Academic dishonesty and ethical reasoning: Pharmacy and medical school students in New Zealand

References

• Aggarwal R, Bates I, Davies JG, Khan I. A study of academic dishonesty among students at two pharmacy schools. Pharm J 2002; 269(7219)529–533
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Org Behav Human Decision Process 1991; 50(2)179–211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson RE, Obenshain SS. Cheating by students: Findings, reflections, and remedies. Acad Med 1994; 69(5)323–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu TA, Joseph NM, Sharmila V. Academic dishonesty among undergraduates from private medical schools in India. Are we on the right track?. Med Teach 2011; 33(9)1–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker MD, Jr, Maner JK. Male risk-taking as a context-sensitive signaling device. J Exp Soc Psych 2009; 45(5)1136–1139
   Google Scholar
• Bates I, Davies J, Murphy C, Bone A. A multi-faculty exploration of academic dishonesty. Pharm Educ 2005; 5(1)69–76
   Google Scholar
• Bilic-Zulle L, Frkoviæ V, Turk T, Azman J, Petroveèki M. Prevalence of plagiarism among medical students. Croatian Med J 2005; 46(1)126–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caravello PS. The literature on academic integrity and graduate students: Issues, Solutions, and the Case for a Librarian Role. Public Serv Q 2008; 3(3 & 4)141–171
   Google Scholar
• Coverdale J, Henning MA. Cheating by medical students, Royal Australian and New Zealand conference of psychiatrists. Hamilton, New Zealand 1998
   Google Scholar
• Cushman F, Young L, Hauser M. The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment. Psychol Sci 2006; 17(12)1082–1089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercegovac Z, Richardson JV. Academic dishonesty, plagiarism included, in the digital age: A literature review. College Res Lib 2004; 65(4)301–318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field AP. Discovering statistics using SPSS: And sex, drugs and rock’n’roll2nd. SAGE, London 2005
   Google Scholar
• Granitz N, Loewy D. Applying ethical theories: Interpreting and responding to student plagiarism. J Bus Ethics 2007; 72(3)293–306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Maxfield S, Shapiro M, Hass S. 2009. Risky business: Busting the myth of women as risk averse, Linking gender and organizational effectiveness, vol. Briefing note number 28. Boston, MA: Center for Gender in Organizations, School of Management, Simmons College.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie CL. 2009. Plagiarism and cheating: A mixed methods study of student academic dishonesty, unpublished Master of Social Sciences, The University of Waikato.
   Google Scholar
• Hardigan PC. First- and third-year pharmacy students' attitudes toward cheating behaviors. Am J Pharm Educ 2004; 68(5)BK1–BK5
   Google Scholar
• Harries R, Rutter P. Cheating by pharmacy students: Perceptions, prevalence and comparisons. Pharm Educ 2005; 5(1)53–60
   Google Scholar
• Hauser M, Cushman F, Young L, Jin RK-X, Mikhail J. A dissociation between moral judgments and justifications. Mind Lang 2007; 22(1)1–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe A, Crofts D, Billingham K. Can nurses teach tomorrow s doctors? A nursing perspective on involvement in community-based medical education. Med Teach 2000; 22(6)576–584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Livingston BA. Is the gap more than gender? A longitudinal analysis of gender, gender role orientation, and earnings. J Appl Psychol 2008; 93(5)994–1012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurdi R, Hage HS, Chow HPH. Academic dishonesty in the Canadian classroom: Behaviours of a sample of university students. Can J Higher Educ 2011; 41(3)1–35
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg L. The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. J Phil 1973; 70(18)630–646
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg L. The cognitive-developmental approach to moral education. Phi Delta Kappan 1975; 56(10)670–677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latif DA. The link between moral reasoning scores, social desirability, and patient care performance scores: Empirical evidence from the retail pharmacy setting. J Bus Ethics 2000; 25(3)255–269
   Google Scholar
• Latif DA. Moral reasoning and its implications for pharmacy education. Pharm Educ 2003; 3(1)1–6
   Google Scholar
• Latif DA. An assessment of the ethical reasoning of United States pharmacy students: A national study. Am J Pharm Educ 2004; 68(2), [Electronic article]. Retrieved October 28, 2012, from http://www.ajpe.org/doi/pdf/10.5688/aj680230
   Google Scholar
• Li A, Bagger J. The balanced inventory of desirable responding (BIDR). Educ Psychol Meas 2007; 67(3)525–544
   Google Scholar
• Marshall SJ, Garry M. 2005. How well do students really understand plagiarism? ASCILITE (2005) conference, Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved October 28, 2012 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane05/blogs/proceedings/52_Marshall.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Muhney KA, Gutmann ME, Schneiderman E, DeWald JP, McCann A, Campbell PR. The prevalence of academic dishonesty in Texas dental hygiene programs. J Dental Educ 2008; 72(11)1247–1260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng HWW, Davies G, Bates I, Avellone M. Academic dishonesty among pharmacy students. Pharm Educ 2003; 3(4)261–269
   Google Scholar
• Papadakis MA, Hodgson CS, Teherani A, Kohatsu ND. Unprofessional behavior in medical school is associated with subsequent disciplinary action by a state medical board. Acad Med 2004; 79(3)244–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus DL. Measurement and control of response bias. Measures of personality and social psychology attitudes, JP Robinson, PR Shaver, LS Wrightsman. Academic Press, New York 1991; 17–59
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich PR, Zusho A. Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. Scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective, RP Perry, JC Smart. Springer, DordrechtThe Netherlands 2007; 731–810
   Google Scholar
• Rabi SM, Patton LR, Fjortoft N, Zgarrick DP. Characteristics, prevalence, attitudes, and perceptions of academic dishonesty among pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ 2006; 70(4)1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie S, Rudland J. Differences in medical students’ attitudes to academic misconduct and reported behaviour across the years: A questionnaire study. J Med Ethics 2003; 29(2)97–102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan G, Bonanno H, Krass I, Scouller K, Smith L. Undergraduate and postgraduate pharmacy students' perceptions of plagiarism and academic honesty. Am J Pharm Educ 2009; 73(6), [Electronic article]. Retrieved October 28, 2012, from http://www.ajpe.org/doi/pdf/10.5688/aj7306105
   Google Scholar
• Simkin MG, McLeod A. Why do college students cheat?. J Bus Ethics 2010; 94: 1–13
   Google Scholar
• The University of Auckland. 2010. Procedures and penalties for academic dishonesty. Retrieved October 28, 2012, from http://www.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/home/about/teaching-learning/honesty/tl-procedures-and-penalties
   Google Scholar
• Tsai T-C, Harasym P, Coderre S, McLaughlin K, Donnon T. Assessing ethical problem solving by reasoning rather than decision making. Med Educ 2009; 43(12)1188–1197
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Underwood JDM. Student attitudes towards socially acceptable and unacceptable group working practices. Br J Psychol 2003; 94(3)319–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley HP, Starr J. Academic dishonesty among pharmacy students: Does portable technology play a role?. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 2010; 2(2)94–99
   Google Scholar
• Wiggleton C, Petrusa E, Loomis K, Tarpley J, Tarpley M, O’Gorman ML, Miller B. Medical students' experiences of moral distress: Development of a web-based survey. Acad Med 2010; 85(1)111–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar