Auditory Perception with Level-Dependent Hearing Protectors The Effects of Age and Hearing Loss

References

• Abel S M. Noise-induced hearing loss and hearing protective devices. Can J Pub Health 1986; 77: 104–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel S M, Alberti P W, Haythornthwaite C, Riko K. Speech intelligibility in noise: effects of fluency and hearing protector type. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 71: 708–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel S M, Alberti P W, Riko K. User fitting of ear protectors: attenuation results. Personal hearing protection in industry, P W. Alberti. Raven Press, New York 1982; 315–32
   Google Scholar
• Abel S M, Alberti P W, Rokas D. Gender differences in real-world hearing protector attenuation. J Otolaryngol 1988; 17: 86–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abel S M, Haythornthwaite C. The progression of noise-induced hearing loss: a survey of workers in selected industries in Canada. J Otolaryngol 1984; 13: 1–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abel S M, Krever E M, Alberti P W. Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners. Scand Audiol 1990; 19: 43–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel S M, Krever E M, Giguère C, Alberti P W. Signal detection and speech perception with level-dependent hearing protectors. J Otolaryngol 1991; 20: 46–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abel S M, Kunov H, Pichora-Fuller M K, Alberti P W. Signal detection in industrial noise: effects of noise exposure history, hearing loss and the use of ear protection. Scand Audiol 1985; 14: 161–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel S M, Rockley T, Goldfarb D, Hawke M. External ear canal shape and its relation to the effectiveness of sound attenuating earplugs. J Otolaryngol 1990; 19: 91–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abel S M, Rokas D. The effect of wearing time on hearing protector attenuation. J Otolaryngol 1986; 15: 293–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Acton W J. History and development of hearing protection devices. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 81: S4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Personal hearing protection in industry, P W. Alberti. Raven Press, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Allen C H, Berger E H. Development of a unique passive hearing protector with level-dependent and flat attenuation characteristics. Noise Control Eng J 1990; 34: 97–105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSI S12.6–1984. Method for the measurement of the real-ear attenuation of hearing protectors. American National Standards Institute, New York 1984
   Google Scholar
• Bchar A. Hearing protector attenuation. Sound Vibr 1983; 17: 9–10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger E H. Using the NRR to estimate the real world performance of hearing protectors. Sound Vibr 1983; 17: 12–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger E H. Hearing protective devices. Noise and hearing conservation manual. 4th ed, E H Berger, W E Ward, J C Morrill, L H. Royster. Am Ind Hyg Assoc, Akron 1986; 319–78
   Google Scholar
• Bergman M. Aging and the perception of speech. University Park Press, Baltimore 1980
   Google Scholar
• Brunt M A. Bekesy audiometry and loudness balance testing. Handbook of clinical audiology. 3rd ed, J. Katz. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1985; 153–69
   Google Scholar
• Daniel W W. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences. 3rd ed. Wiley, New York 1983
   Google Scholar
• Durkin J. Effect of electronic hearing protectors on speech intelligibility. US Dept of the Interior, Washington 1979
   Google Scholar
• Forrest M R, Coles RRA. Problems of communication and ear protection in the royal marines. J Roy Naval Med Serv 1970; 56: 162–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forshaw S E, Crutchley J I. Hearing protector problems in military operations. Personal hearing protection in industry, P W. Alberti. Raven Press, New York 1982; 387–402
   Google Scholar
• Beasley C M, Montgomery S, Tye N C. The behavioral pharmacology of olanzapine, a novel ‘atypical’ antipsychotic agent. Second International Conference on Schizophrenia. Vancouver, Canada 1992
   Google Scholar
• Giguère C, Abel S M. A multi-purpose facility for research on hearing protection. Appl Acoust 1990; 31: 295–311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L E. A psychophysical evaluation of the dependence of hearing protector attenuation on noise level. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 297–311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalikow D N, Stevens K N, Elliott L L. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am 1977; 61: 1337–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazden S D, D'Aniello A. Changes in attenuation of hearing protectors during use. Proc of NOI-SEXPO 1976, J K. Mowry. Acoust Pub, Bay Village, Ohio 1976; 28–9
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell D W, Williams C E, Robertson R M, Thomas G B. Performance characteristics of active hearing protection devices. Sound Vibr 1987; 21: 14–8
   Google Scholar
• Mosko J D, Fletcher J L. Evaluation of the Gundefender earplug: temporary threshold shift and speech intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49: 1732–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riko K, Alberti P W. How ear protectors fail: a practical guide. Personal hearing protection in industry, P W. Alberti. Raven Press, New York 1982; 323–38
   Google Scholar
• Scharf B. Critical bands. Foundations of modern auditory theory, vol. 1, J V. Tobias. Academic, New York 1970; 159––202
   Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G F, ten Raa BH., Mimpen A M. Real-world attenuation of hearing protectors. Proc of 12th Int Congr on Acoustics. TorontoCanada 1986
   Google Scholar
• Suter A H, Lempert B L, Franks J R. Real-ear attenuation of earmuffs in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 2114–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur R. Reviewof hearing loss claims in Canada. Workers Compensation Board. Presat Amer Indus Hyg Assoc Mtg, Montreal, Quebec 1987
   Google Scholar
• Yantis P A. Purctone air-conduction testing. Handbook of clinical audiology. 3rd ed, J. Katz. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1985; 153–69
   Google Scholar