References
- Clouser R. Relative phoneme visibility and lipreading performance. Volta Rev 1977; 79: 27–34
- Crawford J, Dancer J, Pittenger J. Initial performance level on a speechreading task as related to subsequent improvement after short-term training. Volta Rev 1986; 88: 101–5
- Davis H, Silverman SR. Hearing and deafness. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York 1970
- De Filippo CL. Speechreading training: Believe it or not. ASHA 1990; 32: 46–8
- De Filippo CL, Scott BL. A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63: 1186–92
- DeLand F. The story of lipreading. Its genesis and development. The Alexander Bell Association for the Deaf, Washington 1968
- Dodd B, Plant G, Gregory M. Teaching lip-reading: the efficacy of lessons on video. Br J Audiol 1989; 23: 229–38
- Fenn G, Smith BZD. The assessment of lipreading ability: some practical considerations in the use of the tracking procedure. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 253–8
- Hochberg I, Rosen I, Ball V. Effect of text complexity in connected discourse tracking rate. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 192–9
- Jackson P. The theoretical minimal unit for visual speech perception. Visemes and coarticulation. New reflections in speechreading, Filippo CL. De, DG. Sims. Volta Rev. 1988; 90: 99–118
- Jacobs M. Programmed self instruction in speechreading. J Acad Rehab Audiol 1975; 8: 106–9
- Jeffers J, Barley M. Speechreading (Lipreading). Charles C. Thomas, Springfield 1971
- Lesner SA, Sandridge SA, Kricos PB. Training influences on visual consonant and sentence recognition. Ear Hear 1987; 8: 283–7
- Lonka E. Huulioluvun harjoituksia. [Speechreading exercises.]. KP-paino, Kokkola 1990
- Operation Helen. Auditive, visual & audio-visual perception of speech, C Ludvigsen. Stougard Jensen, Copenhagen 1981
- Lyxell B, Rönnberg J. Visual speech processing: word-decoding and word-discrimination related to sentence-based speechreading and hearing-impairment. Scand Psychol 1991; 32: 9–17
- Lyxell B, Rönnberg J. The relationship between verbal ability and sentence-based speechreading. Scand Audiol 1992; 21: 67–72
- Matthies ML, Carney AE. A modified speech tracking procedure as a communicative performance measure. J Speech Hear Res 1988; 31: 394–404
- Montgomery AA, Demorest ME. Issues and developments in the evaluation of speechreading. New reflections in speechreading, Filippo CL. De, DG. Sims. Volta Rev. 1988; 90: 193–214
- Montgomery AA, Walden BE, Schwartz DM, Prosek RA. Training auditory-visual speech reception in adults with moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 1984; 5: 30–6
- Owens E, Raggio M. The UCSF tracking procedure for evaluation and training of speech reception by hearing-impaired adults. J Speech Hear Disord 1987; 52: 120–8
- Pesonen J. Phoneme communication of the deaf. Theory and elementary visio-oral verbal education by means of individualized visiophonemes. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae B 1968; 151.2
- Rihkanen H. Rehabilitation assessment of postlingually deaf adults using single-channel intracochlear implants or vibrotactile aids. A prospective clinical study. University of Helsinki, HelsinkiFinland 1988
- Rönnberg J. Cognitive and communicative function: the effects of chronological age and ‘handicap age’. Eur J Cogn Psychol 1990; 2: 253–73
- Samar VJ, Sims DG. Visual evoked response correlates of speechreading performance in normal hearing adults: a replication and factor analytic extension. J Speech Hear Res 1983; 26: 2–9
- Samuelsson S, Rönnberg J. Implicit and explicit use of scripted constraints in lip-reading. Eur J Cogn Psych 1993; 5: 201–33
- Shepherd DC. Visual-neural correlate of speechreading ability in normal hearing adults. J Speech Hear Res 1982; 25: 521–7
- Shepherd DC, DeLavergne RW, Fruch FX, Clobridge C. Visual-neural correlate of speechreading ability in normal hearing adults. J Speech Hear Res 1977; 20: 752–65
- Sims DG. Video methods for speechreading instruction. New reflections in speechreading, Filippo CL. De, DG. Sims. Volta Rev. 1988; 90: 273–88
- Skamris NP. Mundaflæsning. En undersøgelse af døvblevnes og normaltherørendes mundaflæsningsevne. Odense universitet, OdenseDenmark 1983
- Spens KE, Gnosspelius J, Öhngren G., Plant G, Risberg A. Numerical aspects of the speech tracking procedure. STL-QPSR. Royal Institute for Technology, Stockholm 1992; 1: 115–130
- Squires SC, Dancer JE. Auditory versus visual practice effects in the intelligibility of words in everyday sentences. J Aud Res 1986; 26: 5–10
- Sulkala H, Karjalainen M. Descriptive grammars. Routledge Finnish, London, New York 1992
- Wallden BE, Erdman SA, Montgomery AA, Schwartz DM, Prosek RA. Some effects of training on speechreading recognition by hearing-impaired adults. J Speech Hear Res 1981; 24: 207–16
- Wallden BE, Prosek RA, Montgomery AA, Scherr CK, Jones CJ. Effects of training on the visual recognition of consonants. J Speech Hear Res 1977; 20: 130–45
- Warren Y, Dancer J, Monfils B, Pittenger J. The practice effect in speechreading distributed over five days: same versus different CID-sentence lists. Volta Rev 1989; 91: 321–5