Peer group reflection helps clinical teachers to critically reflect on their teaching

References

• Arreola RA. Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system, 3rd. Anker Publishing, Bolton, MA 2007
   Google Scholar
• Atwater LE, Waldman DA, Brett JF. Understanding and optimizing multisource feedback. Hum Resour Manage 2002; 41: 193–208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman TJ, Ghosh AK, Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Mandrekar JN. How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 9: 971–977
   Google Scholar
• Berk RA. Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. Int J Teach Learn High Educ 2005; 17: 48–62
   Google Scholar
• Berk RA. Thirteen strategies to measure college teaching. Stylus Publishing, Sterling, VA 2006
   Google Scholar
• Boerboom TBB, Dolmans DHJM, Jaarsma ADC, Muijtjens AMM, van Beukelen P, Scherpbier AJJA. Exploring the validity and reliability of a questionnaire for evaluating veterinary clinical teachers’ supervisory skills during clinical rotations. Med Teach 2011; 33: e84–e91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown KW, Cozby PC, Kee DW, Worden PE. Research methods in human development, 2nd. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA 1999
   Google Scholar
• Cashin WE. Student ratings of professors: Uses and misuses. Seldin P, Hutchings P, editors., In 1999, Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/ tenure decisions. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. pp 25–44
   Google Scholar
• Copeland HL, Hewson MG. Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical center. Acad Med 2000; 75: 161–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNisi AS, Kluger AN. Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved?. Acad Manage Exec 2000; 14: 129–139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Gerver WJ, de Grave W, Scherpbier AJJA. Providing physicians with feedback on how they supervise students during patient contacts. Med Teach 2004; 26: 409–414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluit C, Bolhuis S, Grol R, Laan R, Wensing M. Assessing the quality of clinical teachers. J Gen Intern Med 2010; 25: 1337–1345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdy H, Williams R, Tekian A. Application of “VITALS”: Visual indicators of teaching and learning success in reporting student evaluations of clinical teachers. Educ Health 2001; 14: 267–276
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatton N, Smith D. Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teach Teach Educ 1995; 11: 33–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriksen J. Begeleid intervisiemodel, collegiale advisering en probleemoplossing. [Guided peer model, advising colleagues and problem solving]. Nelissen, Baarn, Netherlands 1997
   Google Scholar
• Korthagen FAJ, Vasalos A. Levels in reflection: Core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teach Teach Theory Pract 2005; 11: 47–71
   Google Scholar
• Lane IF, Strand E. Clinical veterinary education: Insights from faculty and strategies for professional development in clinical teaching. J Vet Med Educ 2008; 35: 397–406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litzelman DK, Stratos GA, Marriott DJ, Lazaridis EN, Skeff KM. Beneficial and harmful effects of augmented feedback on physicians’ clinical-teaching performances. Acad Med 1998; 73: 324–332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Roche LA. Making students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. Am Psychol 1997; 52: 1187–1197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath C, Wai Kit Yeung R, Comfort MB. Development and evaluation of a questionnaire to evaluate clinical dental teachers (ECDT). Br Dent J 2005; 198: 45–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcleod PJ, Steinert Y. Peer coaching as an approach to faculty development. Med Teach 2009; 31: 1043–1044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirink JA, Meijer PC, Verloop N. A closer look at teachers’ individual learning in collaborative settings. Teach Teach Theory Pract 2007; 13: 145–164
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. Sage, Newbury Park, CA 1984
   Google Scholar
• Moore S, Kuol N. Students evaluating teachers: Exploring the importance of faculty reaction to feedback on teaching. Teach High Educ 2005; 10: 57–73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison J. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Evaluation. Brit Med J 2003; 326: 385–387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overeem K, Wollersheim H, Driessen E, Lombarts K, van de Ven G, Grol R, Arah O. Doctors’ perceptions of why 360-degree feedback does (not) work: A qualitative study. Med Educ 2009; 43: 874–882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pee B, Woodman T, Fry H, Davenport ES. Appraising and assessing reflection in students’ writing on a structured worksheet. Med Educ 2002; 36: 575–585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S. Twelve tips to promote excellence in medical teaching. Med Teach 2006; 28: 19–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey PG, Gillmore GM, Irby DM. Evaluating clinical teaching in the medicine clerkship: Relationship of instructor experience and training setting to ratings of teaching effectiveness. J Gen Intern Med 1988; 3: 351–355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross JA, Bruce CD. Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teach Teach Educ 2007; 23: 146–159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant JM, Mann KV, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten CPM, Metsemakers J. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Health Sci Educ 2008; 13: 275–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaub-de Jong MA, Cohen-Schotanus J, Dekker H, Verkerk M. The role of peer meetings for professional development in health science education: A qualitative analysis of reflective essays. Adv Health Sci Educ 2009; 14: 503–513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön DA. Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 1991
   Google Scholar
• Seifert CF, Yukl G, McDonald RA. Effects of multisource feedback and a feedback facilitator on the influence behavior of managers toward subordinates. J Appl Psychol 2003; 88: 561–569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seldin P. Evaluating faculty performance: A practical guide to assessing teaching, research, and service. Anker Publishing, Bolton, MA 2006
   Google Scholar
• Smither JW, London M, Reilly RR. Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Person Psychol 2005; 58: 33–66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell L, Tallett S, Haist S, Hays R, Norcini J, Prince K, Rothman A, Rowe R. A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: New perspectives and challenges. Med Educ 2000; 34: 862–870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Muijtjens AMM, Scherpbier AJJA. The development of an instrument for evaluating clinical teachers: Involving stakeholders to determine content validity. Med Teach 2008; 30: e270–e277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer R, Dolmans D, Wolfhagen I, Peters W, van Coppenolle L, Scherpbier A. Combined student ratings and self-assessment provide useful feedback for clinical teachers. Adv Health Sci Educ 2009; 15: 315–328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, Mann KV. Faculty development: Principles and practices. J Vet Med Educ 2006; 33: 317–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tigelaar DEH, Dolmans DHJM, de Grave WS, Wolfhagen HAP, van der Vleuten CPM. Portfolio as a tool to stimulate teachers' reflections. Med Teach 2006; 28: 277–282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tigelaar DEH, Dolmans DHJM, Meijer PC, de Grave WS, van der Vleuten CPM. Teachers’ interactions and their collaborative reflection processes during peer meetings. Adv Health Sci Educ 2008; 13: 289–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward JR, McCotter SS. Reflection as a visible outcome for preservice teachers. Teach Teach Educ 2004; 20: 243–257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts M, Lawson M. Using a meta-analysis activity to make critical reflection explicit in teacher education. Teach Teach Educ 2009; 25: 609–616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar