Mixing it but not mixed-up: Mixed methods research in medical education (a critical narrative review)

References

• Abassi K, Smith R, editors on behalf of British Medical Journal Education Group for Guidelines on Evaluation: Dillner L, Hutchinson L, Kerr J, Leinster S, Matheson K, Peterson S, Rake M, Richards T, Smith R, Wood D, et al. 1999. Guidelines for evaluating papers on educational interventions. BMJ 318(7193):1265–1267
   Google Scholar
• Albanese M, Horowitz S, Moss R, Farrell P. An institutionally funded program for educational research and development grants: It makes dollars and sense. Acad Med 1998; 73(7)756–761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albanese MA, Mitchell S. Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acad Med 1993; 68(1)52–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alise MA, Teddlie CA. Continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. J Mixed Methods Res 2010; 4(2)103–126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew S, Halcomb EJ. Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford 2009
   Google Scholar
• Baernstein A, Liss HK, Carney PA, Elmore JG. Trends in study methods used in undergraduate medical education research, 1969-2007. JAMA 2007; 298(9)1038–1045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour RS. Mixing qualitative methods: Quality assurance or qualitative quagmire?. Qual Health Res 1998; 8(3)352–361
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barbour RS. The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy 1999; 4(1)39–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog?. BMJ 2001; 322(7294)1115–1117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson K, Hartz AJ. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 2004; 342(25)1878–1886
   Google Scholar
• Bergman MM. On concepts and paradigms in mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res 2010; 4: 171–175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsjø P. Qualitative and quantitative research – Is there a gap, or only verbal disagreement?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78(7)559–562
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berkson L. Problem-based learning: Have the expectations been met?. Acad Med 1993; 68(10 Suppl)S79–S88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhopal R. Concepts of epidemiology: Integrating the ideas, theories, principles and methods of epidemiology, 2nd. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008
   Google Scholar
• Bligh J, Anderson MB. Medical teachers and evidence. Med Educ 2000; 34(3)162–163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borrego M, Douglas EP, Amelink CT. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education. J Eng Educ 2009; 98(1)53–66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton M, Fitzpatrick R, Swinburn C. Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies. J Eval Clin Pract 1996; 2(3)171–179
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradley P, Cooper S, Duncan F. A mixed-methods study of interprofessional learning of resuscitation skills. Med Educ 2009; 43(9)912–922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: Developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res 2007; 42(4)1758–1772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley P, Oterholt C, Nordheim L, Bjorndal A. Medical students’ and tutors’ experiences of directed and self-directed learning programs in evidence-based medicine – A qualitative evaluation accompanying a randomized controlled trial. Eval Rev 2005; 29(2)149–177
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broeder JL, Donze A. The role of qualitative research in evidence-based practice. Neonatal Netw 2010; 29(3)197–202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bryman A. Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. J Mixed Methods Res 2007; 1(1)8–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson-Brockmann W, Roll D. Single-case experimental designs in medical education: An innovative research method. Acad Med 1996; 71(1)78–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchanan DR. An uneasy alliance: Combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. Health Educ Q 1992; 19(1)117–135
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bunniss S, Kelly DR. Research paradigms in medical education research. Med Educ 2010; 44(4)358–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell G, Morgan G. Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. Heinemann Educational Books, London 1979
   Google Scholar
• Carney PA, Nierenberg DW, Pipas CF, Brooks WB, Stukel TA, Keller AM. Educational epidemiology: Applying population-based design and analytic approaches to study medical education. JAMA 2004; 292(9)1044–1050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr LT. The strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research: What method for nursing?. J Adv Nurs 1994; 20(4)716–721
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chalmers AF. What is this Thing Called Science?, 2nd. Open University Press, Buckingham 1982
   Google Scholar
• Chapple A, Rogers A. Explicit guidelines for qualitative research: A step in the right direction, a defence of the ‘soft’ option, or a form of sociological imperialism?. Fam Pract 1998; 15(6)556–561
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherryholmes CH. Notes on pragmatism and scientific realism. Educ Res 1992; 21(6)13–17
   Google Scholar
• Cicco-Bloom B, Crabtree BF. The qualitative research interview. Med Educ 2006; 40(4)314–321
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen L, Manion L. Research methods in education, 4th. Routledge, London 1994
   Google Scholar
• Colliver JA. Constructivism and educational research: Hazards for research in medical education. Prof Educ Res Q 1996a; 17(4)2–5
   Google Scholar
• Colliver JA. Science in the postmodern era: Postpositivism and research in medical education. Teach Learn Med 1996b; 8(1)10–18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colliver JA. Constructivism with a dose of pragmatism: A cure for what ails educational research. Adv Health Sci Educ 1999; 4(2)187–190
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colliver JA. Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research and theory. Acad Med 2000; 75(3)259–266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colliver JA. Constructivism: The view of knowledge that ended philosophy or a theory of learning and instruction?. Teach Learn Med 2002a; 14(1)49–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colliver JA. Educational theory and medical education practice: A cautionary note for medical school faculty [Review]. Acad Med 2002b; 77(12 Pt1)1217–1220
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colliver JA. Full-curriculum interventions and small-scale studies of transfer: Implications for psychology-type theory. Med Educ 2004; 38(12)1212–1218
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 2004; 342(25)1887–1892
   Google Scholar
• Cook TD, Shadish WR. Social experiments: Some developments over the past fifteen years. Annu Rev Psychol 1994; 45: 545–580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté L, Turgeon J. Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education. Med Teach 2005; 27(1)71–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox SS, Swanson MS. Identification of teaching excellence in operating room and clinic settings. Am J Surg 2002; 183(3)251–255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2nd. Sage Publications, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Mapping the field of mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res 2009; 3(2)95–108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Garrett AL. The “movement” of mixed methods research and the role of educators. S Afr J Educ 2008; 28(3)321–333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cribb A, Bignold S. Towards the reflexive medical school: The hidden curriculum and medical education research. Stud High Educ 1999; 24(2)195–209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crotty M. The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Curry LA, Nembhard IM, Bradley EH. Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation 2009; 119(10)1442–1452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauphinee WD. Contributions and challenges of medical education research – Response. Acad Med 1996; 71(10)S127–S128
   Google Scholar
• Davies P. What is evidence-based education?. Br J Educ Stud 1999; 47(2)108–121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerath P. The science of context: Modes of response for qualitative researchers in education. Int J Qual Stud Educ 2006; 19(1)97–113
   Google Scholar
• Denzin NK. The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, 2nd. McGraw-Hill, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Sutton A, Shaw R, Miller T, Smith J, Young B, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones D. Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: A quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. J Health Serv Res Policy 2007; 12(1)42–47, [Correction 2008, 13:56]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolmans D, Schmidt H. The advantages of problem-based curricula. Postgrad Med J 1996; 72(851)535–538
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durning SJ, Elnicki ME, Gruppen L, Torre D, Hemmer PA. AMEE spotlight: AMEE 2009 spotlight on educational research. Med Teach 2010; 32(4)340–342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott J. Multimethod approaches in educational research. Int J Disabil Dev Educ 2004; 51(2)135–149
   Google Scholar
• Eva KW. On the limits of systematicity. Med Educ 2008; 42(9)852–853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finucane PM, Johnson SM, Prideaux DJ. Problem-based learning: Its rationale and efficacy. Med J Aust 1998; 168(9)445–448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman CP. Contributions and challenges of medical education research – Response. Acad Med 1996; 71(10)S129
   Google Scholar
• Frye AW, Hoban JD, Richards BF. Capturing the complexity of clinical learning environments with multiple qualitative methods. Eval Health Prof 1993; 16(1)44–60
   Google Scholar
• Gerrity MS, Mahaffy J. Evaluating change in medical school curricula: How did we know where we were going?. Acad Med 1998; 73(9)S55–S59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gillett G. Clinical medicine and the quest for certainty. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58(4)727–738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordan A, Jacquemet S, Golay A. A new approach for patient education: Beyond constructivism. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 38(1)61–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goguen J, Knight M, Tiberius R. Is it science? A study of the attitudes of medical trainees and physicians toward qualitative and quantitative research. Adv Health Sci Educ 2008; 13(5)659–674
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldacre M. The role of cohort studies in medical research. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2001; 10(1)5–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodwin LD, Goodwin WL. Qualitative vs. quantitative research or qualitative and quantitative research?. Nurs Res 1984; 33(6)378–380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grbich C. Qualitative research in health. Sage, London 1999
   Google Scholar
• Green J, Britten N. Qualitative research and evidence based medicine. BMJ 1998; 316(7139)1230–1232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greene JC, Caracelli VJ, Graham WF. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal 1989; 11(3)255–274
   Google Scholar
• Haig A, Dozier M. BEME Guide No 3: Systematic searching for evidence in medical education – Part 1: Sources of information. Med Teach 2003a; 25(4)352–363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haig A, Dozier M. BEME Guide No. 3: Systematic searching for evidence in medical education – Part 2: Constructing searches. Med Teach 2003b; 25(5)463–484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallet CE. Pragmatism and Project 2000: The relevance of Dewey's theory of experimentalism to nursing education. J Adv Nurs 1997; 26(6)1229–1234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harden RM, Grant J, Buckley G, Hart IR. Best evidence medical education (BEME) Guide No. 1: Best evidence medical education. Med Teach 1999; 21(6)553–562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris I. What does “The discovery of grounded theory” have to say to medical education?. Adv Health Sci Educ 2003; 8(1)49–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoddinott P, Pill R. A review of recently published qualitative research in general practice. More methodological questions than answers? Fam Pract 1997; 14(4)313–319
   Google Scholar
• Hoff TJ, Witt LC. Exploring the use of qualitative methods in published health services and management research. Med Care Res Rev 2000; 57(2)139–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe KR. Against the quantitative–qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educ Res 1988; 17(8)10–16
   Google Scholar
• Howe KR. A critique of experimentalism. Qual Inq 2004; 10(1)42–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe A, Dagley V, Hopayian K, Lillicrap M. Patient contact in the first year of basic medical training – Feasible, educational, acceptable?. Med Teach 2007; 29(2–3)237–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivankova NV, Creswell JW, Stick SL. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods 2006; 18(1)3–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis LM, Jervis L, 2005. What is the constructivism in constructive alignment? Biosci Educ Electron J 6 (November):1–14
   Google Scholar
• Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 2004; 33(7)14–26
   Google Scholar
• Kadushin C, Hecht S, Sasson T, Saxe L. Triangulation and mixed methods designs: Practicing what we preach in the evaluation of an Israel experience educational program. Field Methods 2008; 20(1)46–65
   Google Scholar
• Leung WC. Why is evidence from ethnographic and discourse research needed in medical education: The case of problem-based learning. Med Teach 2002; 24(2)169–172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung GM, Johnston JM. Evidence-based medical education – Quo vadis?. J Eval Clin Pract 2006; 12(3)353–364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine DM, Barsky AJ, Fox RC, Freidin RB, Williams SR, Wysong JA. Trends in medical education research: Past, present, and future. J Med Educ 1974; 49(2)129–136
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levinson AJ. Where is evidence-based instructional design in medical education curriculum development?. Med Educ 2010; 44(6)536–537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydens JA, Moskal BM, Pavelich M. Qualitative methods used in the assessment of engineering education. J Eng Educ 2004; 93(1)65–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard L, Albert M, Levinson W. Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. [Qualitative research] BMJ 2008; 337: 459–461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd DA. Can medical education be researched. Med Teach 1991; 13(2)145–148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovejoy FH, Armstrong E. Medical education research retreat. Acad Med 1996; 71(1)3–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyon PMA. Making the most of learning in the operating theatre: Student strategies and curricular initiatives. Med Educ 2003; 37(8)680–688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPherson R, Jones A, Whitehouse CR, O’Neill PA. Small group learning in the final year of a medical degree: A quantitative and qualitative evaluation. Med Teach 2001; 23(5)494–502
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mason J. Linking qualitative and quantitative data analysis. Analyzing Qualitative Data, A Bryman, RG Burgess. Routledge, London 1994; 69–110, Chapter 5
   Google Scholar
• Maudsley G, Williams EMI, Taylor DCM. Junior medical students’ notions of a ‘good doctor’ and related expectations: A mixed methods study. Med Educ 2007; 41(5)476–486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maudsley G, Williams EMI, Taylor DCM. Problem-based learning at the receiving end: A ‘mixed methods’ study of junior medical students’ perspectives. Adv Health Sci Educ 2008; 13(4)435–451
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mawardi BH. Human element in medical education and medical education research [editorial]. J Med Educ 1967; 42(3)279–280
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer RE. Applying the science of learning to medical education. Med Educ 2010; 44(6)543–549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995; 311(6997)109–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvoy P, Richards D. A critical realist rationale for using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. J Res Nurs 2006; 11(1)66–78
   Google Scholar
• McGuire CH. Contributions and challenges of medical education research. Acad Med 1996; 71(10 Suppl)S121–S126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meadows-Oliver M. Does qualitative research have a place in evidence-based nursing practice?. J Pediatr Health Care 2009; 23(5)352–354
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller SI, Fredericks M. Mixed-methods and evaluation research: Trends and issues. Qual Health Res 2006; 16(4)567–579
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moffatt S, White M, Mackintosh J, Howel D. Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research – What happens when mixed method findings conflict?. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6: 10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morse JM. Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nurs Res 1991; 40(2)120–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse JM. Editorial: Myth #93: Reliability and validity are not relevant to qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res 1999a; 9(6)717–718
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM. Editorial: Qualitative generalizability. Qual Health Res 1999b; 9(1)5–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse JM. Editorial: Evolving trends in qualitative research: Advances in mixed-method design. Qual Health Res 2005; 15(5)583–585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse JM. The politics of evidence: Keynote address: First Congress of Qualitative Inquiry. Qual Health Res 2006; 16(3)395–404
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray E. Challenges in educational research. Med Educ 2002; 36(2)110–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylopoulos M, Regehr G. Cognitive metaphors of expertise and knowledge: Prospects and limitations for medical education. Med Educ 2007; 41(12)1159–1165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman I, 2000. A conceptualization of mixed methods: A need for inductive/deductive approach to conducting research. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. 2000 April 24–25. New Orleans, LA, 14pp
   Google Scholar
• Niaz M. A rationale for mixed methods (integrative) research programmes in education. J Philos Educ 2008; 42(2)287–305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niglas K, 1999. Quantitative and qualitative inquiry in educational research: Is there a paradigmatic difference between them? Education-line Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research. 1999 September 22–25. Lahti, Finland. [Published 1999; Accessed 7.11.10] http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001487.htm
   Google Scholar
• Norman GR. Editorial: On science, stories, quality and quantity. Adv Health Sci Educ 1998; 3(2)77–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman GR. Reflections on BEME. Med Teach 2000; 22(2)141–144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman G. Editorial: Theory testing research versus theory-based research. Adv Health Sci Educ 2004; 9(3)175–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman G. Editorial: The joy of science. Adv Health Sci Educ 2006; 11(1)1–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman G. The end of educational science?. Adv Health Sci Educ 2008; 13(4)385–389
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman GR, Eva KW, 2008. Quantitative methods. ASME Monograph, Association for the Study of Medical Education
   Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Schmidt HS. Of what practical use is a baby? Perspectives on educational research as a scientific enterprise. Prof Educ Res Q 1999; 20(3)1–5
   Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Schmidt HG. Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Theory, practice and paper darts. Med Educ 2000; 34(9)721–728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A. Mixed methods research in the health sciences: A quiet revolution. J Mixed Methods Res 2009; 3(1)3–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: A mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 2007a; 7: 85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Integration and publications as indicators of “yield” from mixed methods studies. J Mixed Methods Res 2007b; 1(2)147–163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Research methods & reporting: Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. Br Med J 2010; 341: 4587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Nicholl J, Murphy E. Structural issues affecting mixed methods studies in health research: A qualitative study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009; 9: 82(p 8)
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie AJ, 2000. Positivists, post-positivists, post-structuralists, and post-modernists: Why can’t we all get along? Towards a framework for unifying research paradigms. Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Educational Research, Ponte Vedra, FL, 2000 November 18. 20p
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie AJ, Bustamante RM, Nelson JA. Mixed research as a tool for developing quantitative instruments. J Mixed Methods Res 2010; 4(1)56–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim AN. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement, 2nd. Continuum, London 1992
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan EM. A national study on the attitudes of Irish dental faculty members to faculty development. Eur J Dent Educ 2010; 14(1)43–49
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petersen S. Time for evidence based medical education. BMJ 1999; 318(7193)1223–1224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res 1998; 8(3)341–351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995; 311(6996)42–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope C, Mays N., editors. 1999. Qualitative research in health care. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books
   Google Scholar
• Pope C, Mays N. Critical reflections on the rise of qualitative research. [Research methods & reporting] BMJ 2009; 339: 737–739
   Google Scholar
• Prideaux D. Medical education research: Is there virtue in eclecticism?. Med Educ 2002a; 36(6)502–503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prideaux D. Researching the outcomes of educational interventions: A matter of design – RCTs have important limitations in evaluating educational interventions. BMJ 2002b; 324(7330)126–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor JD. The social construction of nature: Relativist accusations, pragmatist and critical realist responses. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 2004; 88(3)352–376
   Google Scholar
• Prystowsky JB, Bordage G. An outcomes research perspective on medical education: The predominance of trainee assessment and satisfaction. Med Educ 2001; 35(4)331–336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch KF. Introduction to social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW. Learning from attempts to improve schooling: The contribution of methodological diversity. Educ Res 2005; 34(5)25–31
   Google Scholar
• Rees CE, Monrouxe LV. Theory in medical education research: How do we get there?. Med Educ 2010; 44(4)334–339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese AC. Implications of results from cognitive science research for medical education. Med Educ Online 1998; 3(1)1–9
   Google Scholar
• Regehr G. It's NOT rocket science: Rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Med Educ 2010; 44(1)31–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards HM, Schwartz LJ. Ethics of qualitative research: Are there special issues for health services research?. Fam Pract 2002; 19(2)135–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ring L, Gross CR, McColl E. Putting the text back into context: Toward increased use of mixed methods for quality of life research. Qual Life Res 2010; 19(5)613–615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche AM. Making better use of qualitative research: Illustrations from medical education research. Health Educ J 1991; 50(3)131–137
   Google Scholar
• Rorty R. Pragmatism. Int J Psychoanal 2000; 81: 819–823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossman GB, Wilson BL. Number and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Eval Rev 1985; 9(5)627–643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossman GB, Wilson BL, 1991. Numbers and words revisited: Being “shamelessly eclectic”. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1991 April 3–7. Chicago, IL. 20p
   Google Scholar
• Sales CS, Schlaff AL. Reforming medical education: A review and synthesis of five critiques of medical practice. Soc Sci Med 2010; 70(11)1665–1668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Res Nurs Health 2000; 23(3)246–255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski MJ. Justifying qualitative research. [Editorial] Res Nurs Health 2008; 31(3)193–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schifferdecker KE, Reed VA. Using mixed methods research in medical education: Basic guidelines for researchers. Med Educ 2009; 43: 637–644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM. Changing education, changing assessment, changing research?. Med Educ 2004; 38(8)805–812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sestini P. Epistemology and ethics of evidence-based medicine: Putting goal-setting in the right place. J Eval Clin Pract 2010; 16(2)301–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea JA. Mind the gap: Some reasons why medical education research is different from health services research. Med Educ 2001; 35(4)319–320
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shea JA, Arnold L, Mann KV. A RIME perspective on the quality and relevance of current and future medical education research. Acad Med 2004; 79(10)931–938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortell SM. The emergence of qualitative methods in health services research. Health Serv Res 34(5) Pt. 1999; 2: 1083–1090
   Google Scholar
• Stacy R, Spencer J. Assessing the evidence in qualitative medical education research. Med Educ 2000; 34(7)498–500
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tashakkori A, Creswell JW. The new era of mixed methods. J Mixed Methods Res 2007; 1(1)3–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Taylor CR. Perspective: A tale of two curricula: A case for evidence-based education?. Acad Med 2010; 85(3)507–511
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Res Sch 2006; 13(1)12–28
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage, London 2009
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie C, Yu F. Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. J Mixed Methods Res 2007; 1(1)77–100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne S. The role of qualitative research within an evidence-based context: Can metasynthesis be the answer?. Int J Nurs Stud 2009; 46(4)569–575
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trochim WMK, 2006. Positivism & post-positivism. Research methods knowledge base. Web Center for Social Research Methods website. [Published 2006; Accessed 7.11.10]. Available from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/positvsm.php
   Google Scholar
• Van der Vleuten CPM, Dolmans DHJM, Scherpbier AJJA. The need for evidence in education. Med Teach 2000; 22(3)246–250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon DT, Blake RL. Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Acad Med 1993; 68(7)550–563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wartman SA. Research in medical education: The challenge for the next decade. Acad Med 1994; 69(8)608–614
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson HJ. The myth of objectivity: Is medicine moving towards a social constructivist medical paradigm?. [Review] Fam Pract 2000; 17(2)203–209
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson I. Qualitative research in medical education. [letter] Med Educ 2010; 44(9)941
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott HF. Posturing in qualitative inquiry. The handbook of qualitative research in education, MD LeCompte, WL Millroy, J Preissle. Academic Press, New York 1992; 3–52
   Google Scholar
• Wolf FM. Lessons to be learned from evidence-based medicine: Practice and promise of evidence-based medicine and evidence-based education. Med Teach 2000; 22(3)251–259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf FM, Shea JA, Albanese MA. Toward setting a research agenda for systematic reviews of evidence of the effects of medical education. Teach Learn Med 2001; 13(1)54–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woolf K. Surely this can’t be proper research? Experiences of a novice qualitative researcher. Clin Teach 2006; 3(1)19–22
   Google Scholar