References
- Mjaland O, Adamsen S, Hjelmquist B, Ovaska J, Buanes T. Cholecystectomy rates, gallstone prevalence, and handling of bile duct injuries in Scandinavia. A comparative audit. Surg Endosc 1998;12:1386–9.
- Barkun JS, Barkun AN, Sampalis JS, Fried G, Taylor B, Wexler MJ, et al. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Lancet 1992;340:1116–19.
- McMahon AJ, Russell IT, Baxter JN, Ross S, Anderson JR, Morran CG, et al. Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial. Lancet 1994;343:135–8.
- Bakken IJ, Skjeldestad FE, Mjaland O, Johnson E. [Cholecystectomy in Norway 1990-2002. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2004;124:2376–8.
- Rosenmuller M, Haapamaki MM, Nordin P, Stenlund H, Nilsson E. Cholecystectomy in Sweden 2000-2003: a nationwide study on procedures, patient characteristics, and mortality. BMC Gastroenterol 2007;7:35.
- Harboe KM, Bardram L. The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database. Surg Endosc 2011;25:1630–41.
- Sinha S, Hofman D, Stoker DL, Friend PJ, Poloniecki JD, Thompson MM, et al. Epidemiological study of provision of cholecystectomy in England from 2000 to 2009: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics. Surg Endosc 2013;27:162–75.
- Katsika D, Grjibovski A, Einarsson C, Lammert F, Lichtenstein P, Marschall HU. Genetic and environmental influences on symptomatic gallstone disease: a Swedish study of 43,141 twin pairs. Hepatology 2005;41:1138–43.
- Muhrbeck O, Ahlberg J. Prevalence of gallstone disease in a Swedish population. Scand J Gastroenterol 1995;30:1125–8.
- Friedrich N, Volzke H, Hampe J, Lerch MM, Jorgensen T. Known risk factors do not explain disparities in gallstone prevalence between Denmark and northeast Germany. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:89–95.
- Chen CH, Huang MH, Yang JC, Nien CK, Etheredge GD, Yang CC, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gallstone disease in an adult population of Taiwan: an epidemiological survey. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;21:1737–43.
- Shaffer EA. Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2005;7:132–40.
- Botaitis S, Polychronidis A, Pitiakoudis M, Perente S, Simopoulos C. Does gender affect laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2008;18:157–61.
- Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Ko CY, Hall BL. A current profile and assessment of north american cholecystectomy: results from the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg 2010;211:176–86.
- Kanakala V, Borowski DW, Pellen MG, Dronamraju SS, Woodcock SA, Seymour K, et al. Risk factors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multivariate analysis. Int J Surg 2011;9:318–23.
- Priego P, Ramiro C, Molina JM, Rodriguez VG, Lobo E, Galindo J, et al. Results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a third-level university hospital after 17 years of experience. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2009;101:20–30.
- Tan JT, Suyapto DR, Neo EL, Leong PS. Prospective audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy experience at a secondary referral centre in South Australia. ANZ J Surg 2006;76:335–8.
- Veen EJ, Bik M, Janssen-Heijnen ML, De JM, Roukema AJ. Outcome measurement in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by using a prospective complication registry: results of an audit. Int J Qual Health Care 2008;20:144–51.
- Waage A, Nilsson M. Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg 2006;141:1207–13.
- Wichmann MW, Lang R, Beukes E, Esufali ST, Jauch KW, Huttl TK, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy–comparison of early postoperative results in an Australian rural centre and a German university hospital. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010;395:255–60.
- Thesbjerg SE, Harboe KM, Bardram L, Rosenberg J. Sex differences in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2010;24:3068–72.
- Buanes T, Mjaland O, Waage A, Langeggen H, Holmboe J. A population-based survey of biliary surgery in Norway. Relationship between patient volume and quality of surgical treatment. Surg Endosc 1998;12:852–5.