Blood-Culture Techniques. A Survey in Australasian Laboratories

References

• Bacteremia. Laboratory and clinical aspects, A. C. Sonnenwirth. CC Thomas, Springfield, Ill 1973
   Google Scholar
• The detection of Septicemia, J. A. Washington, II. CRC Press Inc, West Palm Beach, Fla 1978
   Google Scholar
• Balows A., Sonnenwirth A. C. Bacteremia. Laboratory and clinical aspects. CC Thomas, Springfield, Ill 1983
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman V. P., Pritchard R. C. External quality assurance in microbiology. The programme of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Pathology 1984; 16: 235–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellner P. D. System for inoculation of blood in the laboratory. Appl Microbiol 1968; 16: 1892–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Editorial staff. Survey of blood culture methods. Clin Microbiol Newsletter 1981; 3: 80–4, 87–9
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett R. C. Contemporary blood culture practices, In1
   Google Scholar
• Morello J. A. Blood culture practices currently in use, In3
   Google Scholar
• Updegraff D. M. A cultural method of quantitatively studying the microorganisms in the skin. J Invest Dermatol 1964; 43: 129–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans C. A., Mattern K. L. The bacterial flora of the antecubital fossa: The efficacy of alcohol disinfection of this site, the palm and the forehead. J Invest Dermatol 1980; 75: 140–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaul A. F., Jowett J. F. Agents and techniques for disinfection of the skin. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981; 152: 677–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reller L. B., Murray P. R., MacLowry J. D., Washington J. A., 11. Blood cultures II, I. A. Cumitech. American Society for Microbiology, Washington 1982
   Google Scholar
• Speller D. C., Stephens M. E., Viant A. C. Hospital Infections by Pseudomonas cepacia. Lancet 1971; 1: 798–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Craven D. E., Moody B., Connolly M. G., et al. Pseudobacteremia caused by povidone-iodine solution contaminated with Pseudomonas cepacia. New Engl J Med 1981; 305: 621–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berkelman R. L., Lewin S., Allen J. R., et al. Pseudobacteremia attributed to contamination of povidone-iodine with Pseudomonas cepacia. Ann Int Med 1981; 95: 32–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaslow R. A., Mackel D. C., Mallison G. F. Nosocomial pseudobacteremia: Positive blood cultures due to contaminated benzalkonium antiseptic. JAMA 1976; 236: 2407–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morton H. E. Disinfection, sterilization and preservation. 2nd ed, S. S. Block. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia 1977; 301–18
   Google Scholar
• Berger S. A. Pseudobacteremia due to contaminated alcohol swabs. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18: 974–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson G. S., Miles A. Topley and Wilson's Principles of bacteriology, virology and immunity, 6th ed. Edward Arnold, London 1975
   Google Scholar
• Martindale. The extra pharmacopoeia. 28th ed, J. EF Reynolds. The Pharmaceutical Press, London 1982; 552–554
   Google Scholar
• Washington J. A., II. Conventional approaches to blood culture. 41–87, Ref. 2
   Google Scholar
• Stratton W. Endemic staphylococcal pseudobacteremia. Infect Control 1982; 2: 251–2
   Google Scholar
• Hall M. M., Warren E., Washington J. A., II. Detection of bacteremia with liquid media containing sodium polyanethole sulfonate. Appl Microbiol 1974; 27: 187–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Washington J. A., II. Characteristics of bacteremia relevant to its laboratory diagnosis. 27–30, Ref. 2
   Google Scholar
• Hall M. M., Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., II. Effect of volume of blood cultured on detection of bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol 1976; 3: 643–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenney J. H., Reller L. B., Mirrett S., Wang W-L., Weinstein M. P. Controlled evaluation of the volume of blood cultured in detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 15: 558–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandven P., Hoiby E. A. The importance of blood volume cultured in the detection of bacteremia. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand (B) 1981; 89: 149–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plorde J. J., Tenover F. C., Carlson L. G. Specimen volume versus yield in the BACTEC blood culture system. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 22: 292–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kracke R. R., Teasley H. E. The efficiency of blood cultures with report of a new method based on complement fixation. J Lab Clin Med 1930; 16: 169–82
   Google Scholar
• Roome A. P., Tozer R. A. Effect of dilution on the growth of bacteria from blood cultures. J Clin Pathol 1968; 21: 719–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Auckenthaler R., Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., II. Comparison of recovery of organisms from blood cultures diluted 10% (volume/volume) and 20% (volume/volume). J Clin Microbiol 1982; 15: 860–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaneda M. R. A practical method for routine blood cultures in brucellosis. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1947; 64: 114–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall M. M., Mueske C. A., Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., II. Evaluation of a biphasic medium for blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1979; 10: 673–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowrance B. L., Traub W. H. Inactivation of the bactericidal activity of human serum by Liquoid (sodium polyanethol sulfonate). Appl Microbiol 1969; 17: 839–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kocka F. E., Magoc T. C., Searcy R. L. Action of sulfated polyanions used in the blood culture on lysozyme, complement and antibiotics. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1972; 2: 470–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosner R. A quantitative evaluation of three blood culture systems. Am J Clin Pathol 1972; 57: 220–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finegold S. M., Ziment I., White M. L., Winn W. R., White W. T. Evaluation of polyanethol sulfonate (Liquoid) in blood cultures. Antimicr Agents Chemother 1967; 692–6, 1968
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eng J. Effect of sodium polyanethol sulfonate in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1975; 1: 119–123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Escamilla J., Santiago L. T., Uylangco C. V., Cross J. H. Evaluation of sodium polyanethol sulfonate as a blood culture additive for recovery of Salmonella typhy and Salmonella paratyphi A. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18: 380–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall M. M., Warren E., Ilstrup D., Washington J. A., II. A comparison of sodium amylosulfate and sodium polyanethole sulfonate in blood culture media. J Clin Microbiol 1976; 3: 212–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reimer L. G., Reller L. B. Effect of sodium polyanethole sulfonate and gelatin on the recovery of Gardnerella vaginalis from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 21: 686–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eng J., Holten E. Gelatin neutralization of the inhibitory effect of sodium polyanethol sulfonate on Neisseria meningitidis in blood culture media. J Clin Microbiol 1977; 6: 1–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkins T. D., West S. E. Medium-dependent inhibition of Peptostreptococcus anaerobius by sodium polyanethol sulfonate in blood culture media. J Clin Microbiol 1976; 3: 393–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gradwohl's Clinical laboratory methods and diagnosis, 8th ed, A. C. Sonnenwirth, L. Jarett. CV Mosby, St Louis 1980; 735–1430
   Google Scholar
• Washington J. A., II, Hall M. M., Warren E. Evaluation of blood culture media supplemented with sucrose or with cysteine. J Clin Microbiol 1975; 1: 79–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eng J. Evaluation of sucrose and magnesium sulfate as additives in aerobic blood culture media. J Clin Microbiol 1981; 14: 247–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts G. D., Horstmeier C. D., Ilstrup D. M. Evaluation of a hypertonic sucrose medium for the detection of fungi in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1976; 4: 110–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellner P. D., Kiehn T. D., Beebe J. L., McCarthy L. R. Critical analysis of hypertonic medium and agitation in detection of bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol 1976; 4: 216–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simberkoff M. S., Thomas L., McGregor D., Shenkein L., Levine B. B. Inactivation of penicillins by carbohydrate solutions at alkaline pH. New Engl J Med 1970; 283: 116–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan N. M., Sutter V. L., Carter, et al. Bacteremia after genitourinary tract manipulation: Bacteriological aspects and evaluation of various blood culture systems. Appl Microbiol 1972; 23: 1101–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinstein M. P., Reller L. B., Mirrett S., Wen-Lan L. W. Controlled evaluation of hypertonic sucrose medium for detection of bacteremia and fungemia in supplemented peptone broth. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 16: 490–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfaller M. A., Westfall L. M., Niles A. C., et al. Comparison of tryptic soy broth with tryptic soy broth supplemented with sucrose in the Septi-Chek blood culture system. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 17: 272–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reimer L. G., Reller L. B., Mirrett S., Wang W-L., Cox R. L. Controlled evaluation of hypertonic surcorse medium at a 1:5 ratio of blood to broth for detection of bacteremia and fungemia in supplemented peptone broth. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 17: 1045–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brogan O. Isolation of L-forms by blood culture. J Clin Pathol 1976; 29: 934–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dowling H. R., Hirsh H. L. The use of penicillinase in cultures of body fluids obtained from patients under treatment with penicillin. Am J Med Sci 1945; 210: 756–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carleton J., Hamburger M. Unmasking of false-negative blood cultures in patients receiving new penicillins. JAMA 1963; 186: 157–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Washington J. A., II. Blood cultures — Merits of new media and techniques — significance of findings. Significance of medical microbiology in the care of patients. 2nd ed, Victor Lorian. Williams and Wilkins. 1983
   Google Scholar
• Blazevic D. J., Stemper J. E., Matsen J. M. Effect of aerobic and anaerobic atmospheres on isolation of organisms from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1975; 1: 154–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harkness J. L., Hall M. M., Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., II. Effects of atmosphere of incubation and of routine subculture on detection of bacteremia in vacuum blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol 1975; 2: 296–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin W. J., Wilhelm P. A., Bruckner D. Recovery of anaerobic bacteria from vented blood-culture bottles. Rev Inf Dis 1984; 6: S59–61
   Google Scholar
• Szymczak E. G., Barr J. T., Durbin W. A., Goldmann D. A. Evaluation of bloodculture procedures in a pediatric hospital. J Clin Microbiol 1979; 9: 88–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer G. W., Longfield R., Hemming V. G., Valdes-Dapena A., Smith L. P. Pneumococcal sepsis with false-negative blood cultures. Am J Clin Pathol 1982; 78: 348–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blazevic D. J., Stemper J. E., Matsen J. M. Comparison of macroscopic examination, routine gram stains and routine subcultures in the initial detection of positive blood cultures. Appl Microbiol 1974; 27: 537–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall M. M., Warren E., Washington J. A., II. Comparison of two liquid blood culture media containing sodium polyanethole sulfonate: Tryptic soy and Columbia. Appl Microbiol 1974; 27: 699–702
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins B. L., Peterson E. M., de la Maza L. M. Rapid detection of positive blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18: 716–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mascart G., Bertrand F., Mascart P. Comparative study of subculture, Gram staining and acridine orange staining for early detection of positive blood cultures. J Clin Pathol 1983; 36: 595–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCarthy L. R., Senne J. E. Evaluation of acridine orange stain for detection of micro-organisms in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1980; 11: 281–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirrett S., Lauer B. A., Miller G. A., Reller L. B. Comparison of acridine orange, methylene blue and Gram stains for blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 15: 562–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Disease Control. Contamination of blood-culture medium — Kentucky, Maryland. Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 1974; 23: 109–10
   Google Scholar
• Sliva H. S., Washington J. A., II. Optimal time for routine early subculture of blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1980; 12: 445–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gill V. J. Lack of clinical relevance in routine terminal subculturing of blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1981; 14: 116–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell J., Washington J. A., II. Evaluation of the necessity for routine terminal subcultures of previously negative blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1980; 12: 576–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiehn T. E., Wong B., Edwards F. F., Armstrong D. Routine aerobic terminal subculturing of blood cultures in a cancer hospital. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18: 885–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinstein M. P. Detection of bacteremia (letter). Infect Control 1984; 3: 284–5
   Google Scholar
• Murray P., Sondag J. E. Evaluation of routine subcultures of macroscopically negative blood cultures for detection of anaerobes. J Clin Microbiol 1978; 8: 427–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paisley J. W., Rosenblatt J. E., Hall M., Washington J. A., II. Evaluation of a routine anaerobic subculture of blood cultures for detection of anaerobic bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol 1978; 8: 764–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry N. K., Grewell C. M., McLimans C. A., Washington J. A., II. Comparison of the Roche Septi-Chek blood culture bottle with a brain heart infusion biphasic medium bottle and with a tryptic soy broth bottle. J Clin Microbiol 1984; 19: 315–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinstein M. P., Reller L. B., Mirrett S., et al. Clinical comparison of an agar slide blood culture bottle with tryptic soy broth and a conventional blood culture bottle with supplemented peptone broth. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 21: 815–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfaller M. A., Sibley T. K., Westfall L. M. Clinical laboratory comparison of a slide blood culture system with a conventional broth system. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 16: 525–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anhalt J. P. New or experimental approaches to detection of bacteremia. 109–144, Ref. 2
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenwirth A. C. Detection of anaerobes by radiometry: Recent observations. 55–60, Ref. 3
   Google Scholar
• Plorde J. J., Carlson L. G., Dau M. E. Lack of clinical relevance in routine final subcultures of radiometrically negative BACTEC blood culture vials. Am J Clin Pathol 1982; 78: 753–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strauss R. R., Throm R., Friedman H. Radiometric detection of bacteremia: Requirement for terminal subcultures. J Clin Microbiol 1977; 5: 145–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Araj G. F., Hopfer R. L., Wenglar M., Fainstein V. Value of terminal subcultures from negative BACTEC blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol 1981; 14: 589–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith L. L., McTighe A. H., Patel C. D. Using blood culture data as a management tool. MLO Feb 1983; 1–8
   Google Scholar
• Collee J. G. Considerations of contamination in relation to blood culture. Blood culture — current state and future prospects, J. G. Gould, B. I. Duerden, 1983; 36: 963–977, J Clin Pathol
   Google Scholar
• Abeyesundere R. L., Bradley J. M., Chipping P., Rogers B. T., Noone P. Bacteraemia in the Royal Free Hospital 1972–6. J Infection 1979; 1: 127–38
   Google Scholar
• de Louvois J. Bacteriological examination of pus from abscesses of the central nervous system. J Clin Pathol 1980; 33: 66–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Effersoe P. The importance of the duration of incubation in the investigation of blood cultures. Acta Path Microbiol Scand 1965; 65: 129–33
   Google Scholar