The Cds Disc Method of Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing (Calibrated Dichotomous Sensitivity Test)

References

• Anderson T. G., Troyanosky A. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by the disc method. Antibiot. Ann. 1960; 587, 1959–1960
   Google Scholar
• Annear D. I. The effect of temperature on resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to methicillin and some other antibiotics. Med. J. Aust. 1968; 1: 444
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Association of Clinical Pathologists. Report on antibiotic sensitivity test trial organized by the Bacteriology Committee of the Association of Clinical Pathologists. J. clin. Path. 1965; 18: 1
   Google Scholar
• Ayliffe G. A. J., Barber M. Inactivation of benzylpenicillin and methicillin by hospital staphylococci. Brit. med. J. 1963; 2: 202
   Google Scholar
• Barber M. Naturally occurring methicillinresistant staphylococci. J. gen. Microbiol. 1964; 35: 183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barber Mary, Stokes Joan E. Antibiotic Sensitivity Tests. Association of Clinical Pathologists, London 1966, Broadsheet No. 55
   Google Scholar
• Barrett F. F., Read F., McGehee M. D., Finland M. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at Boston City Hospital. New Engl. J. Med. 1968; 279: 441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry A. L., Garcia F., Thrupp L. D. An improved single-disk method for testing the antibiotic susceptibility of rapidlygrowing pathogens. Amer. J. clin. Path. 1970; 53: 149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauer A. W., Perry D. M., Kirby W. M. M. Single-disk antibiotic-sensitivity testing of staphylococci. Arch. int. Med. 1959; 104: 208
   Google Scholar
• Bauer A. W., Roberts C. E., Kirby W. M. M. Single disc versus multiple disc and plate dilution techniques for antibiotic sensitivity testing. Antibiot. Ann. 1960; 574, 1959–1960
   Google Scholar
• Bauer A. W. The significance of bacterial inhibition zone diameters: A study of the factors influencing antibiotic disc sensitivity tests. Proc. 3rd Int. Congr. Chemo., Stuttgart, 1964, 466
   Google Scholar
• Bauer A. W., Kirby W. M. M., Sherris J. C., Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Amer. J. clin. Path. 1966; 45: 493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell S. M. Microbiology Survey. 1970, Board of Education Report of Surveys. Royal Coll. Path. Aust., Sydney
   Google Scholar
• Bell S. M. Microbiology Survey. Sydney 1971, Board of Education Report of Surveys. Royal Coll. Path. Aust.
   Google Scholar
• Bell S. M. Microbiology Survey. Sydney 1972, Board of Education Report of Surveys. Royal Coll. Path. Aust.
   Google Scholar
• Bell S. M. Microbiology Survey. Sydney 1973, Board of Education Report of Surveys. Royal Coll. Path. Aust.
   Google Scholar
• Bell S. M. The significance of sensitivity tests of Staphylococcus aureus to cephaloricline. Med. J. Aust. 1974; 2: 902
   Google Scholar
• Bell S. M., Smith D. D. Ampicillinresistant Haemophilus influenzae, type b. Med. J. Aust. 1975; 1: 517
   Google Scholar
• British Medical Journal, Editorial. Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Brit. med. J. 1971; 2: 416
   Google Scholar
• Brumfitt W., Pursell R. Observations on bacterial sensitivities to nalidixic acid and critical comments on the 6-centre survey. Postgrad, med. J. 1971; 47(suppl.)16
   Google Scholar
• Castle A. R., Elstub J. Antibiotic sensitivity testing: a survey undertaken in September 1970 in the United Kingdom. J. clin. Path. 1971; 24: 773
   Google Scholar
• College Of Pathologists Of Australia. A survey of antibiotic sensitivity testing. Med. J. Aust. 1968; 2: 171
   Google Scholar
• Cooper K. E., Woodman D. The diffusion of antiseptics through agar gels, with special reference to the agar cup assay method of estimating the activity of penicillin. J. Path. Bact. 1946; 58: 75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooper K. E., Gillespie W. A. The influence of temperature on streptomycin inhibition zones in agar cultures. J. gen. Microbiol. 1952; 7: 1
   Google Scholar
• Edwards C. C. Antibiotic susceptibility discs. Fed. Register. 1971; 36: 6899
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson H., Hogman C., Wickman K. A paper disk method for determination of bacterial sensitivity to chemotherapeutic and antibiotic agents. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1954; 6(suppl. 11)23
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson H., Tunevall G., Wickman K. The paper disc method for determination of bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1960; 12: 414
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ericsson H. M., Sherris J. C. Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Acta path. microbiol. scand. 1971; 217(suppl)
   Google Scholar
• Fleming A. On the antibacterial action of cultures of a penicillium with special reference to their use in the isolation of B. influenzae. Brit. J. exp. Path. 1929; 10: 226
   Google Scholar
• Foley J. N., Perret C. J. Screening bacterial colonies for penicillinase production. Nature (Lond.). 1962; 195: 287
   Google Scholar
• Garrod L. P., Waterworth Pamela M. A study of antibiotic sensitivity testing with proposals for simple uniform methods. J. clin. Path. 1971; 24: 779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavan T. L. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Med. Clin. N. Amer. 1974; 58: 493
   Google Scholar
• Hansman D., Glasgow H. N., Stuart J., et al. Penicillin-insensitive pneumococci in Australia and New Guinea. New Engl. J. Med. 1971; 234: 175
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey J. H., Lightbown J. W. ); A general theory for plate assay of antibiotics with some practical applications. J. gen. Microbiol. 1952; 7: 129
   Google Scholar
• Khan W., Ross S., Rodriguez W., et al. Haemophilus influenzae Type B resistant to ampicillin. J. Amer. med., ASS. 1974; 229: 298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby W. M. M., Yoshihara G. M., Sundsted K. S., Warren J. H. Clinical usefulness of a single disc method for antibiotic sensitivity testing. Antibiot. Ann. 1957; 892, 1956–1957
   Google Scholar
• Knox R., Smith J. T. Use of cellulose acetate membranes for detecting penicillinase-producing organisms. Nature (Lond). 1961; 191: 926
   Google Scholar
• Lavine D., Hurst V., Grossman M., Lee M. Staphylococcus of a newly recognized bacteriophage type. J. Amer. med. Ass. 1965; 192: 935
   Google Scholar
• Maisen J. M., Koepcke M. J. H., Quie P. G. Evaluation of the Bauer-Kirby-Sherris-Turck single-disc diffusion method of antibiotic susceptibility testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1969; 9: 445
   Google Scholar
• Miles A. A., Misra S. S. The estimation of the bactericidal power of blood. J. Hyg. (Lond.). 1938; 38: 732
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disc Susceptibility Tests, as used in Clinical Laboratories, Tentative Standards. Los Angeles, California 1972
   Google Scholar
• Newton G. G. F., Hamilton-Miller J. M. T. Cephaloridine: chemical and biochemical aspects. Postgrad, med. J. 1967; 43(suppl.)10
   Google Scholar
• Novick R. P. Staphylococcal penicillinase and the new penicillins. Biochem. J. 1962; 83: 229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersdorf R. G., Sherris J. C. Methods and significance of in vitro testing of bacterial sensitivity to drugs. Amer. J. Med. 1965; 39: 766
   Google Scholar
• Smith D. D. Microbiology Survey. Sydney 1969, Board of Education Report of Surveys. Royal Coll. Path. Aust.
   Google Scholar
• Steers E., Foltz E. L., Graves B. S. An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. Antibiot. et Chemother. (Basel) 1959; 9: 307
   Google Scholar
• Thomas W. J., McReynolds J. W., Mock C. R., Bailey D. W. Ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae meningitis. Lancet 1974; 1: 313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolhurst J. C, Buckle G., Williams S. W. Chemotherapy with Antibiotics and Allied Drugs. N. H. & M. R. C, Canberra 1972; 88, 256, 259, 270
   Google Scholar
• Turck M., Lindemeyer R. I., Petersdorf R. G. Comparison of single-disc and tubedilution techniques in determining antibiotic sensitivities of gram-negative pathogens. Ann. int. Med. 1963; 58: 56
   Google Scholar
• Waisbren B. A. The proof of efficacy of antibiotics. Amer. J. med. Sci. 1965; 250: 406
   Google Scholar
• Waterwoth Pamela M. The disc sensitivity test. J. med. Lab. Technol. 1971; 28: 385
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein L., Dalton A. C. Host determinants of response to antimicrobial agents. New Engl. J. Med. 1968; 279: 467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wick W. E. Disc-susceptibility testing in United States Hospitals. Proc. 6th Int. Congr. Chemo., Tokyo, 1970, 2, 953
   Google Scholar
• Wld. Hlth., Org. Tech. Rep. Ser. No. 210, 1961, Standardization of methods for conducting microbic sensitivity tests
   Google Scholar