Analogue and Digital Filtering of Auditory Brainstem Responses

References

• Boston J. R., Ainslie P. J. Effects of analog and digital filtering on brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 48: 361
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brigham E. O. The fast Fourier transform. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1974
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. Principles of electric response audiometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976; 85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson W. W., Doddington H. W. Phase distortion of biological signals: extraction of signal from noise without phase error. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1973; 34: 207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desmedt J. E., Brunko E., Debecker J., Carmeliet J. The system bandpass required to avoid distortion of early components when averaging somatosensory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1974; 37: 407
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Don M., Eggermont J. J. Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in man using high-pass noise masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63: 1084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle D. J. Some comments on the use of Wiener filtering for the estimation of evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1975; 38: 533
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doyle D. J. A proposed methodology for evaluation of the Wiener filtering method of evoked potential estimation. Electroencephatogr Clin Neurophysiol 1977; 43: 739
   Google Scholar
• Elberling C. Auditory electrophysiology: spectral analysis of cochlear and brainstem evoked potentials. Scand Audiol 1979; 8: 57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fabiani M., Sohmer H., Tait C., Gafni M., Kinarti R. A functional measure of brain activity: brainstem transmission time. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1979; 47: 483
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galambos R., Hecox K. Clinical applications of the auditory brainstem response. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1978; 11: 709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser E. M., Ruchkin D. S. Principles of neurobiological signal analysis. Academic Press, LondonUK 1976
   Google Scholar
• Jewett D. L., Williston J. S. Auditory evoked far-fields averaged from the scalp of humans. Brain 1971; 94: 681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney R. E. Evaluation of the Wiener filter applied to evoked EMG potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1979; 46: 475
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keating P. N. More accurate interpolation using discrete Fourier transforms. IEEE Trans Acoustics. 1978
   Google Scholar
• Kevanishvili Z., Aphonchenko V. Frequency composition of brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Scand Audiol 1979; 8: 51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuo F. Network analysis and synthesis. Wiley, New York 1966
   Google Scholar
• Lubkin Y. J. Filter systems and design: electrical, microwave and digital. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass 1970
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim A. V., Schafer R. W. Digital signal processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1975
   Google Scholar
• Picton T. W., Hillyard S. A., Krausz H. I., Galambos R. Human auditory evoked potentials, 1. Evaluation of components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1974; 36: 179
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson K., Rudge P. Abnormalities of the auditory evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain 1977; 100: 19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selters W. A., Brackmann D. E. Acoustic tumour detection with brainstem electric response audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr A., Achor L. J. Auditory brainstem responses in neurological disease. Arch Neurol 1975; 32: 761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr A., Amlie R. N., Martin W. H., Sanders S. Development of auditory function in newborn infants revealed by auditory brainstem potentials. Pediatrics 1977; 60: 831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockard J. J., Sharbrough F. W. Unique contributions of the short-latency auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials to neurology diagnosis. Clinical uses of cerebral, brainstem and spinal somatosensory evoked potentials: Vol. 7, Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology, J. E. Desmedt. Karger, Basel 1978
   Google Scholar
• Stockard J. J., Stockard J. E., Sharbrough F. W. Nonpathologic factors influencing brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Am JEEG Technol 1978; 18: 177
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki T., Horiuchi K. Effects of high-pass filter on auditory brainstem responses to tone pips. Scand Audiol 1977; 6: 123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terkildsen K., Osterhammel P., Huis in't Veld F. Far field electrocochleography. Frequency specificity of the response. Scand Audiol 1975; 4: 167
   Google Scholar
• Tan A. C., Rosmalen F. H.M., Hofman J. A., Kloppenborg P. W.C., Benraad Th. J. “Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) in patients with congestive heart failure: immunoreactive peak distributions”. Proceedings of the second world congress on biologically active atrial peptides. New York 1987; 236
   Google Scholar
• Wastell D. G. The application of low-pass linear filters to evoked potential data: filtering without phase distortion. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1979; 46: 355
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiener N. Extrapolation, interpolation and smoothing of stationary time series. Wiley, New York 1949
   Google Scholar