Effectiveness of a programme design for the development of competence in solving clinical problems

References

• Anderson JR, Reder LM, Simon HA. Situated learning and education. Educ Researcher 1996; 25: 5–11
   Google Scholar
• Black JB. Assessing student understanding and learning in constructivist study environments. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Washington, DC, 1994 February 13–19, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Boshuizen HPA, Schmidt HG. On the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning by experts, intermediates and novices. Cogn Sci 1992; 16: 153–184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Custers EJFM, Boshuizen HPA, Schmidt HG. The influence of medical expertise, case typicality, and illness script component on case processing and disease probability estimates. Mem Cogn 1996; 24: 384–399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy ME. Methodological triangulation: A vehicle for merging quantitative and qualitative research methods. J Nurs Scholarsh 1987; 19: 130–133
   Google Scholar
• Elstein AS, Schulman LS, Sprafka SA. Medical problem solving: An analysis of clinical reasoning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1978
   Google Scholar
• Eva KW. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2005; 39: 98–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groothuis S, Boshuizen HPA, Talmon JL. Is endocrinology as easy as they say? An analysis of the conceptual difficulties of the domain. Teach Learn Med 1998; 10: 207–217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie J. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analysis relating to achievement. Routledge, London, New York 2009
   Google Scholar
• Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Elsevier/Butterworth Heinemann, Amsterdam/Boston 2008
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver CE, Pfeffer MG. Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cogn Sci 2004; 28: 127–138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson BR, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Researcher 2004; 33: 14–26
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen DH. Learning to solve problems: An instructional design guide. Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA 2004
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner PA, Sweller J, Clark RE. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educ Psychol 2006; 41: 75–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenney S, Nieveen N, Van den Akker J. Design research from a curriculum perspective. Educational design research, J Van den Akker, K Gravemeijer, S McKenny, N Nieveen. Routledge, Taylor & Francis, London, New York 2006; 67–90
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin K, Rikers R, Schmidt H. Is analytic information processing a feature of expertise in medicine?. Adv Health Sci Educ 2008; 13: 123–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman MA. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Moust J, Roebertsen H, Savelsberg H, De Rijk A. Revitalising PBL groups: Evaluating PBL with study teams. Educ Health 2005; 18: 62–73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman GR, Eva KW, Schmidt HG. Implications of psychology-type theories for full curriculum interventions. Med Educ 2005; 39: 247–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas FGWC, Renkl A, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educ Psychol 2003; 38: 1–4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson C. Factors associated with success or failure in radiological interpretation: Diagnostic thinking approaches. Med Educ 1999; 33: 251–259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips CI. Logic in medicine. British Medical Journal Publishing Group, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Ramaekers SPJ, Kremer WDJ, Pilot A, Van Beukelen P, Van Keulen J. Assessment of competence in clinical reasoning and decision making under uncertainty: The script concordance test method. Assess Eval High Educ 2010; 35: 661–673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaekers SPJ, Van Beukelen P, Kremer WDJ, Van Keulen J, Pilot A. A proof-of-concept study of an instructional design for development of competence in solving clinical problems. J Vet Med Educ 2011a; 38(4)360–372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaekers SPJ, Van Keulen J, Kremer WDJ, Pilot A, Van Beukelen P. Effective teaching in case-based education: Patterns in teacher behaviour and their impact on the students’ clinical problem solving and learning. Int J Teach Learn High Educ 2011b; 23(3)303–313
   Google Scholar
• Randel JM, Pugh HL, Reed SK. Differences in expert and novice situation awareness in naturalistic decision making. Int J Human Comput Stud 1996; 45: 579–597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao G. Rational medical decision making: A case-based approach. McGraw-Hill, New York 2007
   Google Scholar
• Seel NM. Epistemology, situated cognition, and mental models: ‘Like a bridge over troubled water’. Instr Sci 2001; 29: 403–427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan M, Wilkes M, Stevenson F, Nguyen T, Slavin S. Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: Effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions. Acad Med 2007; 82: 74–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tousignant M, DesMarchais JE. Accuracy of student self-assessment ability compared to their own performance in a problem-based learning medical program: A correlation study. Adv Health Sci Educ 2002; 7: 19–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Wiel MWJ, Boshuizen HPA, Schmidt HG. Knowledge restructuring in expertise development: Evidence from pathophysiological representations of clinical cases by students and physicians. Eur J Cogn Psychol 2000; 12: 323–356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Wiel MWJ, Schaper NC, Scherpbier AJJA, Van der Vleuten CPM, Boshuizen HPA. Students’ experiences with real-patient tutorials in a problem-based curriculum. Teach Learn Med 1999; 11: 12–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Akker J. Curriculum perspectives: an introduction. Curriculum landscapes and trends, J Van den Akker, W Kuiper, U Hameyer. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 2003; 1–10
   Google Scholar
• Walker A, Leary H. A problem based learning meta analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdiscip J Prob-Based Learn 2009; 3: 12–43
   Google Scholar