording: comparison of criterion response method with heterochromatic flicker photometry. Vision Research 1975; 15: 799–807
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan M. P., Regan D. Monocular and binocular nonlinearities in flicker evoked potentials. Third International Evoked Potential Symposium, Berlin, 1986, (abstracts)
   Google Scholar
• Regan M. P., Regan D. A frequency domain technique for characterizing nonlinearities in biological systems. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1988; 133: 293–317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan M. P., Regan D. Objective investigation of visual function using a nondestructive zoom-FFT technique for evoked potential analysis. Canadian Journal of Neurological Science 1989; 16: 168–179
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shapley R. M., Perry V. H. Cat and monkey retinal ganglion cells and their visual functional roles. Trends in Neuroscience 1986; 9: 229–235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokol S. Measurement of infant visual acuity form pattern reversal evoked potentials. Vision Research 1978; 18: 33–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spekreijse H., Van der Tweel L. H., Regan D. Intraocular sustained suppression: correlations with evoked potential amplitude and distribution. Vision Research 1972; 12: 521–526
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swift D. J., Smith R. An action spectrum for spatial frequency adaptation. Vision Research 1982; 22: 235
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Switkes E., Bradley A., De Valois K. K. Contrast dependence and mechanisms of masking interactions among chromatic and luminance gratings. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1988; 5A: 1149–1162
   Google Scholar
• Towle V. L., Harter M. R., Previc F. H. Binocular interaction of orientation and spatial frequency channels: evoked potentials and observer sensitivity. Perception and Psychophysics 1980; 27: 351–360
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler C. W. Depth perception in disparity gratings. Nature 1974; 25: 140–142
   Google Scholar
• Webster M. A., De Valois K. K., Switkes E. Orientation and spatial frequency discrimination for luminance and chromatic gratings. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1990; 7A: 1034–1049
   Google Scholar
• White C. T. Evoked cortical potentials and patterned stimuli. American Psychology 1969; 24: 212–214
   Google Scholar
• White C. T., Eason R. G. Evoked cortical potentials in relation to certain aspects of visual perception. Psychology Monographs 1966; 80(No. 24)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar