5,889
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Twelve Tips

Twelve tips for making the best use of feedback

&
Pages 348-351 | Published online: 27 Feb 2013

References

  • Arah OA, Hoekstra JB, Bos AP, Lombarts KM. New tools for systematic evaluation of teaching qualities of medical faculty: Results of an ongoing multi-center survey. PLoS One 2011; 6(10)e25983, available from: PM:22022486
  • Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Med Educ 2010; 44(1)101–108, available from: PM:20078761
  • Bangert-Drowns RL, Kulik CLC, Kulik JA, Morgan M. The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Rev Educ Res 1991; 61(2)213–238
  • Becker JL, Milad MP, Klock SC. Burnout, depression, and career satisfaction: Cross-sectional study of obstetrics and gynecology residents. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195(5)1444–1449, available from: PM:17074551
  • Beckman TJ, Ghosh AK, Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Mandrekar JN. How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19(9)971–977, available from: PM:15333063
  • Boerebach BC, Arah OA, Busch OR, Lombarts KM. Reliable and valid tools for measuring surgeons' teaching performance: Residents' vs. self evaluation. J Surg Educ 2012; 69(4)511–520, available from: PM:22677591
  • Colthart I, Bagnall G, Evans A, Allbutt H, Haig A, Illing J, McKinstry B. The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10. Med Teach 2008; 30(2)124–145, available from: PM:18464136
  • Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: A systematic review. JAMA 2006; 296(9)1094–1102, available from: PM:16954489
  • Durning SJ, Artino A, Boulet J, La Rochelle J, van der Vleuten C, Arze B, Schuwirth L. The feasibility, reliability, and validity of a post-encounter form for evaluating clinical reasoning. Med Teach 2012; 34(1)30–37, available from: PM:22250673
  • Epstein RM, Siegel DJ, Silberman J. Self-monitoring in clinical practice: A challenge for medical educators. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008; 28(1)5–13, available from: PM:18366128
  • Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004; 79(10 Suppl.)S70–S81, available from: PM:15383395
  • Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, Sargeant J. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: On the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012; 17(1)15–26, available from: PM:21468778
  • Eva KW, Regehr G. Knowing when to look it up: A new conception of self-assessment ability. Acad Med 2007; 82(10 Suppl.)S81–S84, available from: PM:17895699
  • Eva KW, Regehr G. “I'll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self-assessment. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008; 28(1)14–19, available from: PM:18366120
  • Grand'Maison P, Lescop J, Rainsberry P, Brailovsky CA. Large-scale use of an objective, structured clinical examination for licensing family physicians. CMAJ 1992; 146(10)1735–1740, available from: PM:1596809
  • Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996; 119(2)254–284
  • Krackov SK, Pohl H. Building expertise using the deliberate practice curriculum-planning model. Med Teach 2011; 33(7)570–575, available from: PM:21696284
  • Lockyer J, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Loney E, Mann K, Sargeant J. Feedback data sources that inform physician self-assessment. Med Teach 2011; 33(2)e113–e120, available from: PM:21275533
  • Lombarts MJ, Arah OA, Busch OR, Heineman MJ. Using the SETQ system to evaluate and improve teaching qualities of clinical teachers. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2010; 154: A1222, available from: PM:20170574
  • Lombarts KM, Bucx MJ, Arah OA. Development of a system for the evaluation of the teaching qualities of anesthesiology faculty. Anesthesiology 2009; 111(4)709–716, available from: PM:19707115
  • Madewell JE. Lifelong learning and the maintenance of certification. J Am Coll Radiol 2004; 1(3)199–203, available from: PM:17411559
  • Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Eva K, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Sargeant J. Tensions in informed self-assessment: How the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Acad Med 2011; 86(9)1120–1127, available from: PM:21785309
  • Medical Professionalism Project. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: A physicians' charter. Lancet 2002; 359(9305)520–522
  • Nicol D, Macfarlane-Dick D. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud Higher Educ 2006; 31: 199–218
  • Overeem K, Lombarts MJ, Arah OA, Klazinga NS, Grol RP, Wollersheim HC. Three methods of multi-source feedback compared: A plea for narrative comments and coworkers' perspectives. Med Teach 2010; 32(2)141–147, available from: PM:20163230
  • Overeem K, Wollersheim HC, Arah OA, Cruijsberg JK, Grol RP, Lombarts KM. Evaluation of physicians' professional performance: An iterative development and validation study of multisource feedback instruments. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12: 80, available from: PM:22448816
  • Petrusa ER, Blackwell TA, Ainsworth MA. Reliability and validity of an objective structured clinical examination for assessing the clinical performance of residents. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150(3)573–577, available from: PM:2310275
  • Ramani S, Krackov SK. Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment. Med Teach 2012; 34(10)787–91
  • Sargeant J, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Eva K, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, van der Vleuten C. The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: A conceptual model. Acad Med 2010; 85(7)1212–1220, available from: PM:20375832
  • Sargeant J, Eva KW, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Lockyer JM, Loney E, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CP. Features of assessment learners use to make informed self-assessments of clinical performance. Med Educ 2011a; 45(6)636–647, available from: PM:21564201
  • Sargeant J, Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. “Directed” self-assessment: Practice and feedback within a social context. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008; 28(1)47–54, available from: PM:18366127
  • Sargeant J, McNaughton E, Mercer S, Murphy D, Sullivan P, Bruce DA. Providing feedback: Exploring a model (emotion, content, outcomes) for facilitating multisource feedback. Med Teach 2011b; 33(9)744–749, available from: PM:21854151
  • Sargeant JM, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CP, Metsemakers JF. Reflection: A link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009; 14(3)399–410, available from: PM:18528777
  • Sloan DA, Donnelly MB, Schwartz RW, Strodel WE. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination. The new gold standard for evaluating postgraduate clinical performance. Ann Surg 1995; 222(6)735–742, available from: PM:8526580
  • van der Leeuw R, Lombarts K, Heineman MJ, Arah O. Systematic evaluation of the teaching qualities of Obstetrics and Gynecology faculty: Reliability and validity of the SETQ tools. PLoS One 2011; 6(5)e19142, available from: PM:21559275
  • van Es JM, Visser MR, Wieringa-de Waard M. Do GP trainers use feedback in drawing up their Personal Development Plans (PDPs)? Results from a quantitative study. Med Teach 2012; 34(11)e718–24
  • Wenger E. Communities of practice – Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998
  • Yardley S, Teunissen PW, Dornan T. Experiential learning: AMEE Guide No. 63. Med Teach 2012; 34(2)e102–e115, available from: PM:22289008

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.