Some Observations from Behavioral Economics for Consideration in Promoting Money Management among Those with Substance Use Disorders

REFERENCES

• Loewenstein G. Exotic Preferences: Behavioral Economics and Human Motivation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler R, Sunstein CR. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New York, NY: Penguin Books, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bickel WK, Miller ML, Yi R, Kowal BP, Lindquist DM, Pitcock JA. Behavioral and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: Competing neural systems and temporal discounting processes. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 90:S85–S91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Brennan T, Volpp KG. Asymmetric paternalism to improve health behaviors. J Am Med Assoc 2007; 298(20):2415–2417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsky G, Gilovich T. Why Smart People Make Big Money Mistakes – And How to Correct Them: Lessons from the New Science of Behavioral Economics. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST. Behavioral economics: A novel experimental approach to the study of drug dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend 1993; 33(2):173–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST. The behavioral economics of concurrent drug reinforcers: A review and reanalysis of drug self-administration research. Psychopharmacology 1995; 118(3):250–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST, Hughes JR. Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. I. Functional equivalence of response requirement and drug dose. Life Sci 1990; 47(17):1501–1510.
   Google Scholar
• Bickel WK, Marsch LA. Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: Delay discounting processes. Addiction 2001; 96(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):73–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel WK, Vuchinich RE, eds. Reframing Health Behavior Change with Behavioral Economics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hursh SR. Behavioral economics of drug self-administration and drug abuse policy. J Exp Anal Behav 1991; 56(2):377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuchinich RE, Heather N, eds. Choice, Behavioural Economics, and Addiction. Oxford: Elsevier, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins ST, Silverman K, Heil SH, eds. Contingency Management in Substance Abuse Treatment. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen MI, Bailey M, Rosenheck RR. Alcohol and drug abuse: Principles of money management as a therapy for addiction. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54(2):171–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen MI, Carroll KM, Stefanovics E, Rosenheck RA. A randomized controlled trial of a money management-based substance use intervention. Psychiatr Serv 2009; 60(4):498–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen MI, Rounsaville BJ, Ablondi K, Black AC, Rosenheck RA. Advisor-teller money manager (ATM) therapy for substance use disorders. Psychiatr Serv 2010; 61(7):707–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J Econ Lit 2002; 40(2):351–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachlin H, Raineri A, Cross D. Subjective probability and delay. J Exp Anal Behav 1991; 55(2):233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raineri A, Rachlin H. The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities. J Behav Decis Making 1993; 6(2):77–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue T, Rabin M. Doing it now or later. Am Econ Rev 1999; 89(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):103–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green L, Myerson J. Exponential versus hyperbolic discounting of delayed outcomes: Risk and waiting time. Am Zool 1996; 36(4):496–505.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur JE. An adjustment procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In Quantitative Analysis of Behaviour: The Effect of Delay and Intervening Events on Reinforcement Value. Commons ML, . eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1987; 55–73.
   Google Scholar
• Bickel W, Johnson M. Junk time: Pathological behavior as the interaction of evolutionary and cultural forces. In Choice, Behavioural Economics and Addiction. Vuchinich RE, Heather N, eds. Oxford: Elsevier, 2003; 249–271.
   Google Scholar
• Ainslie G, Haslam N. Hyperbolic discounting. In Choice Over Time. Loewenstein G, Elster J, eds. 1992; 57–92.
   Google Scholar
• Green L, Myerson J, Holt DD, Slevin JR, Estle SJ. Discounting of delayed food rewards in pigeons and rats: Is there a magnitude effect? J Exp Anal Behav 2004; 81(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainslie G. Impulse control in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 1974; 21(3):485–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green L, Myerson J, Ostaszewski P. Discounting of delayed rewards across the life span: Age differences in individual discounting functions. Behav Process 1999; 46(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):89–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg L, Graham S, O’Brien L, Woolard J, Cauffman E, Banich M. Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Dev 2009; 80(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):28–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer M, Chytilová J. The impact of education on the subjective discount rate in Ugandan villages, in Social Science Research Network. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4057. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1369803. Last accessed on December 18, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• de Wit H, Flory JD, Acheson A, McCloskey M, Manuck SB. IQ and nonplanning impulsivity are independently associated with delay discounting in middle-aged adults. Pers Individ Diff 2007; 42(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaroni JL, Wright SM, Lerman C, Epstein LH. Relationship between education and delay discounting in smokers. Addict Behav 2004; 29(6):1171–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanjiang D, Green L, Myerson J. Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychol Rec 2002; 52(4):479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey SF, Gudleski GD, Saladin ME, Brady KT. Impulsivity and rapid discounting of delayed hypothetical rewards in cocaine-dependent individuals. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2003; 11(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):18–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil SH, Johnson MW, Higgins ST, Bickel WK. Delay discounting in currently using and currently abstinent cocaine-dependent outpatients and non-drug-using matched controls. Addict Behav 2006; 31(7):1290–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby KN, Petry NM, Bickel WK. Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. J Exp Psychol Gen 1999; 128(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):78–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden GJ, Bickel WK, Jacobs EA. Discounting of delayed rewards in opioid-dependent outpatients: Exponential or hyperbolic discounting functions? Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 1999; 7(3):284–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petry NM. Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls. Psychopharmacology 2001; 154(3):243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards JB, Zhang L, Mitchell SH, De Wit H. Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: Effect of alcohol. J Exp Anal Behav 1999; 71(2):121–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel WK, Odum AL, Madden GJ. Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: Delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology 1999; 146(4):447–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell SH. Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers. Psychopharmacology 1999; 146(4):455–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker F, Johnson MW, Bickel WK. Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: Similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude. J Abnorm Psychol 2003; 112(3):382–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MW, Bickel WK, Baker F. Moderate drug use and delay discounting: A comparison of heavy, light, and never smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2007; 15(2):187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MW, Bickel WK, Baker F, Moore BA, Badger GJ, Budney AJ. Delay discounting in current and former marijuana-dependent individuals. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2010; 18(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):99–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crean JP, de Wit H, Richards JB. Reward discounting as a measure of impulsive behavior in a psychiatric outpatient population. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2000; 8(2):155–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heerey EA, Robinson BM, McMahon RP, Gold JM. Delay discounting in schizophrenia. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2007; 12(3):213–221.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shamosh NA, DeYoung CG, Green AE, Reis DL, Johnson MR, Conway ARA, Engle RW, Braver TS, Gray JR. Individual differences in delay discounting. Psychol Sci 2008; 19(9):904–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel WK, Yi R, Landes RD, Hill PF, Baxter C. Remember the future: Working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 69(3):260–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachlin H, Green L. Commitment, choice and self-control. J Exp Anal Behav 1972; 17(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Wertenbroch K. Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by precommitment. Psychol Sci 2002; 13(3):219–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chick J, Gough K, Falkowski W, Kershaw P, Hore B, Mehta B, Ritson B, Ropner R, Torley D. Disulfiram treatment of alcoholism. Br J Psychiatry 1992; 161(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):84–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krampe H, Stawicki S, Wagner T, Bartels C, Aust C, Rüther E, Poser W, Ehrenreich H. Follow-up of 180 alcoholic patients for up to 7 years after outpatient treatment: Impact of alcohol deterrents on outcome. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2006; 30(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):86–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins ST, Sigmon SC, Budney AJ. Psychosocial treatment for cocaine dependence: The community reinforcement plus vouchers approach. In Treating Chronic and Severe Mental Disorders: A Handbook of Empirically Supported Interventions. Hofmann SG, Tompson MC, eds. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2002; 296–313.
   Google Scholar
• Shaner A, Eckman TA, Roberts LJ, Wilkins JN, Tucker DE, Tsuang JW, Mintz J. Disability income, cocaine use, and repeated hospitalization among schizophrenic cocaine abusers: A government-sponsored revolving door? N Engl J Med 1995; 333(12):777–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartz JA, Hsieh, CM, Baumohl J. Disability payments, drug use and representative payees: An analysis of the relationships. Addiction 2003; 98(7):965–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Q J Econ 1991; 106(4):1039–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. J Risk Uncertainty 1988; 1(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):7–59.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Goldstein DG. Do defaults save lives? Science 2003; 302:1338–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadie A, Gay S. The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: A cross-country study. J Health Econ 2006; 25(4):599–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossialos E, Costa-Font J, Rudisill C. Does organ donation legislation affect individuals’ willingness to donate their own or their relative’s organs? Evidence from European Union survey data. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman GB, Li M, Colby H, Yoon H. Opting in vs opting out of influenza vaccination. J Am Med Assoc 2010; 304(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):43–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH. Heuristics and biases in retirement savings behavior. J Econ Perspect 2007; 21(3):81–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrian BC, Shea DF. The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Q J Econ 2001; 116(4):1149–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A. Defined Contribution Pensions: Plan Rules, Participant Decisions and the Path of Least Resistance. In James M. Poterba, ed., Tax policy and the economy, Vol. 16. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002; 67–113.
   Google Scholar
• Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A. Default effects and 401 (k) savings behavior. In Perspectives on the Economics of Aging. Wise DA, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004;81–125.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Benartzi S. Save More Tomorrow™: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J Polit Econ 2004; 112(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):S164–S187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979; 47(2):263–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J Polit Econ 1990; 98(6):1325–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knetsch JL. The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. Am Econ Rev 1989; 79(5):1277–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler R. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Mark Sci 1985; 4(3):199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler R, Johnson EJ. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Manag Sci 1990; 36(6):643–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. Am Psychol 1984; 39(4):341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler R. Mental accounting matters. J Behav Decis Making 1999; 12:183–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath C, Soll JB. Mental budgeting and consumer decisions. J Consum Res 1996; 23(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):40–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shefrin HM, Thaler RH. Mental accounting, saving, and self-control. In Advances in Behavioral Economics. Camerer CF, Loewenstein G, Rabin M, eds. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 2004; 395–428.
   Google Scholar
• Arkes HR, Joyner CA, Pezzo MV, Nash JG, Siegel-Jacobs K, Stone E. The psychology of windfall gains. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1994; 59(3):331–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milkman KL, Beshears J. Mental accounting and small windfalls: Evidence from an online grocer. J Econ Behav Organ 2009; 71(2):384–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber M, Zuchel H. How do prior outcomes affect risk attitude? Comparing escalation of commitment and the house-money effect. Decis Anal 2005; 2(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ackert L, Charupat N, Church B, Deaves R. An experimental examination of the house money effect in a multi-period setting. Exp Econ 2006; 9(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeler JP, James WL, Abdel-Ghany M. The relative size of windfall income and the permanent income hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 1985; 3(3):209–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid MG. Consumption, savings, and windfall gains. Am Econ Rev 1962; 52(4):728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Novemsky N, Wang J, Dhar R, Nowlis S. Opportunity cost neglect. J Consum Res 2009; 36(4):553–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magen E, Dweck CS, Gross JJ. The hidden-zero effect. Psychol Sci 2008; 19(7):648–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins ST, Budney AJ, Bickel WK, Badger GJ, Foerg FE, Ogden D. Outpatient behavioral treatment for cocaine dependence: One-year outcome. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 1995; 3(2):205–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins ST, Budney AJ, Bickel WK, Foerg FE, Donham R, Badger GJ. Incentives improve outcome in outpatient behavioral treatment of cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51(7):568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lussier JP, Heil SH, Mongeon JA, Badger GJ, Higgins ST. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction 2006; 101(2):192–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney J, Greenwell L, Roll J. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Addiction 2006; 101(11):1546–1560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roll JM, Higgins ST. A within-subject comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement of drug abstinence using cigarette smoking as an exemplar. Drug Alcohol Depend 2000; 58(1–2):103–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzion U, Rapoport A, Yagil J. Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study. Manag Sci 1989; 35(3):270–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson MK. Decision making with long-term consequences: Temporal discounting for single and multiple outcomes in the future. J Exp Psychol Gen 1993; 122(1Money Management in Substance Abusers (Guest Editor: Marc Rosen)):3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar