Exploring the validity and reliability of a questionnaire for evaluating veterinary clinical teachers’ supervisory skills during clinical rotations

References

• American Education Research Association and American Psychological Association. Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Education Research Association, Washington, DC 1999
   Google Scholar
• Beckman TJ, Cook DA, Mandrekar JN. What is the validity evidence for assessments of clinical teaching?. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20(12)1159–1164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beckman TJ, Ghosh AK, Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Mandrekar JN. How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19(9)971–977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman TJ, Mandrekar JN. The interpersonal, cognitive and efficiency domains of clinical teaching: Construct validity of a multi-dimensional scale. Med Educ 2005; 39(12)1221–1229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brennan RL. Generalizability theory. Springer, New York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 2001
   Google Scholar
• Collins A, Brown JS, Holum A. Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. Am Educ 1991; 15(3)6–11
   Google Scholar
• Copeland HL, Hewson MG. Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical center. Acad Med 2000; 75(2)161–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley J, Davies H, Humphris G, Jolly B. Generalisability: A key to unlock professional assessment. Med Educ 2002; 36(10)972–978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daelmans HEM, Hoogenboom RJI, Donker AJM, Scherpbier AJJA, Stehouwer CDA, van der Vleuten CPM. Effectiveness of clinical rotations as a learning environment for achieving competences. Med Teach 2004; 26(4)305–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Gerver WJ, De Grave W, Scherpbier AJJA. Providing physicians with feedback on how they supervise students during patient contacts. Med Teach 2004; 26(5)409–414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing SM. Validity: On meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 2003; 37(9)830–836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronlund NE. How to construct achievement tests. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1988
   Google Scholar
• Kilminster SM, Jolly BC. Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: A literature review. Med Educ 2000; 34(10)827–840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korthagen FAJ, Vasalos A. Levels in reflection: Core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teach Teach Theory Pract 2005; 11(1)47–71
   Google Scholar
• Lane IF, Strand E. Clinical veterinary education: Insights from faculty and strategies for professional development in clinical teaching. J Vet Med Educ 2008; 35(3)397–406
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leinster S. Learning in the clinical environment. Med Teach 2009; 31(2)79–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litzelman DK, Stratos GA, Marriott DJ, Skeff KM. Factorial validation of a widely disseminated educational framework for evaluating clinical teachers. Acad Med 1998; 73(6)688–695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald RP, Ho MH. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol Methods 2002; 7(1)64–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prideaux D, Alexander H, Bower A, Dacre J, Haist S, Jolly B, Norcini J, Roberts T, Rothman A, Rowe R, et al. Clinical teaching: Maintaining an educational role for doctors in the new health care environment. Med Educ 2000; 34(10)820–826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Leinster S. AMEE guide no. 34: Teaching in the clinical environment. Med Teach 2008; 30(4)347–364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith BP, Walsh DA. Teaching the art of clinical practice: The veterinary medical teaching hospital, private practice, and other externships. J Vet Med Educ 2003; 30(3)203–206
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snell L, Tallett S, Haist S, Hays R, Norcini J, Prince K, Rothman A, Rowe R. A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: New perspectives and challenges. Med Educ 2000; 34(10)862–870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer J. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Learning and teaching in the clinical environment. BMJ 2003; 326(7389)591–594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Muijtjens AMM, Scherpbier AJJA. The development of an instrument for evaluating clinical teachers: Involving stakeholders to determine content validity. Med Teach 2008; 30(8)272–277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Scherpbier AJJA. Cognitive apprenticeship in clinical practice: Can it stimulate learning in the opinion of students?. Adv Health Sci Educ 2009; 14(4)535–546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Muijtjens AMM, Scherpbier AJJA. The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) as a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of clinical teachers. Acad Med 2010; 85(11)1732–1738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y. Staff development for clinical teachers. Clin Teach 2005; 2(2)104–110
   Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans DHJM, Spencer J, Gelula M, Prideaux D. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME guide no. 8. Med Teach 2006; 28(6)497–526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Hem-Stokroos HH, van der Vleuten CPM, Daelmans HEM, Haarman HJTM, Scherpbier AJJA. Reliability of the clinical teaching effectiveness instrument. Med Educ 2005; 39(9)904–910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar