432
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Meeting international standards: A cultural approach in implementing the mini-CEX effectively in Indonesian clerkships

, , , &

References

  • Archer J. 2010. State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Med Educ 44:101–108
  • Bik OPG. 2010. The behavior of assurance professionals a cross-cultural perspective. PhD Thesis, University of Groningen. Delft: Eburon
  • Bleakley A, Brice J, Bligh J. 2008. Thinking the post-colonial in medical education. Med Educ 42:266–270
  • Boursicot K, Etheridge L, Setna Z, Sturrock A, Ker J, Smee S, Sambandam E. 2011. Performance in assessment: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa conference. Med Teach 33:370–383
  • Cantillon P, Sargeant J. 2008. Giving feedback in clinical settings. BMJ 337:a1961
  • Chandratilake M, McAleer S, Gibson J. 2012. Cultural similarities and differences in medical professionalism: A multi-region study. Med Educ 46:257–266
  • Cilliers FJ, Schuwirth LW, Adendorff HJ, Herman N, van der Vleuten CP. 2010. The mechanism of impact of summative assessment on medical students’ learning. Adv Health Sci Educ 15:695–715
  • Crossley J, Humphris G, Jolly B. 2002. Assessing health professionals. Med Educ 36:800–804
  • Daelmans HEM, Hoogenboom RJI, Donker AJM, Scherpbier AJJA, Stehouwer CDA, van der Vleuten CPM. 2004. Effectiveness of clinical rotations as a learning environment for achieving competences. Med Teach 26:305–312
  • Das Carlo M, Swadi H, Mpofu D. 2003. Medical student perceptions of factors affecting productivity of problem based learning tutorial groups: Does culture influence the outcome? Teach Learn Med 15(1):59–64
  • Dekker H, Schönrock-Adema J, Snoek JW, van der Molen T, Cohen-Schotanus J. 2013. Which characteristics of written feedback are perceived as stimulating students' reflective competence: An exploratory study BMC Med Educ 13(1):94
  • De Lima AA, Henquin R, Thierer J, Paulin J, Lamari S, Belcastro F, van der Vleuten CPM. 2005. A qualitative study of the impact on learning of the mini clinical evaluation exercise in postgraduate training. Med Teach 27:46–52
  • Dornan T, Boshuizen H, King N, Scherpbier A. 2007. Experience-based learning: A model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students’ workplace learning. Med Educ 41:84–91
  • Driessen EW, van Tartwijk J, Govaerts M, Teunissen P, van der Vleuten CPM. 2012. The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: A Maastricht case report. Med Teach 34:226–231
  • Ende J. 1983. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 250:777–781
  • Epstein RM. 2007. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med 356:387–396
  • Epstein RM, Hundert EM. 2002. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA 287:226–235
  • Frambach JM, Driessen EW, Chan LC, van der Vleuten CPM. 2012. Rethinking the globalization of problem-based learning: How culture challenges self-directed learning. Med Educ 46:738–747
  • Gale R, Grant J. 1997. Managing change in a medical context: Guidelines for action, AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 10. Med Teach 19:239–249
  • Gleeson F. 1997. Assessment of clinical competence using the objective structured long examination record (OSLER). Med Teach 19:7–14
  • Gwee MC. 2008. Globalization of problem-based learning (PBL): Cross-cultural implications. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 24(3 Suppl):S14–S22
  • Harden RM. 2006. International medical education and future directions: A global perspective. Acad Med 81(12 Suppl):S22–S29
  • Hattie J, Timperley H. 2007. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 77:81–112
  • Hauer KE, Holmboe ES, Kogan JR. 2011. Twelve tips for implementing tools for direct observation of medical trainees’ clinical skills during patient encounters. Med Teach 33:27–33
  • Hays R, Baravilala W. 2004. Applying global standards across national boundaries: Lessons learned from an Asia-Pacific example. Med Educ 38:582–584
  • Hill F, Kendall K. 2007. Adopting and adapting the mini-CEX as an undergraduate assessment and learning tool. Clin Teach 4:244–248
  • Hoffman KG, Donaldson JF. 2004. Contextual tensions of the clinical environment and their influence on teaching and learning. Med Educ 38:448–454
  • Hofstede G. 1986. Cultural difference in teaching and learning. Int J Intercult Relat 10:301–332
  • Hofstede G. 2001. Culture’s consequences, comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications
  • Hofstede G, de Hilal AVG, Malvezzi S, Tanure B and Vinken H. 2010. Comparing regional cultures within a country: Lessons from Brazil. J Cross-Cult Psychol 41(3):336–352
  • Holmboe ES. 2004. Faculty and the observation of trainees’ clinical skills: Problems and opportunities. Acad Med 79:16–22
  • Jippes M, Majoor GD. 2008. Influence of national culture on the adoption of integrated and problem-based curricula in Europe. Med Educ 42:279–285
  • Kilminster S, Cottrell D, Grant J, Jolly B. 2007. AMEE Guide No. 27: Effective educational and clinical supervision. Med Teach 29:2–19
  • Kogan JR, Bellini LM, Shea JA. 2003. Feasibility, reliability and validity of the Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) in a medicine core clerkship. Acad Med 78:33–35
  • Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer KE. 2009. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: A systematic review. JAMA 302:1316–1326
  • Lam TP, Lam YY. 2009. Medical education reform: The Asian experience. Acad Med 84:1313–1317
  • Larsen DP, Butler AC, Roediger HL III. 2008. Test-enhanced learning in medical education. Med Educ 42:959–966
  • Lilley PM, Harden RM. 2003. Standards and medical education. Med Teach 25:349–351
  • Mennin SP, Kalishman S. 1998. Student assessment. Acad Med 73(9 Suppl):S46–S54
  • Miller GE. 1990. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 65(9 Suppl):S63–S67
  • Nicholson S, Cook V, Naish J, Boursicot K. 2008. Feedback: Its importance in developing medical student’s clinical practice. Clin Teach 5:163–166
  • Norcini JJ. 2005. The Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX). Clin Teach 2:25–30
  • Norcini JJ. 2010. The power of feedback. Med Educ 44:16–17
  • Norcini JJ, Anderson B, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Galbraith R, Hays R, Kent A, Perrot V, Roberts T. 2011. Criteria for good assessment: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach 33:206–214
  • Norcini JJ, Burch V. 2007. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach 29:855–871
  • Pratt DD, Kelly M, Wong WSS. 1999. Chinese conception of “effective teaching” in Hongkong: Towards culturally sensitive evaluation of teaching. Int J Lifelong Educ 18(4):241–258
  • Ramani S, Leinster S. 2008. AMEE Guide no. 34: Teaching in the clinical environment. Med Teach 30:347–364
  • Roop SA, Pangaro L. 2001. Effect of clinical teaching on student performance during a medicine clerkship. Am J Med 110:205–209
  • Schuwirth LWT, Southgate L, Page GG, Paget NS, Lescop JMJ, Lew SR, Wade WB, Baron-Maldonado M. 2002. When enough is enough: A conceptual basis for fair and defensible practice performance assessment. Med Educ 36:925–930
  • Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM. 2004. Changing education, changing assessment, changing research. Med Educ 38:805–812
  • Shute VJ. 2008. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res 78:153–189
  • Smith PB, Peterson MF, Schwartz SH. 2002. Cultural values, sources of guidance, and their relevance to managerial behaviour: A 47-nation study. J Cross-Cult Psychol 33(2):188–208
  • Spencer J. 2003. Learning and teaching in the clinical environment. BMJ 326:591–594
  • Suhoyo Y, van Hell EA, Prihatiningsih TS, Kuks JBM, Cohen-Schotanus J. 2014. Exploring cultural differences in feedback processes and perceived instructiveness during clerkships: Replicating a Dutch study in Indonesia. Med Teach 36:223–229
  • Swanson DB, Norman GR, Linn RL. 1995. Performance-based assessment: Lessons from the health professions. Educ Res 24:5–11
  • Tokode OM, Dennick R. 2013. A qualitative study of foundation doctors’ experiences with mini-CEX in the UK. Int J Med Educ 4:83–92
  • Van de Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Cate OThJ. 2008. What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ 42:189–197
  • Van der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA, Dolmans DHJM, Schuwirth LWT, Verwijnen GM, Wolfhagen HAP. 2000. Clerkship assessment assessed. Med Teach 22:592–600
  • Van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. 2005. Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Med Educ 39:309–317
  • Van Hell EA, Kuks JBM, Raat AN, van Lohuizen MT, Cohen-Schotanus J. 2009. Instructiveness of feedback during clerkships: Influence of supervisor, observation and student initiative. Med Teach 31:45–50
  • Van Niekerk JP de V, Christensen L, Karle H, Lindgren S, Nystrup J. 2003. WFME global standards in medical education: Status and perspectives following the 2003 WFME World Conference. Med Educ 37:1050–1054
  • Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB. 2006. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians’ clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach 28:117–128
  • Wass V, van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R. 2004. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 357:945–949
  • Wiles CM, Dawson K, Hughes TAT, Liewelyn JG, Morris HR, Pickersgill TP, Robertson NP, Smith PEM. 2007. Clinical skills evaluation of trainees in a neurology department. Clin Med 7:365–369
  • Wong AK. 2011. Culture in medical education: Comparing a Thai and a Canadian residency programme. Med Educ 45:1209–1219
  • Wood, T. 2009. Assessment not only drives learning, it may also help learning. Med Educ 43:5–6
  • World Federation of Medical Education (WFME). 2003. Basic medical education: WFME global standards for quality improvement. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, WFME Office
  • World Federation for Medical Education (WFME). 2013. Basic medical education WFME global standards for quality improvement: The 2012 revision. Copenhagen: WFME. [Accessed 15 May 2013] Available from http://www.wfme.org/standards/bme

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.