References
- Anderson MB, Swanson AG. Educating medical students: The ACME-TRI report with supplements. Acad Med 1993; 68(suppl)S1–S46
- Association of American Medical Colleges. Physicians for the twenty-first century: Report of the project panel on the general professional education of the physicians and college preparation for medicine. J Med Educ 1984; 59: 1–28
- Barrows HS. How to design a problem based curriculum for the preclinical years. Springer, New York 1985
- Dahle LO, Brynhildsen J, Fallsberg MB, Rundquist I, Hammar M. Pros and cons of vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum: Examples and experiences from Linkoping, Sweden. Med Teach 2002; 24: 280–285
- Fogarty R. How to integrate curricula. Palatine. IRI/Skylight Training and Publishing, Inc, Illinois 1991
- General Medical Council. Tomorrow's doctors: Outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. General Medical Council, London 2009
- Harden RM. The integration ladder: A tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Med Educ 2000; 34: 551–557
- Harden RM, Sowden S, Dunn WR. Some educational strategies in curriculum development: The SPICES model. ASME Medical Education Booklet number 18. Med Educ 1984; 18: 284–297
- McAleer S. Choosing assessment instruments. A practical guide for medical teachers, JA Dent, RM Harden. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh 2001; 303–313
- Spady W. Choosing outcomes of significance. Educ Leadersh 1994; 51: 18–22
- Wilkerson L, Stevens CM, Krasne S. No content without context: Integrating basic, clinical, and social sciences in a pre-clerkship curriculum. Med Teach 2009; 31: 812–821