Comparison of antigen and two molecular methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins

References

• Bartlett JG. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. N Engl J Med 2002;346:334–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson S, Gerding DN. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:1027–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijper EJ, Coignard B, Tull P. Emergence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in North America and Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006;12:2–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan SS, McDermott BP, Parchuri S, Cunha BA. Lack of value of repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile toxin. Am J Med 2006;119:356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen SH, Yajarayma JT, Silva J. Analysis of the pathogenicity locus in Clostridium difficile strains. J Infect Dis 2000; 181:659–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Hundsberger T, Leukel P, Sauerborn M, von Eichel-Streiber C. Definition of the single integration site of the pathogenicity locus in Clostridium difficile. Gene 1996;181:29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond GA, Johnson JL. The toxinogenic element of Clostridium difficile strain VPI 10463. Microb Pathog 1995;19:203–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupnik M, Kato N, Grabnar M, Kato H. New types of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive strains among Clostridium difficile isolates from Asia. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:1118–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacci S, Mølbak K, Kjeldsen MK, Olsen K. Binary toxin and death after Clostridium difficile infection. Emerg Infect Dis 2011;17:976–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goorhuis A, Debast SB, van Leengoed LA. Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078: an emerging strain in humans and in pigs?J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:1157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbut F, Kajzer C, Planas N, Petit JC. Comparison of three enzyme immunoassays, a cytotoxicity assay, and toxigenic culture for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:963–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan PH. Is a two-step glutamate dehyrogenase antigen-cytotoxicity neutralization assay algorithm superior to the premier toxin A and B enzyme immunoassay for laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile?J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46:1523–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musher DM., Manhas A, Jain P, Nuila F, Waqar A, Logan N, . Detection of Clostridium difficile toxin: comparison of enzyme immunoassay results with results obtained by cytotoxicity assay. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:2737–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan LM, Duresko BJ, Gustafson DR, Rosenblatt JE. Comparison of real-time PCR for detection of the tcdC gene with four toxin immunoassays and culture in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46:1996–2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmee M, Van Broeck J, Simon A, Janssens M, Avesani V. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: a plea for culture. J Med Microbiol 2005;54:187–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson LR, Manson R, Paule US, Hacek DM, Robicsek A, Thomson RB, Kaul KL. Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in stool samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45:1152–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Berg RJ, Vaessen N, Endtz HP, Schulin T, van der Vorm ER, Kuijper EJ. Evaluation of real-time PCR and conventional diagnostic methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in a prospective multicentre study. J Med Microbiol 2007;56:36–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvach EJ, Ferguson D, Riska PF, Landry ML. Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection. J Clin Microbiol 2010;8:109–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lalande V, Barrault L, Wadel S, Eckert C, Petit JC, Barbut F. Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:2714–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak-Weekley SM, Marlowe EM, Miller JM, Cumpio J, Nomura JH, Vance PH, Weissfeld A. Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:889–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antikainen J, Pasanen T, Mero S, Tarkka E, Kirveskari J, Kotila S, . Detection of virulence genes of Clostridium difficile by multiplex PCR. APMIS 2009;117:607–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiken Genome Site. The principle of LAMP method. Eiken Chemical Co. Ltd; 2005. Available at: http://loopamp.eiken.co.jp/e/lamp/index.html (accessed 23th July 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Bouza ET, Peláez R, Alonso P, Catalán P, Muñoz, Créixems MR.“Second-look” cytotoxicity: an evaluation of culture plus cytotoxin assay of Clostridium difficile isolates in the laboratory diagnosis of CDAD. J Hosp Infect 2001;48: 233–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly CP, Pothoulakis C, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile colitis. N Engl J Med 1994;330:257–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson LR, Kelly PJ, Nordbrock HA. Role of culture and toxin detection in laboratory testing for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1996;15:330–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reller E, Lema CA, Perl TM, Cai M, Ross TL, Speck KA, Carroll KC. Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:3601–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwood K, Else P, Charlett A, Wilcox M. Comparison of nine commercially available C. difficile toxin detection assays, a real time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB and a GDH detection assay, with cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture. J Clin Microbiol 2009;10:3211–7.
   Google Scholar
• Yolken RH, Whitcomb LS, Marien G, Bartlett JD, Libby J, Ehrich M, Wilkins. Enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Clostridium difficile antigen. J Infect Dis 1981;144:378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscidi R, Laughon BE, Hanvanich M, Bartlett JD. Improved enzyme immunoassays for the detection of antigens in fecal specimens. Investigation and correction of interfering factors.J Immunol Methods 1984;67:129–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S, Do J, Mahalanabis M, Fan A, Jepeal L, Singh S, Klapperich C. A disposable DNA amplification platform for the detection of Clostridium difficile infected stool specimens. Presented at the 15th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences, 2011. Seattle, WA, October 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Barbut F, Monot M, Rousseau A, Cavelot S, Simon T, Burghoffer B, . Rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by multiplex real-time PCR. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2011;30:1279–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norén T, Alriksson I, Andersson J, Åkerlund T, Unemo M. Rapid and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for Clostridium difficile detection challenges cytotoxin B cell test and culture as gold standard. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:710–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knetsch CW, Bakker D, de Boer RF, Sanders I, Hofs S, Kooistra-Smid AM, . Comparison of real-time PCR techniques to cytotoxigenic culture methods for diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49: 227–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zidari V, Kevorkijan BK, Oresic N, Janezi S, Rupnik M. Comparison of two commercial molecular tests for the detection of Clostridium difficile in the routine diagnostic laboratory. J Med Microbiol 2011;60:1131–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crobach MJ, Dekkers OH, Wilcox MH, Kuijper EJ. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID): data review and recommendations for diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Clin Microbiol Infect 2009;15:1053–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar