Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87

References

• American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA) & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). 1999. Standards for education and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association
   Google Scholar
• Artino AR, Gehlbach H, Durning SJ. 2011. AM last page: Avoiding five common pitfalls of survey design. Acad Med 86:1327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Artino AR, Gehlbach H. 2012. AM last page: Avoiding four visual-design pitfalls in survey development. Acad Med 87:1452
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beck CT, Gable RK. 2001. Ensuring content validity: An illustration of the process. J Nurs Meas 9:201–215
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christian LM, Parsons NL, Dillman DA. 2009. Designing scalar questions for web surveys. Sociol Method Res 37:393–425
   Google Scholar
• Colliver JA, Conlee MJ, Verhulst SJ, Dorsey JK. 2010. Reports of the decline of empathy during medical education are greatly exaggerated: A reexamination of the research. Acad Med 85:588–593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Beckman TJ. 2006. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. Am J Med 119:166.e7–166.e16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeVellis RF. 2003. Scale development: Theory and applications. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Dillman D, Smyth J, Christian L. 2009. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
   Google Scholar
• Drennan J. 2003. Cognitive interviewing: Verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires. J Adv Nurs 42(1):57–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT. 2012. Exploratory factor analysis. New York: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Fowler FJ. 2009. Survey research methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Gehlbach H, Artino AR, Durning S. 2010. AM last page: Survey development guidance for medical education researchers. Acad Med 85:925
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gehlbach H, Brinkworth ME. 2011. Measure twice, cut down error: A process for enhancing the validity of survey scales. Rev Gen Psychol 15:380–387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane MT. 2006. Validation in educational measurement. 4th ed. Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger
   Google Scholar
• Karabenick SA, Woolley ME, Friedel JM, Ammon BV, Blazevski J, Bonney CR, De Groot E, Gilbert MC, Musu L, Kempler TM, Kelly KL. 2007. Cognitive processing of self-report items in educational research: Do they think what we mean? Educ Psychol 42(3):139–151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick JA. 1999. Survey research. Annu Rev Psychol 50:537–567
   Google Scholar
• Magee C, Byars L, Rickards G, Artino AR. 2013. Tracing the steps of survey design: A graduate medical education research example. J Grad Med Educ 5(1):1–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCoach DB, Gable RK, Madura JP. 2013. Instrument development in the affective domain: School and corporate applications. 3rd ed. New York: Springer
   Google Scholar
• McIver JP, Carmines EG. 1981. Unidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie JF, Wood ML, Kotecki JE, Clark JK, Brey RA. 1999. Establishing content validity: Using qualitative and quantitative steps. Am J Health Behav 23(4):311–318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoles-Springer AM, Olsson-Santoyo J, O’Brien H, Stewart AL. 2006. Using cognitive interviews to develop surveys in diverse populations. Med Care 44(11):s21–s30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. 2003. Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. 2004. Nursing research: Principles and methods. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. 2006. The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 29:489–497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickards G, Magee C, Artino AR. 2012. You can’t fix by analysis what you’ve spoiled by design: developing survey instruments and collecting validity evidence. J Grad Med Educ 4(4):407–410
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee ES, Rauch S. 2003. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Soc Work Res 27(2):94–104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt N. 1996. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychol Assess 8:350–353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz N. 1999. Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. Am Psychol 54:93–105
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan G. 2011. A primer on the validity of assessment instruments. J Grad Med Educ 3(2):119–120
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sullivan GM, Artino AR. 2013. Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ 5(4):541–542
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski KA. 2000. The psychology of survey response. New York: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. 2005. Measurement in nursing and health research. 3rd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Co
   Google Scholar
• Watt T, Rasmussen AK, Groenvold M, Bjorner JB, Watt SH, Bonnema SJ, Hegedus L, Feldt-Rasmussen U. 2008. Improving a newly developed patient-reported outcome for thyroid patients, using cognitive interviewing. Quality of Life Research 17:1009–1017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng LJ. 2004. Impact of the number of response categories and anchor labels on coefficient alpha and test-retest reliability. Educ Psychol Meas 64:956–972
   Google Scholar
• Willis GB, Artino AR. 2013. What do our respondents think we’re asking? Using cognitive interviewing to improve medical education surveys. J Grad Med Educ 5(3):353–356
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willis GB. 2005. Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar