Active Noise Reduction versus Conventional Hearing Protection Relative Benefits for Normal-Hearing and Impaired Listeners

References

• Abel SM. Indices of communication handicap in mildly hearing-impaired listeners. Canadian Acoustics 1993; 21(3)25–6
   Google Scholar
• Abel S M, Alberti P W, Riko K. User fitting of hearing protectors: attenuation results. Personal hearing protection in industry, P W Alberti. Raven, New York 1982; 315–22
   Google Scholar
• Abel S M, Alberti P W, Haylhointhwaite C, Riko K. Speech intelligibility in noise: effects of fluency and hearing protector type. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 71: 708–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel S M, Armstrong N M, Giguère C. Auditory perception with level-dependent hearing protectors: the effects of age and hearing loss. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 71–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel S M, Hay V H. Sound localization: the interaction of HPDs aging and hearing loss. Scand Audiol 1996; 25: 3–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel S M, Krever E M, Alberti P W. Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners. Scand Audiol 1990; 19: 43–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel S M, Kunov H, Pichora-Fuller M K, Alberti P W. Signal detection in industrial noise: effects of noise exposure history, hearing loss, and the use of ear protection. Scand Audiol 1985; 14: 161–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel S M, Rockley T, Goldfarb D, Hawke M. External ear canal shape and its relation to the effectiveness of sound attenuating earplugs. J Otolaryngol 1990; 19: 91–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ANSI. S12.6–1984. Method for the measurement of the real-ear attenuation of hearing protectors. American National Standards Institute, New York 1984
   Google Scholar
• ANSI. S3.1–1991. Maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms. American National Standards Institute, New York 1991
   Google Scholar
• Bilger R C, Nuetzel M J, Rabinowitz W M, Rzeezkowski C. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27: 32–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blauert J. Spatial hearing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1983
   Google Scholar
• Brunt M A. Bekesy audiometry and loudness balanee testing. Handbook of clinical audiology, 3rd ed, J Katz. Williams & Wilkins., Baltimore 1985; 273–91
   Google Scholar
• Conover W J, Iman R J. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and non- parametric statistics. Am Stat 1981; 35: 124–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSA. Z94.2–94. Canadian Standards Association, Hearing protectors, Rexdale, Ontario 1994
   Google Scholar
• Daniel W W. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences, 3rd ed. Wiley, New York 1983
   Google Scholar
• Dreschler W A, Plomp R. Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. II. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 78: 1261–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filzgibbons P J, Gordon-Salant S. Age effects on duration discrimination with simple and complex stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 98: 3140–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasaway D C. Hearing conservation: a practical manual and guide. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ 1985
   Google Scholar
• Giguère C, Abel S M. A multi-purpose facility for research on hearing protection. Appl Acoust 1990; 31: 295–311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giguère C, Abel S M. Sound localization: effects of reverberation time, speaker array, stimulus frequency and stimulus rise/decay. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 769–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower DW, Jr., Casali J G. Speech intelligibility and protective effectiveness of selected active noise reduction and conventional communication headsets. Human Factors 1994; 36: 350–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green D M. An introduction to hearing. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ 1976
   Google Scholar
• Green D M, Swets J A. Signal detection theory and psycho-physics. Wiley, New York 1966
   Google Scholar
• Horst J W. Frequency discrimination of complex signals, frequency selectivity, and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 874–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König E. Pitch discrimination and age. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1957; 8: 475–89
   Google Scholar
• McKinley R L, Steuver J W, Nixon C W. Estimated reductions in noise-induced hearing loss by application of ANR headsets. Scientific basis of noise-induced hearing loss, A Axelsson, H M Borchgrevink, R P Hamernik, PA Hellström, D Henderson, R J Salvi. Thieme, New York 1996; 347–60
   Google Scholar
• Musicant A D, Butler R A. The influence of pinnae-based spectral cues on sound localization. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 75: 1195–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson D A, Freyman R L. Psychometric functions for frequency discrimination from listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 799–805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon C W, McKinley R L, Steuver J W. Performance of active noise reduction headsets. Noise-induced hearing loss, A L Dancer, D Henderson, R J Salvi, R P Hamernik. Mosby, New York 1992; 389–400
   Google Scholar
• Schneider B A, Pichora-Fuller M K, Kowalchuk D, Lamb M. Gap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 980–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter A H, Lemperl B L, Franks J R. Real-ear attenuation of earmuffs in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 2114–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson M E. Speech discrimination skills in the elderly: a critical review. J Otolaryngol 1987; 16: 354–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner C W, Nelson D A. Frequency discrimination in regions of normal and impaired sensitivity. J Speech Hear Res 1982; 25: 34–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yantis P A. Puretone air-conduction testing. Handbook of clinical audiology, 3rd ed, J Katz. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1985; 153–69
   Google Scholar
• Zera J, Brammer A J, Pan G J. Comparison between subjective and objective measures of active hearing protection and communication headset attenuation. J Acoust Soc Am 1997, in press
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar