A critical examination of the time and workload involved in the design and delivery of an e-module in postgraduate clinical education

References

• Alexander S. E-learning developments and experiences. Educ Train 2001; 43(4/5)240–248
   Google Scholar
• Baumfield V, Hall E, Higgins S, Wall K. Forming a community of inquiry: The practice of questioning in a school/university collaborative environment. AERA School/Univeristy Research Collaboration SIG, New York, NY 2008
   Google Scholar
• Beetham H, Sharpe R. Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. Routledge, London 2010
   Google Scholar
• Brogden L, Couros A. Contemplating the virtual campus: Pedagogical and administrative considerations. Delta Kappa Gamma Bull 2002; 68: 22–30
   Google Scholar
• Carlock P, Hamrick B, Johnson C, Martell K, Schroder I. 2001. Final report: Faculty workload issues. [Online; Accessed 10 November 2011] Available from http://www.siue.edu/TLTR/GrpA4.htm
   Google Scholar
• Christenberry JR, Sturgeon J. 1996. Project and employee time tracking for information systems and technology. College and University Information Services Conference, Nov 14, 1996 Atlanta, Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Cook DA. The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it. Med Teach 2009; 31: 158–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions. J Am Med Assoc 2008; 300(10)1181–1196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crotty M. The foundations of social science. Sage, London 2005
   Google Scholar
• Curtis MP. 2001. Incentives and obstacles for nursing faculty in choosing to teach via distance. PhD diss., Saint Louis University.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett R, Maclean D. 2004. Transnational delivery by UK higher education, Part 2: Innovation and competitive advantage (briefing note 19). Observatory on borderless higher education.
   Google Scholar
• Hara N, Kling R. Student distress in web-based distance education. Educause Quart 2001; 24(3)68–69
   Google Scholar
• Howell SL, Williams PB, Lindsay NK. Thirty-two trends affecting distance education: An informed foundation for strategic planning. [Accessed 30 October 2012] Available from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall63/howell63.html 2003
   Google Scholar
• Jewett F. The new economics of college teaching and learning: A framework for the comparative analysis of the costs of classroom instruction vis-à-vis distributed instruction. Dollars, distance and online education, MJ Finklestein, C Frances, J FI, B Scholz. Oryx Press, Phoenix 2000; 85–122
   Google Scholar
• Johnson J, Posey L, Simmens SJ. Faculty and student perceptions of web-based learning. Am J Nurse Pract 2005; 9: 9–18
   Google Scholar
• Khan K, Coomarasamy A. A hierarchy of effective teaching and learning to acquire competence in evidenced-based medicine. BMC Med Educ 2006; 6(1)59–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lam-Antoniades M, Ratnapalan S, Tait G. Electronic continuing education in the health professions: An update on evidence from RCTs. J Contin Educ Health Professions 2009; 29: 44–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurillard D. Modelling benefits-oriented costs for technology enhanced learning. Higher Educ 2007; 54: 21–39
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard D. The teacher as action researcher: Using technology to capture pedagogic form. Stud Higher Educ 2008; 33: 139–154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major CH. Do virtual professors dream of electric students? University faculty experiences with online distance education. Teach College Rec 2010; 112: 2154–2208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancuso JM. Perceptions of distance education among nursing faculty members in North America. Nurs Health Sci 2009; 11: 194–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Nunes J. Critical issues for e-learning delivery: What may seem obvious is not always put into practice. J Comp Assist Learn 2008; 24: 433–445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Education Association (NEA). 2000. A survey of traditional and distance learning higher education members. [Online; Accessed 10 October 2011] Available from http://www.nea.org/he/aboputthe/dlstudy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill K, Singh G, O’Donoghue J. Implementing e-learning programmes for higher education: A review of the literature. J Informat Techonol Educ 2004; 3: 313–323
   Google Scholar
• Petrides L. Web-based technologies for distributed (or distance) learning: Creating learning-centred educational experiences in the higher education classroom. Int J Instuct Media 2002; 29(1)69–77
   Google Scholar
• Pirani, J. 2004. Supporting e-learning in higher education [Online; Accessed May 2011]. Boulder, Colorado: EDUCAUSE Center for applied research. Available from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERS0303/ecm0303.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, B. (ed.) 2001. Innovation in open and distance learning: Successful development of online and web-based learning, London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers P, McEwan M, Pond, S. The use of web analytics in the design and evaluation of distance education. Emerging technologies in distance education, G Veletsianos. Athabaska University Press, Athabaska 2010; 231–247
   Google Scholar
• Rumble, G. E-education – Whose benefits, whose costs? Inaugural Lecture, 28 February 2001, Open University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan M, Carlton KH, Ali NS. Reflections on the role of faculty in distance learning and changing pedagogies. Nurs Educ Perspect 2004; 25: 73–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan M, Hodson-Carlton K, Ali NS. A model for faculty teaching online: Confirmation of a dimensional matrix. J Nurs Educ 2005; 44: 357–365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidtlein FA, Taylor AL. Identifying costs of instructional technology in higher education. Tertiary Educ Manage 2000; 6: 289–304
   Google Scholar
• Schofield K, Walsh A, Melville B. 2003. Online learning and the new VET practitioner. [Online; Accessed July 2011] Available from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED454439.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder A, Minocha S, Schneider C. The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning. J Comp Assist Learn 2010; 26: 159–174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonderwell S. An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. Internet Higher Educ 2003; 6(1)77–90
   Google Scholar
• Web Analytics Association. 2010. The official WAA definition of web analytics. [Online; Accessed 4 May 2011] Available from http://www.webanalyticsassociation.org/?page+aboutus
   Google Scholar
• Wutoh R, Boren SA, Balas EA. eLearning: A review of internet-based continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Professions 2004; 24: 20–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar