DNA Ploidy, Tumour Site, and Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer: A Flow Cytometric Study of Paraffin-Embedded Tissue

References

• Friedlander M L, Hedley D W, Taylor I W. Clinical and biological significance of aneuploidy in human tumours. J Clin Pathol 1984; 37: 961–974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage N C, Robins R A, Evans D F, Turner D R, Baldwin R W, Hardcastle J D. The influence of tumour cell DNA abnormalities on survival in colo-rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 828–830
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kokal W, Sheibani K, Terz J, Harada J R. Tumour DNA content in the prognosis of colorectal carcinoma. JAMA 1986; 255: 3123–3127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauer K D, Lincoln S T, Vera-Roman J M, et al. Prognostic implications of proliferative activity and DNA aneuploidy in colonic adenocarcinomas. Lab Invest 1987; 57: 329–335
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott N A, Rainwater L M, Wieand H S, et al. The relative prognostic value of flow cytometric DNA analysis and conventional clinicopathologic criteria in patients with operable rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1987; 30: 513–520
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott N A, Wieand H S, Moertel C G, Cha S S, Beart R W, Lieber M M. Colorectal cancer. Dukes' stage, tumour site, preoperative plasma CEA level, and patient prognosis related to tumor DNA ploidy pattern. Arch Surg 1987; 122: 1375–1379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirke P, Dixon M F, Clayden A D, et al. Prognostic significance of DNA aneuPloidY and cell Proliferation in rectal adenocarcinomas. J Pathol 1987; 151: 285–291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones D J, Moore M, Schofield P F. Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy in colorectal cancer: a prospective flow cytometric study. Br J Surg 1988; 75: 28–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jass J R, Mukawa K, Croh F I S, Love S B, Capellaro D. Clinical importance of DNA content in rectal cancer measured by flow cytometry. J Clin Pathol 1989; 42: 254–259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spratt J S, Spjut H J. Prevalence and prognosis of individual clinical and pathological variables associated with colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1967; 20: 1976–1985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin J D, Brown C C. Some prognostic factors in survival of patients with cancer of the colon and rectum. J Chron Dis 1975; 28: 441–454
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halvorsen T B, Seim E. Tuniour site: a prognostic (actor in colorcctal cancer? A multivariate analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1987; 22: 124–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaney G. Results of treatment of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Modern trends in surgery, W T Irvine. Butterworths, London 1971; 69–89
   Google Scholar
• Wiggers T, Arends J W, Schutte B, Volovics L, Bosman F T. A multivariate analysis of pathologic prognostic indicators in large bowel cancer. Cancer 1988; 61: 3116–395
   Google Scholar
• Flalvorsen T B, Seim E. Association between invamenrss, inflainmatory reaction, desmoplasia and survival in colorectal cancer. J Clin Parhol 1989; 42: 162–166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ialvorscn T B. Tissue sampling and histological grading in colorectal cancer. Are routine sections representative?. APMIS 1989; 97: 261–266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Medley D W, Friedlander M L, Taylor I W, Rugg C A, Musgrove E A. Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of Yfin-emhedded pathological material using flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem 1983; 31: 1133–1335
   Google Scholar
• Hiddemann W, Schumann J, Andreeff M, et al. Conveotion on nomenclature for DNA cytometry. Cytometry 1984; 5: 445–446
   Google Scholar
• Dixon W J. BMDP statistical software. University of California Press, Berkeley, California 1983
   Google Scholar
• Rognum T O, Thorud E, Lund E. Survival of large bowel catrcinoma patients with differcnl DNA ploidy. Br J Cancer 1987; 56: 633–636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones D J, Moore M, Schofield P F. Refining the prognostic significance of DNA ploidy status in colo-rectal cancer: a prospective flow cytometric study. Int J Cancer 1988; 41: 206–210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kokai W A, Gardine R L, Shcibani K, et al. Tumor DNA content in resectable, primary coiorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 1989; 209: 188–193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tribukait B, Hammarberg C, Rubio C. Ploidy and pmliferation patterns in colorectal adenocarci nomas related to Dukes' classification and to histopathological differentiarion. A flow-cytometric DNA study. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand ‘A’ 1983; 91: 89–95
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki H, Matsunioto K, Masuda T, Koike H. DNA ploidy of colorectal carcinoma. Correlation with conventional prognostic variables. J Clin Gastroenterol 1988; 10: 176–178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melamed M R, Enker W E, Banner P, Janov A, Kessler G, Darzynkiewicz Z. Flow cytometry of colorectal carcinoma with three-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 1986; 29: 184–186
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jass J R, Love S B, Northover J M A. A new prognostic classification of rectal cancer. Lancet 1987; 1: 1303–1306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolley R C, Schreiber K, Koss L G, Karas M, Sherman A. DNA distribution in human colon carcinomas and its relationship to clinical behavior. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982; 69: 15–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goh H S, Jass J R, Atkin W S, Cuzick J, Northover J M A. Value of cytometric determination of ploidy as a guide to prognosis in operable rectal cancer: A multivariate analysis. Int J Colorect Dis 1987; 7: 17–21
   Google Scholar
• Finan P J, Quirke P, Dixon M F, Dyson J E D, Giles G R, Bird C C. Is DNA aneuploidy a good prognostic indicator in patients with advanced colorectal cancer?. Br J Cancer 1986; 54: 327–330
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schutte B, Reynders M M J, Rosman F F, Blijham G H. Flow cytometric determiriation of DNA ploidy level in nuclei isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue. Cytometry 1985; 6: 76–30
   Google Scholar
• Emdin S O, Stenling R, Roos G. Prognostic vaiue of DNA content in cobrectal carcinoma. A flow cytometric study with some methodological aspects. Cancer 1987; 60: 1282–1287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kute T E, Gregory R, Galleshaw J, Hopkins M, Buss D, Case D. How reproducible arc flow cytometry data from paraffin-embedded blocks?. Cytometry 1988; 9: 404–498
   Google Scholar
• Idedley D W, Friedlander M L, Tuyior I W. Application of DNA flow cytometry to paraffin-embedded archival material for the siudy of aneuploidy and its clinical significancc. Qtometry 1985; 6: 327–333
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macartney S C, Campiejohn K S, Powell G. DNA flow cytometry of histological material from human gastric cancer. J Pathol 1986; 148: 273–277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenz G, Møller U. Cional hererogeneity in curetted human epidermal cancers and precancers analysed by Bow cytonietry and compared with histology. Br J Dermatol 1983; 109: 173–181
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grinnell R S. The spread of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1950; 3: 641–652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolmark N, Cruz I, Redmond C K, Fisher B. Fisher E. R and contributing N. S. A. B. P investigators. Tumor size and regional lymph mode metastasis in colorectal cancer. A preliminary analysis from the NSABP clinical trials. Cancer 1983; 51: 1315–1322
   PubMedGoogle Scholar