Paying Substance Abusers in Research Studies: Where Does the Money Go?

REFERENCES

• Lovato LC, Hill K, Hertert S, Hunningshake B, Probstfield JL. Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: Literature summary and annotated bibliography. Control Clin Trials 1997; 18(4):328–252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, DiGuiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R, Felix LM, Pratap S. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (3). DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4.
   Google Scholar
• Mapstone J, Elbourne D, Roberts I. Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (2). DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub3.
   Google Scholar
• Watson JM, Torgerson DJ. Increasing recruitment to randomized trials: A review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med Res Method 2006; 6:34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirby KC, Benishek LA, Dugosh KL, Kerwin ME. Substance abuse treatment providers beliefs and objections regarding contingency management: Implications for dissemination. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006; 85(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koocher GP. Questionable methods in alcoholism research. J Consult Clin Psych 1991; 59:249–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter AJ, Fry CL, Swan A. The ethics of reimbursing injecting drug users for public health research interviews: What price are we prepared to pay? Int J Drug Policy 2003; 14(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber JE, Sorenson JL. Ethical issues in community based research and intervention. In Methodological Issues in Applied Social Psychology, (vol. 2), Social Psychological Applications to Social Issues. Edwards J, Tinsdale RS, Heath L, Prosavac EJ, eds. New York: Plenum Press, 1992; 43–64.
   Google Scholar
• Ashery RS, McAuliffe WE. Implementation issues and techniques in randomized trials of outpatient psychosocial treatments for drug abusers: Recruitment of subjects. Am J Drug Alcohol Ab 1992; 18(3):305–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott CK. A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004; 74(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):21–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansten ML, Downey L, Rosengren DB, Donovan DM. Relationship between follow up rates and treatment outcomes in substance abuse research: More is better but when is “enough” enough? Addiction 2000; 95(9):1403–1416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen AS, Patrick DC, Shern DL. Minimizing attrition in longitudinal studies of special populations: An integrated management approach. Eval Program Plann 1996; 19:309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josephson E, Rosen MA. Panel loss in a high school drug study. In Longitudinal Research on Drug Use: Empirical Findings and Methodological Issues. Kandel DB, ed. New York: John Wiley, 1978; 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen WB, Tobler NS, Graham JW. Attrition in substance abuse prevention research: A meta-analysis of 85 longitudinally followed cohorts. Evaluation Rev 1990; 14:677–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bale RN. The validity and reliability of self-reported data from heroin addicts: Mailed questionnaires compared with face-to-face interviews. Int J Addict 1979; 14(7):993–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould LC, Lukoff I. Selecting a study design. In Conducting Follow-Up Research on Drug Treatment Programs. Johnston LD, Nurco DN, Robins LN, eds. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1977, (DHEW Publication No. ADM 77-487) 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Polich JM, Armor DJ, Braiker HB. The Course of Alcoholism: Four Years after Treatment. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell D, Stanley J. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger DS, Marlowe DB, Croft JR, Dugosh KL, Mastro NK, Lee PA, DeMatteo DS, Patapis NS. Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation? Drug Alcohol Depend 2005; 78(3):275–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry C, Dwyer R. For love or money? An exploratory study of why injecting drug users participate in research. Addiction 2001; 96:1319–1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenheck R. Disability payments and chemical dependence: Conflicting values and uncertain effects. Psychiatr Serv 1997; 48:789–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaner A, Eckman TA, Roberts LJ, Wilkins JN, Tucker DE, Tsuang JW, Mintz J. Disability income, cocaine use, and repeated hospitalization among schizophrenic cocaine abusers: A government-sponsored revolving door. New Engl J Med 1995; 333:777–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickert N, Grady C. What’s the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. New Engl J Med 1999; 341:198–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macklin R. “Due” and “undue” inducements: On paying money to research subjects. IRB 1981; 3:1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGee G. Subject to payment? J Am Med Assoc 1997; 278:199–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottler LB, Compton WM, Keating S. What incentives are effective rewards for hidden populations interviewed as part of research projects? Public Health Rep 1995; 110:178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb RJ, Iguchi MY, Kirby KC Effects of target criteria and reinforcement magnitude in reinforcing reduced breathe CO levels in smokers not receiving treatment. In Problems of Drug Dependence 1994: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Scientific Meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence.
   Google Scholar
• Stitzer ML, McCaul ME, Bigelow GE, Liebson IA. Oral methadone self-administration: Effects of dose and alternative re-enforcers. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1983; 34(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):29–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger DS, Marlowe DB, Dugosh KL, Croft JR, Arabia PL. Higher magnitude cash payments improve research follow-up rates without increasing drug use or perceived coercion. Drug Alcohol Depen 2008; 96:128–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe DB, Festinger DS, Lee PA, Dugosh KL, Benasutti KM. Matching judicial supervision to clients’ risk status in drug court. Crime Delinquency 2006; 52:52–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe DB, Festinger DS, Dugosh KL, Arabia PL, Kirby KC. An effectiveness trial of contingency management in a felony pre-adjudication drug court. J Appl Behav Anal 2008; 41:565–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey JP, Back SE, Waldrop AE, Jenkins L, Brady KT. The influence of monetary compensation on relapse among addicted participants: Empirical vs. anecdotal evidence. Am J Addict 2008; 17(6):488–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandrey R, Bigelow GE, Stitzer ML. Contingency management in cocaine abusers: A dose-effect comparison of goods-based versus cash-based incentives. Exp Clin Psychopharm 2007; 15(4):338–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil SH, Johnson MW, Higgins ST, Bickel WK. Delay discounting in currently using and currently abstinent cocaine-dependent outpatients and non-drug using matched controls. Addict Behav 2006; 31:1290–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby KN, Petry NM. Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls. Addiction 2004; 99:461–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby KN, Petry NM, Bickel WK. Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. J Exp Psychol: Gen 1999; 128:78–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar