References
- Abrams HB, Hnath-Chisolm T, Guerreiro SM, Ritterman SI. The effects of intervention strategy on self-perception of hearing handicap. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 371–7
- Alberti PW, Pichora-Fuller MK, Corbin H, Riko K. Aural rehabilitation in a teaching hospital: evaluation and results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1984; 93: 589–94
- Cherry R, Rubinstein A. The effect of telephone intervention on success with amplification. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 256–61
- Mulrow CD, Tuley MR, Aguilar C. Sustained benefits of hearing aids. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 1402–5
- Ovegård A, Ramström A-B. Individual follow-up of hearing aid fitting. Scand Audiol 1994; 23: 57–63
- Pascoe DP. Post-fitting and rehabilitative management of the adult hearing aid user. Handbook of hearing aid amplification, vol II, RE. Sandlin. College-Hill Press, Boston 1990; 61–86
- Rubinstein A, Cherry R. The effect of letters on requests for clinic services following hearing aid prescription. J Acad Rehab Audiol 1988; 21: 121–8
- Shearer WM. Research procedures in speech, language, and hearing. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1982
- Taylor K. Self-perceived and audiometric evaluations of hearing aid benefit in the elderly. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 390–4
- Ward PR. Effectiveness of aftercare for older people prescribed a hearing aid for the first time. Scand Audiol 1981; 10: 99–106
- Ward R, Tudor C, Gowers J. Evaluation of follow-up services for elderly people prescribed hearing aids: report of a pilot project. Br J Audiol 1978; 12: 127–34