234
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Monetary-Based Consequences for Drug Abstinence: Methods of Implementation and Some Considerations about the Allocation of Finances in Substance Abusers

, Ph.D. & , Ph.D.
Pages 20-29 | Published online: 13 Dec 2011

REFERENCES

  • US Office of National Drug Control Policy. The Economic Costs of Drug Abuse in the United States, 1992–2002 (No. 207303). Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, 2004.
  • Heyman GM. Addiction: A Disorder of Choice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.
  • Herrnstein RJ, Prelec D. A theory of addiction. In Choice Over Time. Elster J, ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 1992; 331–360.
  • Vuchinich RE, Heather N. Choice, Behavioural Economics and Addiction. Amsterdam: Pergamon/Elsevier Science, 2003.
  • Bigelow GE, Brooner RK, Silverman K. Competing motivations: Drug reinforcement vs non-drug reinforcement. J Psychopharmacol 1998; 12:8–14.
  • Johanson CE, Schuster CR. Animal models of drug self-administration. Adv Subst Abuse 1981; 2:219–297.
  • Thompson T. Relations among functional systems in behavior analysis. J Exp Anal Behav 2007; 87:423–440.
  • Stitzer ML, Iguchi MY, Felch LJ. Contingent take-home incentive: Effects on drug use of methadone maintenance patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992; 60:927–934.
  • Higgins ST, Silverman K. Motivating Behavior Change among Illicit Drug Abusers: Research on Contingency Management Interventions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1999.
  • Higgins ST, Heil SH, Solomon LJ, Bernstein IM, Lussier JP, Abel RL, Lynch ME, Badger GJ. A pilot study on voucher-based incentives to promote abstinence from cigarette smoking during pregnancy and postpartum. Nicotine Tob Res 2004; 6:1015–1020.
  • Jones HE, Haug N, Silverman K, Stitzer M, Svikis D. The effectiveness of incentives in enhancing treatment attendance and drug abstinence in methadone-maintained pregnant women. Drug Alcohol Depend 2001; 61:297–306.
  • Dunn KE, Sigmon SC, Reimann EF, Badger GJ, Heil SH, Higgins ST. A contingency-management intervention to promote initial smoking cessation among opioid-maintained patients. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2010; 18:37–50.
  • Higgins ST, Silverman K, Heil SH. Contingency Management in Substance Abuse Treatment. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2008.
  • Higgins ST, Budney AJ, Bickel WK, Foerg FE, Donham R, Badger GJ. Incentives improve outcome in outpatient behavioral treatment of cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51:568–576.
  • Silverman K, Higgins ST, Brooner RK, Montoya ID, Cone EJ, Schuster CR, Preston KL. Sustained cocaine abstinence in methadone maintenance patients through voucher-based reinforcement therapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996; 53:409–415.
  • Silverman K, Wong CJ, Higgins ST, Brooner RK, Montoya ID, Contoreggi C, Umbricht-Schneiter A, Schuster CR, Preston KL. Increasing opiate abstinence through voucher-based reinforcement therapy. Drug Alcohol Depend 1996; 41:157–165.
  • Downey KK, Helmus TC, Schuster CR. Treatment of heroin-dependent poly-drug abusers with contingency management and buprenorphine maintenance. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2000; 8:176–184.
  • Piotrowski NA, Hall SM. Treatment of multiple drug abuse in the methadone clinic. In Motivating Behavior Change among Illicit-Drug Abusers: Research on Contingency Management Interventions. Silverman K, ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1999; 183–202.
  • Dallery J, Silverman K, Chutuape MA, Bigelow GE, Stitzer ML. Voucher-based reinforcement of opiate plus cocaine abstinence in treatment-resistant methadone patients: Effects of reinforcer magnitude. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2001; 9:317–325.
  • Dallery J, Meredith S, Glenn IM. A deposit contract method to deliver abstinence reinforcement for cigarette smoking. J Appl Behav Anal 2008; 41:609–615.
  • Reynolds B, Dallery J, Shroff P, Patak M, Leraas K. A web-based contingency management program with adolescent smokers. J Appl Behav Anal 2008; 41:597–601.
  • Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney J, Greenwell L, Roll J. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Addiction 2006; 101:1546–1560.
  • Carroll KM, Rounsaville BJ. A perfect platform: Combining contingency management with medications for drug abuse. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2007; 33:343–365.
  • Carroll KM, Ball SA, Nich C, O’Connor PG, Eagan DA, Frankforter TL, Triffleman EG, Shi J, Rounsaville BJ. Targeting behavioral therapies to enhance naltrexone treatment of opioid dependence: Efficacy of contingency management and significant other involvement. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001; 58:755–761.
  • Rigsby MO, Rosen MI, Beauvais JE, Cramer JA, Rainey PM, O‘Malley SS, Dieckhaus KD, Rounsaville BJ. Cue-dose training with monetary reinforcement: Pilot study of an antiretroviral adherence intervention. J Gen Intern Med 2000; 15:841–847.
  • Sorensen JL, Haug NA, Delucchi KL, Gruber V, Kletter E, Batki SL, Tulsky JP, Barnett P, Hall S. Voucher reinforcement improves medication adherence in HIV-positive methadone patients: A randomized trial. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 88:54–63.
  • Rosen MI, Dieckhaus K, McMahon TJ, Valdes B, Petry NM, Cramer J, Rounsaville B. Improved adherence with contingency management. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2007; 21:30–40.
  • Lussier JP, Heil SH, Mongeon JA, Badger GJ, Higgins ST. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction 2006; 101:192–203.
  • Petry NM, Martin B, Cooney JL, Kranzler HR. Give them prizes, and they will come: Contingency management for treatment of alcohol dependence. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 68:250–257.
  • Stitzer ML, Petry NM, Peirce J. Motivational incentives research in the national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network. J Subst Abuse Treat 2010; 38(Suppl. 1):S61–S69.
  • Petry NM, Peirce JM, Stitzer ML, Blaine J, Roll JM, Cohen A, Obert J, Killeen T, Saladin ME, Cowell M, Kirby KC, Sterling R, Royer-Malvestuto C, Hamilton J, Booth RE, Macdonald M, Liebert M, Rader L, Burns R, DiMaria J, Copersino M, Stabile PQ, Kolodner K, Li R. Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: A national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62:1148–1156.
  • Petry NM, Tedford J, Austin M, Nich C, Carroll KM, Rounsaville BJ. Prize reinforcement contingency management for treating cocaine users: How low can we go, and with whom? Addiction 2004; 99:349–360.
  • Peirce JM, Petry NM, Stitzer ML, Blaine J, Kellogg S, Satterfield F, Schwartz M, Krasnansky J, Pencer E, Silva-Vazquez L, Kirby KC, Royer-Malvestuto C, Roll JM, Cohen A, Copersino ML, Kolodner K, Li R. Effects of lower-cost incentives on stimulant abstinence in methadone maintenance treatment: A national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63:201–208.
  • Petry NM, Alessi SM. Prize-based contingency management is efficacious in cocaine-abusing patients with and without recent gambling participation. J Subst Abuse Treat 2010; 39:282–288.
  • Petry NM, Oncken C. Cigarette smoking is associated with increased severity of gambling problems in treatment-seeking gamblers. Addiction 2002; 97:745–753.
  • Petry NM, Alessi SM, Marx J, Austin M, Tardif M. Vouchers versus prizes: Contingency management treatment of substance abusers in community settings. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005; 73:1005–1014.
  • Petry NM, Alessi SM, Hanson T, Sierra S. Randomized trial of contingent prizes versus vouchers in cocaine-using methadone patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 2007; 75:983–991.
  • Olmstead TA, Petry NM. The cost-effectiveness of prize-based and voucher-based contingency management in a population of cocaine- or opioid-dependent outpatients. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 102:108–115.
  • Kim A, Kamyab K, Zhu J, Volpp K. Why are financial incentives not effective at influencing some smokers to quit? Results of a process evaluation of a worksite trial assessing the efficacy of financial incentives for smoking cessation. J Occup Environ Med 2011; 53:62–67.
  • Lott DC, Jencius S. Effectiveness of very low-cost contingency management in a community adolescent treatment program. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 102:162–165.
  • DeFulio A, Donlin WD, Wong CJ, Silverman K. Employment-based abstinence reinforcement as a maintenance intervention for the treatment of cocaine dependence: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction 2009; 104:1530–1538.
  • Donlin WD, Knealing TW, Needham M, Wong CJ, Silverman K. Attendance rates in a workplace predict subsequent outcome of employment-based reinforcement of cocaine abstinence in methadone patients. J Appl Behav Anal 2008; 41:499–516.
  • Knealing TW, Roebuck MC, Wong CJ, Silverman K. Economic cost of the therapeutic workplace intervention added to methadone maintenance. J Subst Abuse Treat 2008; 34:326–332.
  • Silverman K, Svikis D, Robles E, Stitzer ML, Bigelow GE. A reinforcement-based therapeutic workplace for the treatment of drug abuse: Six-month abstinence outcomes. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2001; 9:14–23.
  • Silverman K, Robles E, Mudric T, Bigelow GE, Stitzer ML. A randomized trial of long-term reinforcement of cocaine abstinence in methadone-maintained patients who inject drugs. J Consult Clin Psychol 2004; 72:839–854.
  • Silverman K, Svikis D, Wong CJ, Hampton J, Stitzer ML, Bigelow GE. A reinforcement-based therapeutic workplace for the treatment of drug abuse: Three-year abstinence outcomes. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2002; 10:228–240.
  • Jansson LM, Svikis D, Lee J, Paluzzi P, Rutigliano P, Hackerman F. Pregnancy and addiction. A comprehensive care model. J Subst Abuse Treat 1996; 13:321–329.
  • Silverman K, Wong CJ, Needham M, Diemer KN, Knealing T, Crone-Todd D, Fingerhood M, Nuzzo P, Kolodner K. A randomized trial of employment-based reinforcement of cocaine abstinence in injection drug users. J Appl Behav Anal 2007; 40:387–410.
  • Silverman K, Wong CJ, Umbricht-Schneiter A, Montoya ID, Schuster CR, Preston KL. Broad beneficial effects of cocaine abstinence reinforcement among methadone patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998; 66:811–824.
  • Festinger DS, Marlowe DB, Croft JR, Dugosh KL, Mastro NK, Lee PA, Dematteo DS, Patapis NS. Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation? Drug Alcohol Depend 2005; 78:275–281.
  • Vandrey R, Bigelow GE, Stitzer ML. Contingency management in cocaine abusers: A dose-effect comparison of goods-based versus cash-based incentives. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2007; 15:338–343.
  • Roll JM, Reilly MP, Johanson C. The influence of exchange delays on cigarette versus money choice: A laboratory analog of voucher-based reinforcement therapy. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2000; 8:366–370.
  • Bickel WK, Marsch LA. Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: Delay discounting processes. Addiction 2001; 96:73–86.
  • Petry NM, Bickel WK, Arnett M. Shortened time horizons and insensitivity to future consequences in heroin addicts. Addiction 1998; 93:729–738.
  • Reilly MP, Roll JM, Downey KK. Impulsivity and voucher versus money preference in polydrug-dependent participants enrolled in a contingency-management-based substance abuse treatment program. J Subst Abuse Treat 2000; 19:253–257.
  • Rosado J, Sigmon SC, Jones HE, Stitzer ML. Cash value of voucher reinforcers in pregnant drug-dependent women. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2005; 13:41–47.
  • Malotte CK, Hollingshead JR, Rhodes F. Monetary versus nonmonetary incentives for TB skin test reading among drug users. Am J Prev Med 1999; 16:182–188.
  • Paxton R. Prolonging the effects of deposit contracts with smokers. Behav Res Ther 1983; 21:425–433.
  • Paxton R. Deposit contracts with smokers: Varying frequency and amount of repayments. Behav Res Ther 1981; 19:117–123.
  • Paxton R. The effects of a deposit contract as a component in a behavioural programme for stopping smoking. Behav Res Ther 1980; 18:45–50.
  • Winett RA. Parameters of deposit contracts in the modification of smoking. Psychol Rec 1973; 23:49–60.
  • Herrnstein RJ. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav 1970; 13:243–266.
  • Murphy JG, Correia CJ, Colby SM, Vuchinich RE. Using behavioral theories of choice to predict drinking outcomes following a brief intervention. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2005; 13:93–101.
  • Murphy JG, Correia CJ, Barnett NP. Behavioral economic approaches to reduce college student drinking. Addict Behav 2007; 32:2573–2585.
  • Correia CJ, Benson TA, Carey KB. Decreased substance use following increases in alternative behaviors: A preliminary investigation. Addict Behav 2005; 30:19–27.
  • Rash CJ, Olmstead TA, Petry NM. Income does not affect response to contingency management treatments among community substance abuse treatment-seekers. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 104:249–253.
  • Kinnaman JES, Slade E, Bennett ME, Bellack AS. Examination of contingency payments to dually-diagnosed patients in a multi-faceted behavioral treatment. Addict Behav 2007; 32:1480–1485.
  • McKay JR, Foltz C, Stephens RC, Leahy PJ, Crowley EM, Kissin W. Predictors of alcohol and crack cocaine use outcomes over a 3-year follow-up in treatment seekers. J Subst Abuse Treat 2005; 28:S73–S82.
  • Roll JM, Shoptaw S. Contingency management: Schedule effects. Psychiatry Res 2006; 144:91–93.
  • Roll JM, Huber A, Sodano R, Chudzynski JE, Moynier E, Shoptaw S. A comparison of five reinforcement schedules for use in contingency management-based treatment of methamphetamine abuse. Psychol Rec 2006; 56:67–81.
  • Roll JM, Higgins ST. A within-subject comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement of drug abstinence using cigarette smoking as an exemplar. Drug Alcohol Depend 2000; 58:103–109.
  • Petry NM. A comprehensive guide to the application of contingency management procedures in clinical settings. Drug Alcohol Depend 2000; 58:9–25.
  • Correia CJ, Sigmon SC, Silverman K, Bigelow G, Stitzer ML. A comparison of voucher-delivery schedules for the initiation of cocaine abstinence. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2005; 13:253–258.
  • Kirby KC, Marlowe DB, Festinger DS, Lamb RJ, Platt JJ. Schedule of voucher delivery influences initiation of cocaine abstinence. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998; 66:761–767.
  • Romanowich P, Lamb RJ. Effects of escalating and descending schedules of incentives on cigarette smoking in smokers without plans to quit. J Appl Behav Anal 2010; 43:357–367.
  • Lamb RJ, Kirby KC, Morral AR, Galbicka G, Iguchi MY. Shaping smoking cessation in hard-to-treat smokers. J Consult Clin Psychol 2010; 78:62–71.
  • Lamb RJ, Morral AR, Kirby KC, Javors MA, Galbicka G, Iguchi M. Contingencies for change in complacent smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2007; 15:245–255.
  • Lamb RJ, Kirby KC, Morral AR, Galbicka G, Iguchi MY. Improving contingency management programs for addiction. Addict Behav 2004; 29:507–523.
  • Silverman K, Chutuape MA, Bigelow GE, Stitzer ML. Voucher-based reinforcement of cocaine abstinence in treatment-resistant methadone patients: Effects of reinforcement magnitude. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 1999; 146:128–138.
  • Garcia-Rodriguez O, Secades-Villa R, Higgins ST, Fernandez-Hermida J, Carballo JL, Errasti Perez JM, Diaz SA. Effects of voucher-based intervention on abstinence and retention in an outpatient treatment for cocaine addiction: A randomized controlled trial. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2009; 17:131–138.
  • Stitzer ML, Bigelow GE. Contingent payment for carbon monoxide reduction: Effects of pay amount. Behav Ther 1983; 14:647–656.
  • Kidorf M, Stitzer ML, Brooner RK. Characteristics of methadone patients responding to take-home incentives. Behav Ther 1994; 25:109–121.
  • Silverman K, Chutuape MA, Bigelow GE, Stitzer ML. Voucher-based reinforcement of attendance by unemployed methadone patients in a job skills training program. Drug Alcohol Depend 1996; 41:197–207.
  • Critchfield TS, Kollins SH. Temporal discounting: Basic research and the analysis of socially important behavior. J Appl Behav Anal 2001; 34:101–122.
  • Perry JL, Carroll ME. The role of impulsive behavior in drug abuse. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 2008; 200:1–26.
  • Bickel WK, Odum AL, Madden GJ. Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: Delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 1999; 146:447–454.
  • Madden GJ, Bickel WK. Impulsivity: The Behavioral and Neurological Science of Discounting. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2010.
  • Dallery J, Locey ML. Effects of acute and chronic nicotine on impulsive choice in rats. Behav Pharmacol 2005; 16:15–23.
  • Richards JB, Sabol KE, de Wit H. Effects of methamphetamine on the adjusting amount procedure, a model of impulsive behavior in rats. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 1999; 146:432–439.
  • Locey ML, Dallery J. Isolating behavioral mechanisms of intertemporal choice: Nicotine effects on delay discounting and amount sensitivity. J Exp Anal Behav 2009; 91:213–223.
  • Carroll ME, Ankera JJ, Perry JL. Modeling risk factors for nicotine and other drug abuse in the preclinical laboratory. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 104:S70–S78.
  • Carroll ME, Anker JJ, Mach JL, Newman JL, Perry JL. Delay discounting as a predictor of drug abuse. In Impulsivity: The Behavioral and Neurological Science of Discounting. Bickel WK, ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2010; 243–271.
  • Krishnan-Sarin S, Reynolds B, Duhig AM, Smith A, Liss T, McFetridge A, Cavallo DA, Carroll KM, Potenza MN. Behavioral impulsivity predicts treatment outcome in a smoking cessation program for adolescent smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 88:79–82.
  • Yoon JH, Higgins ST, Heil SH, Sugarbaker RJ, Thomas CS, Badger GJ. Delay discounting predicts postpartum relapse to cigarette smoking among pregnant women. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2007; 15:176–186.
  • Dallery J, Raiff BR. Delay discounting predicts cigarette smoking in a laboratory model of abstinence reinforcement. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 2007; 190:485–496.
  • Tucker JA, Roth DL, Vignolo MJ, Westfall AO. A behavioral economic reward index predicts drinking resolutions: Moderation revisited and compared with other outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol 2009; 77:219–228.
  • Tucker JA, Foushee HR, Black BC. Behavioral economic analysis of natural resolution of drinking problems using IVR self-monitoring. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2008; 16:332–340.
  • Tucker JA, Vuchinich RE, Black BC, Rippens PD. Significance of a behavioral economic index of reward value in predicting drinking problem resolution. J Consult Clin Psychol 2006; 74:317–326.
  • Cavallo DA, Nich C, Schepis TS, Smith AE, Liss TB, McFetridge AK, Krishnan-Sarin S. Preliminary examination of adolescent spending in a contingency management based smoking cessation program. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse 2010; 19:335–342.
  • Roll JM, Prendergast ML, Sorensen K, Prakash S, Chudzynski JE. A comparison of voucher exchanges between criminal justice involved and noninvolved participants enrolled in voucher-based contingency management drug abuse treatment programs. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2005; 31:393–401.
  • Pantalon MV, Ferro G, Chawarski MC, LaPaglia DM, Pakes JP, Schottenfeld RS. Voucher purchases in contingency management interventions for women with cocaine dependence. Addict Disord Their Treat 2004; 3:27–35.
  • Bickel WK, Jones BA, Landes RD, Christensen DR, Jackson L, Mancino M. Hypothetical intertemporal choice and real economic behavior: Delay discounting predicts voucher redemptions during contingency-management procedures. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2010; 18:546–552.
  • Schweitzer JB, Sulzer-Azaroff B. Self-control: Teaching tolerance for delay in impulsive children. J Exp Anal Behav 1988; 50:173–186.
  • Rosen MI, Carroll KM, Stefanovics E, Rosenheck RA. A randomized controlled trial of a money management-based substance use intervention. Psychiatr Serv 2009; 60:498–504.
  • Black AC, Rosen MI. A money management-based substance use treatment increases valuation of future rewards. Addict Behav 2011; 36:125–128.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.