References
- Öresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Hultén L. The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective study in 100 patients. Int J Colored Dis 1989; 4: 50–56
- Taylor B M, Cranley B, Kelly K A, Phillips S F, Beart R W, Dozoiz R R. A clinico-physiological comparison of ileal pouch-anal and straight ileoanal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1983; 198: 462–468
- O'Connell P R, Pemberton J H, Brown M L, Kelly K A. Determinants of stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Surg 1987; 153: 157–164
- Nicholls R J, Pezim M E. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 470–474
- Öresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Åkervall S, Hultén L. Pouch size: the important functional determinant after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 265–269
- Nicholls R J, Moskowitz R L, Shepherd N A. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 576–79
- Nicholls R J, Lubowski D Z. Restorative proctocolectomy: the four loop (W) reservoir. Br J Surg 1987; 74: 567–568
- Luukkonen P, Järvinen H. Pelvic ileal reservoirs: experimental assessment of reservoir capacity in three reservoir designs. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1987; 76: 294–297
- Kock N G. Intra-abdominal ‘reservoir’ in patients with permanent ileostomy. Arch Surg 1969; 99: 223–231
- Berglund B, Brevinge H, Kock N G, Lindholm E. Expansion of various types of ileal reservoirs in situ. An experimental study in rats. Eur Surg Res 1987; 19: 298–304
- Hultén L, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Öresland T. Kock's pouch converted to a pelvic pouch—a case report. Dis Colon Rectum 1988; 31: 467–469
- Hallgren T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Öresland T, Hallsberg L, Hultén L. Manovolumetric characteristics and functional results in three different pelvic pouch designs. Int J Colored Dis 1989; 4: 156–160
- Åkervall S, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Öresland T, Hultén L. Manovolumetry: a new method for investigation of anorectal function. Gut 1988; 29: 614–623
- Nasmyth D G, Johnston D, Godwin P GR, Dixon M F, Smith A, Williams N S. Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 469–473
- Harms B A, Hamilton J W, Yamamoto D T, Starling J R. Quadruple-loop (W) ileal pouch reconstruction after proctocolectomy: Analysis and functional results. Surgery 1987; 102: 561–567
- Everett W G. Experience of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 77–81
- McHugh S M, Diamant N E, McLeod R, Cohen Z. S-pouches vs. J-pouches. A comparison of functional outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 1985; 30: 671–677
- Berglund B, Kock N G, Myrvold H E. Volume capacity and pressure characteristics of the continent ileostomy reservoir. Scand J Gastroenterol 1984; 19: 683–690
- Lane R HS, Parks A G. Function of the anal sphincters following colo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1977; 64: 596–599
- Scarli A F, Kiesewetter W B. Defecation and continence: some new concepts. Dis Colon Rectum 1970; 13: 81–107
- Keighley M RB, Yoshioka K, Kmiot W. Prospective randomized trial to compare the stapled double lumen pouch and the sutured quadruple pouch for restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1988; 75: 1008–1011
- Becker J M, Raymond J L. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A single surgeon's experience with 100 consecutive cases. World J Surg 1986; 204: 375–383
- O'Connell P R, Rankin D R, Weiland L H, Kelly K A. Enteric bacteriology, absorption, morphology and emptying after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 909–914