Developing research skills in medical students: AMEE Guide No. 69

References

• Association of American Medical Colleges, AAMC, 1998. Learning objectives for medical student education: Guidelines for medical schools. Washington
   Google Scholar
• Association of American Medical Colleges, AAMC, 2001. Contemporary Issues in Medicine, Report IV: Basic science and clinical research. Washington
   Google Scholar
• AKOBENG A. Principles of evidence based medicine. Arch Disease Childhood 2005; 90: 837–840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreatta P, Hillard M, Murphy M, Gruppen L, Mullan P. Short-term outcomes and long-term impact of a programme in medical education for medical students. Med Educ 2009; 43: 260–267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balster N, Pfund C, Rediske R, Branchaw J. Entering research: A course that created community and structure for beginning undergraduate researchers in the STEM disciplines. CBE-Life Sci Educ 2010; 9: 108–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrows H. How to design a problem-based-curriculum for the pre-clinical years. Springer Publishing Co, New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• Berner E, McGowan J, Hardin J, Apooner S, Raszka W, Berkow R. A model for assessing information retrieval and application skills of medical students. Acad Med 2002; 77(6)547–551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom BS, 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives. Tucson, Arizona. Educational Innovators Press
   Google Scholar
• Boninger M, Troen P, Green E, Borkan J, Lance-Jones C, Humphrey A, Gruppuso P, Kant P, McGee J, Willochell M, et al. Implementation of a longitudinal mentored scholarly project: An approach at two medical schools. Acad Med 2010; 85: 429–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoyne L, O'Flynn S, Boylan G. Undergraduate medical research: The student perspective. Med Educ Online 2010; 15: 5212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmen MD, Joffe S. Informed consent for medical treatment and research: A review. The Oncologist 2005; 10: 636–641
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coil D, Wendworth M, Cunningham M. Teaching the process of science: Faculty perceptions and an effective methodology. CBE-Life Sci Educ 2010; 9: 524–535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colliver J. Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research and theory. Acad Med 2000; 75: 259–266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke M, Irby D, Sullivan W, Ludmerer K. American medical education 100 years after the Flexner report. The New Eng J Med 2006; 355(13): 1339–1344
   Google Scholar
• Coplit Z. Introducing INSPIRE, a scholarly component in undergraduate medical education. Mount Sinai J Med 2009; 76: 387–391
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahle L, Brynhilsden J, Behrbohm F, Aallsberg M, Rundquist J, Hammar M. Pros and cons of vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science with a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum; examples and experiences from Linkoping, Sweden. Med Teach 2002; 24: 280–285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis M, Harden R. AMEE Medical Education Guide No 15. Problem-based learning: A practical guide. Med Teach 1999; 21: 130–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGrave W, Dolmas D, Van DER Vleuten C. Student perceptions about the occurrence of critical incidents in tutorial groups. Med Teach 2001; 23: 49–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diaz-Torres Y, Leyva-Gonzalez F, Valencia-Sanchez J, Lopez-Samano V, Felix-Espinoza F. Developing critical skills to analyse research reports in nuclear medicine. Gaceta médica de México 2009; 145: 103–107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donald A, Greenhalgh T. A hands-on guide to evidence based health care: Practice and implementation. Blackwell Science, Oxford 2000
   Google Scholar
• Dowell J, Merrylees N. Electives: Isn’t it time for a change?. Med Educ 2009; 43: 121–126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drennan L. Quality assessment and the tension between teaching and research. Quality High Educ 2001; 7(3)167–178
   Google Scholar
• Driessen E, Tartwijk J, Overeem K, Vermunt J, Van Der Vleuten C. Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ 2005; 39: 1230–1235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans I, Thornton H, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, 2011. Testing treatments: Better research for better healthcare. 2nd Ed. London. Pinter & Martin Ltd. pp 57
   Google Scholar
• Fishleder A, Henson L, Hull A. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine: An innovative approach to medical education and the training of physician investigators. Acad Med 2007; 82(4)390–396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Medical Council, GMC. Tomorrow's doctors. GMC, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• General Medical Council, GMC. Tomorrow's doctors: Outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. GMC, London 2009
   Google Scholar
• Gibbon JH. The inquiring mind. Ann Surg 1949; 130(1)137–139
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldstein J, Brown M. The clinical investigator: Bewitched, bothered, and bewildered – but still beloved. J Clin Invest 1997; 99(12): 2803–2812
   Google Scholar
• Green D, Borkan J, Pross J, Adler S, Nothnagle M, Parsonnet J, Gruppuso P. Encouraging scholarship: Medical school programs to promote student inquiry beyond the traditional medical curriculum. Acad Med 2010; 85: 409–418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin M, Hindocha S. Publication practices of medical students at British medical schools: Experience, attitudes and barriers to publish. Med Teach 2011; 33: e1–e8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith C, Wilson J, Langer S, Haist S. House Staff nonverbal communication skills and standardized patient satisfaction. J Gen Internal Med 2003; 18: 170–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grochowski COC, Halperin E, Buckley E. A curricular model for the training of physician scientists: The evolution of the Duke University School of Medicine curriculum. Acad Med 2007; 82(4)375–382
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harden R, Sowden S, Dunn W. ASME Medical Education Booklet 18: Some educational strategies in curriculum development; The SPICES model. Med Educ 1984; 18: 284–297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay D. Medical literature appraisal. Curr Obstetrics Gynaecol 2004; 14: 434–437
   Google Scholar
• Healey M. Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. J Geograph High Educ 2005a; 29: 183–201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey M. Linking research and teaching: Exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching, R Barnett. McGraw Hill/Open University Press, Maidenhead 2005b; 67–78
   Google Scholar
• Healey M. Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning: Research context, developments and future directions. J Geograph High Educ 2008; 32: 163–166
   Google Scholar
• Hendry G, Ryan G, Harris J. Group problems in problem-based learning. Med Teach 2003; 25: 609–616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchcock M, Anderson A. Dealing with dysfunctional tutorial groups. Teach Learn Med 1997; 9: 19–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway R, Nesbit K, Bordley D, Noyes K. Teaching and evaluating first and second year medical students' practice of evidence-based medicine. Med Educ 2004; 38: 868–878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilic D. Assessing competency in evidence-based practice: Strengths and limitations of current tools in practice. BMC Med Educ 2009; 9: 53–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones A. Generic attributes as espoused theory: The importance of context. High Educ 2009; 58: 175–191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junge B, Quinones C, Kakietek J, Teodorescu D, Marstellar P. Promoting undergraduate interest, preparedness and professional pursuit in the sciences: An outcomes evaluation of the SURE program at Emory university. CBE-Life Sci Educ 2010; 9: 119–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessel F, Rosenfield P. Toward transdisciplinary research: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Am J Preventative Med 2008; 35(2S)S225–S234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koops W, Van Der Vleuten C, Leng BD, Oei S, Snoeckx L. Computer-supported collaborative learning in the medical workplace: Students' experiences on formative peer feedback of a critical appraisal of a topic paper. Med Teach 2011; 33(6)e318–e323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laidlaw A, Guild S, Struthers J. Graduate attributes in the disciplines of Medicine, Dentistry and Veterinary Medicine: A survey of expert opinions. BMC Med Educ 2009; 9: 28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambe P, Bristow D. What are the most important non-academic attributes of good doctors? A Delphi survey of clinicians. Med Teach 2010; 32: e347–e354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y-L, Mann K, Frank B. What drives students’ self-directed learning in a hybrid PBL curriculum?. Adv Health Sci Educ 2010; 15: 425–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard M, Graham S, Bonacum D. The human factor: The critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Quality Safety Health Care 2004; 13: i85–i90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine R, Lin F, Kern D, Wright S, Carrese J. Stories from early-career women physicians who have left academic medicine: A qualitative study at a single institution. Acad Med 2011; 86(6)752–758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liabsuetrakul T, Suntharasaj T, Tangtrakulwanich B, Uakritdathikarn T, Pornsawat P. Longitudinal analysis of integrating evidence-based medicine into a medical student curriculum. Int Family Med 2009; 41: 585–588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDougall M, Riley S. Initiating undergraduate medical students into communities of research practise: What do supervisors recommend?. BMC Med Educ 2010; 10: 83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDougall M, Riley S, Cameron H, McKinstry B. Halos and horns in the assessment of undergraduate medical students: A consistency-based approach. J Appl Quantitative Meth 2008; 3(2)116–128
   Google Scholar
• Malik A, Malik R. Twelve tips for developing an integrated curriculum. Med Teach 2011; 33: 99–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marusic A, Marusic M. Teaching students how to read and write science: A mandatory course on scientific research and communication in medicine. Acad Med 2003; 78: 1235–1239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maudsley G, Strivens J. Promoting professional knowledge, experiential learning and critical thinking for medical students. Med Educ 2000; 34: 535–544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meats E, Heneghan C, Crilly M, Glasziou P. Evidence-based medicine teaching in UK medical schools. Med Teach 2009; 31: 332–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar E, Baker M, Howden-Chapman P, Wilson N, Dickson N. Involving students in real-world research: A pilot study for teaching public health and research skills. BMC Med Educ 2009; 9: 45–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mirabel O, Epstein M, Richards-Kortum R. Engaging undergraduates to solve global health challenges: A new approach based on bioengineering design. Ann Biomed Eng 2010; 38: 3031–3041
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murdoch-Eaton D, Drewery S, Elton S, Emmerson C, Marshall M, Smith J, Stark P, Whittle S. What Do Medical Students Understand By Research And Research Skills?. Med Teach 2010; 32: e152–e160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandi P, Chan J, Chan C, Chan P, Chan L. Undergraduate medical education: Comparison of problem-based learning and conventional learning. Hong Kong Med J 2000; 6: 301–306
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson F, Ferguson E, Thomas S. Using job analysis to identify core and specific competencies: Implications for selection and recruitment. Med Educ 2008; 42: 1195–1204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price P, Lewis E, Loughmiller G, Nelson D, Murray S, Taylor C. Attributes of a good practicing physician. J Med Educ 1971; 46: 229–237
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Putnam C. Reform and innovation: Medical education in the 20th century USA. Orvostorteneti kozlemenyek 2006; 51(3-4)23–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rabinowitz D, Reis S, Raalte Rv, Alroy G. Development of a physician attributes database as a resource for medical education, professionalism and student evaluation. Med Teach 2004; 26(2)160–165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rademaker J, Rooy N, Cate O. Senior medical students' appraisal of CanMEDS competencies. Med Educ 2007; 41: 990–994
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reitmanova S. Knowledge translation in health research: A novel approach to health sciences education. Med Educ Online 2009; 14: 10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riley S, Gibbs T, Ferrell W, Nelson P, Smith W, Murphy M. Getting the most out of student selected components: 12 tips for participating students. Med Teach 2009; 31: 896–902
   Google Scholar
• Robinson L, Drewery S, Ellershaw J, Smith J, Whittle S, Murdoch-Eaton D. Research governance: Impeding both research and teaching? A survey of impact on undergradaute research opportunities. Med Educ 2007; 41: 729–736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg W, Donald A. Evidence based medicine: An approach to clinical problem-solving. British Med J 1995; 310(6987)1122–1126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett D, Rosenberg W, Gray JM, Haynes R, Richardson W. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Med J 1996; 312: 71–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt H, Rotgans J, Yew E. The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Med Educ 2011; 45: 792–806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehiralti M, Akpinar A, Ersoy N. Attributes of a good physician: What are the opinions of first-year medical students?. J Med Ethics 2010; 36: 121–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selborne E, 1997. Report of the committee of enquiry into veterinary research
   Google Scholar
• Shankar P, Chandrasekar T, Misha T, Subish P. Initiating and strengthening medical students research: Time to take up the gauntlet. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2006; 4: 135–138
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaw M, Green D. Benchamarking the PhD – A tentative begining. Quality Assurance Educ 2002; 10(2)116–124
   Google Scholar
• Smits P, Verbeek J, Buisonje CD. Problem-based learning in continuing medical education: A review of controlled evaluation studies. British Med J 2002; 324: 153–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer J, Jordan R. Learner-centred approaches in medical education. British Med J 1999; 318: 1280–1283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart M, Brown J, Donner A, McWhinney I, Oates J, Weston W, Jordan J. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Family Prac 2000; 49(9)796–804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom P, Strom R, Moore E. Peer and self-evaluation of teamwork skills. J Adolescence 1999; 22(4)539–553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Struthers J, Laidlaw A, Aiton J, Humphris G, Guild S, 2008. Research teaching linkages: Enhancing graduate attributes: Disciplines of medicine, dentistry and veterinary medicine. QAA Scotland
   Google Scholar
• Sung N, Crowley W, Genel M, Salber P, Sandy L, Sherwood L, Johnson S, Catanese V, Tilson H, Getz K, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. J Am Med Assoc 2003; 289(10)1278–1287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taheri H, Mirmohamadsadeghi M, Adibi I, Ashorion V. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) for undergraduate medical students. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008; 37: 764–768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarnvik A. Revival of the case method: A way to retain student-centred learning in a post-PBL era. Med Teach 2007; 29: e32–e36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tartwijk J, Driessen E. Portfolios for assessment and learning, AMEE Guide no 45. Med Teach 2009; 31(9)790–801
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor D, Miflin B. Problem-based Learning: Where are we now? AMEE Guide 36. Med Teach 2008; 30(8)742–763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watmough S, O'sullivan H, Taylor D. Graduates from a traditional medical curriculum evaluate the effectiveness of their medical curriculum through interviews. BMC Med Educ 2009; 9: 64–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watmough S, O'sullivan H, Taylor D. Graduates from a reformed undergraduate medical curriculum based on Tomorrow's Doctors evaluate the effectiveness of their curriculum 6 years after graduation through interviews. BMC Med Educ 2010; 10: 65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams S, Weinman J, Dale J. Doctor-patient communication and patient satisfaction: A review. Family Prac 1998; 15(5)480–492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Federation for Medical Education, WFME, 2007. Global standards for quality improvement in medical education. Available from www.wfme.org
   Google Scholar
• Zemlo T, Garrison H, Partridge N, Ley T. The physician-scientist; career issues and challenges at the year 2000. FASEB J 2000; 14: 221–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar