A single generic multi-source feedback tool for revalidation of all UK career-grade doctors: Does one size fit all?

References

• Archer JC, Norcini J, Davies HA. Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training. Br Med J 2005; 330: 1251–1253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett H, Gatrell J, Packham R. Medical appraisal: Collecting evidence of performance through 360° feedback. Clin Manage 2004; 12: 1–7
   Google Scholar
• Bracken DW, Timmreck CW, Church AH. The handbook of multisource feedback: The comprehensive resource for designing and implementing MSF processes. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 2001
   Google Scholar
• Bullock AD, Hassell A, Markham WA, Wall DW, Whitehouse AB. How ratings vary by staff group in multi-source feedback assessment of junior doctors. Med Educ 2009; 43(6)516–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campell JL, Richards SH, Dickens A, Greco M, Narayanan A, Brearley S. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: An evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Councils patient and colleague questionnaires. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; 17: 187–193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crossley J, McDonnell J, Cooper C, McAvoy P, Archer J, Davies H. Can a district hospital assess its doctors for re-licensure?. Med Educ 2008; 42(4)359–363
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crossley J, Wilkinson J, Davies H, Wade W, Archer J, McAvoy P, Putting the 360 into multi source feedback. Abstract presented at The Association for the Study of Medical Education's conference on multi source feedback. London, UK: 13 December 2006
   Google Scholar
• Davies HA, Archer JC. Multi-source feedback: Development and practical aspects. Clin Teach 2005; 2: 77–81
   Google Scholar
• Davies H, Archer J, Bateman A, Dewar S, Crossley J, Grant J, Southgate L. Specialty specific multisource feedback – Assuring validity, informing training. Med Educ 2008; 42: 1014–1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health 2007. Trust, assurance and safety – The regulation of health professionalism the 21st century. London, UK: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Lewis M, Evans R, Hutchings H. Using a ‘Peer Assessment Questionnaire’ in primary medical care. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55(518)690–695
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• General Medical Council. Good medical practice. GMC, London 2006
   Google Scholar
• General Medical Council 2010. Revalidation: The way ahead. GMC consultation document. London: GMC. Available from http://www.gmc-uk.org/doctors/licensing/5794.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin E, Sanders C, Craven D, King J. A computerised 360° feedback tool for personal and organisational development in general practice. Health Inf J 2000; 6: 71–80
   Google Scholar
• Hesketh EA, Anderson F, Bagnall GM, Driver CP, Johnston DA, Marshall D, Needham G, Orr G, Walker K. Using a 360° diagnostic screening tool to provide an evidence trail of junior doctors performance throughout their first postgraduate year. Med Teach 2005; 27(3)219–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmboe ES, Wang Y, Meehan TP, Tate JP, Ho SY, Starkey KS, Lipner RS. Association between maintenance of certification examination scores and quality of care for medicare beneficiaries. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168(13)1396–1403
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irvine D. Maintaining good medical practice. General Medical Council, LondonUK 1998
   Google Scholar
• Lelliot P, Williams R, Mears A, Andiappan M, Owen H, Reading P, Coyle N, Hunter S. Questionnaires for 360-degree assessment of consultant psychiatrists: Development and psychometric properties. Br J Psychiatry 2008; 193: 156–160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lipner RS, Blank LL, Leas BF, Fortna GS. The value of patient and peer ratings in recertification. Acad Med 2002; 77(10)S64–S66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lockyer J. Multi-source feedback in the assessment of physicians competencies. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2003; 23: 4–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lockyer JM, Violato C. An examination of the appropriateness of using a common peer assessment instrument to assess physicians skills across specialities. Acad Med 2004; 79(10)S5–S8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mackillop LH, Armitage M, Wade W. Collaborating with patients and carers to develop a patient survey to support consultant appraisal and revalidation. Clin Manage 2006; 14: 89–94
   Google Scholar
• Mason R, Chaudhry N, Hartley E, Ayers B. Developing an effective system of 360-degree appraisal for consultants: Results of a pilot study. Clin Governance Bull 2003; 4: 11–12
   Google Scholar
• Murphy D, Bruce D, Mercer S, Eva K. The reliability of work-based assessment in postgraduate medical education and training: A national evaluation in general practice in the United Kingdom. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008; 14(2)219–232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norcini JJ, Kimball HR, Lipner RS. Certification and specialization: Do they matter in the outcome of acute myocardial infarction?. Acad Med 2000; 75(12)1193–1198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physicians performance. J Am Med Assoc 1993; 269: 1655–1660
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sargeant JM, Mann KV, Ferrier SN, Langille DB, Muirhead PD, Hayes VM, Sinclair DE. Responses of rural family physicians and their colleagues and co-worker raters to multi-source feedback process. Acad Med 2003; 78(10)S42–S44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Royal College of Radiologists. 360⁰ Appraisal – Good practice for radiologists. The Royal College of Radiologists, London 2004
   Google Scholar
• Thomas P, Gebo K, Hellmann D. A pilot study of peer review in residency training. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14: 551–554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Violato C, Lockyer JM, Fidler H. Assessment of pediatricians by a regulatory authority. Pediatrics 2006; 117(3)796–802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Giles LM, Ramsay PG. Ratings of the performances of practicing internists by hospital-based registered nurses. Acad Med 1993; 68: 680–687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehouse A, Hassell A, Wood L, Wall D, Walzman M, Campbell I. Development and reliability testing of TAB a form for 360° assessment of senior house officers’ professional behaviour, as specified by the General Medical Council. Med Teach 2005; 27(3)252–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehouse A, Walzman M, Wall D. Pilot study of 360 degrees assessment of personal skills to inform record of in training assessments for senior house officers. Hosp Med 2002; 63: 172–175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson J, Crossley J, Wragg A, Mill P, Cowan G, Wade W. Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom. Med Educ 2008; 42: 364–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson J, Wade W. New methods of performance assessment for trainees. R Coll Pathol Bull 2005; 132: 12–15
   Google Scholar