Situational judgement tests in medical education and training: Research, theory and practice: AMEE Guide No. 100

References

• Albanese MA, Snow MH, Skochelak SE, Huggett KN, Farrell PM. 2003. Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Acad Med 78(3):313–321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson N, Lievens F, van Dam K, Born M. 2006. A construct-driven investigation of gender differences in a leadership-role assessment center. J Appl Psychol 91(3):555–566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold J, Randall R, Patterson F, Silvester J, Robertson I, Cooper C, Burnes B, Swailes S, Harris D, Axtell C, Den Hartog D. 2010. Work psychology: Understanding human behaviour in the workplace. 5th ed. England: Pearson Education Limited
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth V, Fung K, Shaw R. 2014. National University of Singapore Situational Judgment Test and Focused Skills Assessment: Analysis & Evaluation
   Google Scholar
• Bauer TN, Truxillo DM, Sanchez RJ, Craig JM, Ferrara P, Campion MA. 2001. Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the selection procedural justice scale (SPJS). Pers Psychol 54:387–419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkeland SA, Manson TM, Kisamore JL, Brannick MT, Smith MA. 2006. A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures. Int J Sel Assess 14(4):317–335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BMA. 2009. Equality and diversity in UK medical schools. London: BMA
   Google Scholar
• Campbell J, Gasser M, Oswald F. 1996. The substantive nature of job performance variability. In: Murphy KR, editor. Individual differences and behavior in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Boss. pp 258–299
   Google Scholar
• Cascio WF, Aguinis H. 2008. Staffing twenty-first-century organizations. Acad Manag Ann 2(1):133–165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catano VM, Brochu A, Lamerson CD. 2012. Assessing the reliability of situational judgment tests used in high-stakes situations. Int J Sel Assess 20(3):333–346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavendish C. 2013. The Cavendish Review: An Independent Review into Healthcare Assistants and Support Workers in the NHS and social care settings. England: Department of Health
   Google Scholar
• Chambers BA. 2002. Applicant reactions and their consequences: Review, advice, and recommendations for future research. Int J Manag Rev 4(4):317–333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan D, Schmitt N. 1997. Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. J Appl Psychol 82(1):143–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan D, Schmitt N. 2002. Situational judgment and job performance. Hum Perform 15(3):233–254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan D, Schmitt N, Sacco JM, DeShon RP. 1998. Understanding pretest and posttest reactions to cognitive ability and personality tests. J Appl Psychol 83(3):471–485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian MS, Edwards BD, Bradley JC. 2010. Situational judgment tests: Constructs assessed and a meta-analysis of their criterion-related validities. Pers Psychol 63(1):83–117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clevenger J, Pereira GM, Wiechmann D, Schmitt N, Harvey VS. 2001. Incremental validity of situational judgment tests. J Appl Psychol 86(3):410–417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crook AE, Beier ME, Cox CB, Kell HJ, Hanks AR, Motowidlo SJ. 2011. Measuring relationships between personality, knowledge, and performance using single-response situational judgment tests. Int J Sel Assess 19(4):363–373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen MJ, Sackett PR, Lievens F. 2006. Threats to the operational use of situational judgment tests in the college admission process. Int J Sel Assess 14(2):142–155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dore KL, Reiter HI, Eva KW, Krueger S, Scriven E, Siu E, Hilsden S, Thomas J, Norman GR. 2009. Extending the interview to all medical school candidates – Computer-based multiple sample evaluation of noncognitive skills (CMSENS). Acad Med 84(10):S9–S12
   Google Scholar
• Escudier M, Flaxman C, Cousans F, Woolford M, Patterson F. 2015. Pilot results from a new assessment of professionalism. Proceedings of the AMEE Conference 2015, Glasgow, UK
   Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Reiter HI, Trinh K, Wasi P, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. 2009. Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees. Med Educ 43(8):767–775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L. 2002. Factors associated with success in medical school: Systematic review of the literature. BMJ 324(April):952–957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson E, James D, O’Hehir F, Sanders A. 2003. Pilot study of the roles of personality, references, and personal statements in relation to performance over the five years of a medical degree. BMJ. 326:429–432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson E, Sanders A, O’Hehir F, James D. 2000. Predictive validity of personal statements and the role of the five-factor model of personality in relation to medical training. J Occup Organ Psychol 73(3):321–344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson E, Semper H, Yates J, Fitzgerald JE, Skatova A, James D. 2014. The “dark side” and “bright side” of personality: When too much conscientiousness and too little anxiety are detrimental with respect to the acquisition of medical knowledge and skill. PLoS One 9(2):1–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis R. 2013. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Executive Summary. England: NHS Foundation Trust
   Google Scholar
• Gaugler BB, Rosenthal DB, Thornton GC, Bentson C. 1987. Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. J Appl Psychol 72(3):493–511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilliland SW. 1993. The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Acad Manag Rev 18(4):694–734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray MJA. 1997. Evidence-based healthcare. London: Churchill Livingstone
   Google Scholar
• Hausknecht JP, Day DV, Thomas SC. 2004. Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Pers Psychol 57(3):639–683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hülsheger UR, Anderson N. 2009. Applicant perspectives in selection: Going beyond preference reactions. Int J Sel Assess 17(4):335–345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husbands A, Mathieson A, Dowell J, Cleland JA, MacKenzie R. 2014. Predictive validity of the UK clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: A prospective cohort study. BMC Med Educ 14(1):88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James D, Yates J, Nicholson S. 2010. Comparison of A level and UKCAT performance in students applying to UK medical and dental schools in 2006: Cohort study. BMJ 340:c478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerrin M, Aitkenhead A, Shaw R. 2014. Public Health Situational Judgement Test 2014: Final Report
   Google Scholar
• Kerrin M, Rowett E, Lopes S. 2015. The University of Nottingham: School of Veterinary Medicine & Science (SVMS): Situational Judgement Test Pilot & Operational Delivery 2014
   Google Scholar
• Kline P. 2000. Handbook of Psychological Testing, Vol. 12, 2nd ed. London, UK: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Koczwara A, Ashworth V. 2013. Selection and assessment. In: Lewis R, Zibarras L, editors. Work and occupational psychology: Integrating theory and practice. London: SAGE. pp 295–342
   Google Scholar
• Koczwara A, Patterson F, Zibarras L, Kerrin M, Irish B, Wilkinson M. 2012. Evaluating cognitive ability, knowledge tests and situational judgement tests for postgraduate selection. Med Educ 46(4):399–408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiter C, Axelson R. 2013. A perspective on medical school admission research and practice over the last 25 years. Teach Learn Med 25(S1):S50–S56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libbrecht N, Lievens F, Carette B, Côté S. 2014. Emotional intelligence predicts success in medical school. Emotion 14(1):64–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens F. 2013. Adjusting medical school admission: Assessing interpersonal skills using situational judgement tests. Med Educ 47:182–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens F. 2014. Diversity in medical school admission: Insights from personnel recruitment and selection. Med Educ 49(1):7–20
   Google Scholar
• Lievens F, Buyse T, Sackett PR. 2005a. The operational validity of a video-based situational judgment test for medical college admissions: Illustrating the importance of matching predictor and criterion construct domains. J Appl Psychol 90(3):442–452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens F, Buyse T, Sackett PR. 2005b. Retest effects in operational selection settings: Development and test of a framework. Pers Psychol 58(4):981–1007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens F, Buyse T, Sackett PR, Connelly BS. 2012. The effects of coaching on situational judgment tests in high-stakes selection. Int J Sel Assess 20(3):272–282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens F, Patterson F. 2011. The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection. J Appl Psychol 96(5):927–940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens F, Peeters H, Schollaert E. 2008. Situational judgment tests: A review of recent research. Pers Rev 37(4):426–441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens F, Sackett PR. 2006. Video-based versus written situational judgment tests: A comparison in terms of predictive validity. J Appl Psychol 91(5):1181–1188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens F, Sackett PR. 2007. Situational judgment tests in high-stakes settings: Issues and strategies with generating alternate forms. J Appl Psychol 92(4):1043–1055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens F, Sackett PR. 2012. The validity of interpersonal skills assessment via situational judgment tests for predicting academic success and job performance. J Appl Psychol 97(2):460–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes S, Baron H, Patterson F. 2015a. Specialty recruitment assessment results & scoring: Psychiatry CT1 entry. Report to HEE
   Google Scholar
• Lopes S, Baron H, Patterson F. 2015b. Specialty recruitment assessment results & scoring: Ophthalmology ST1 entry. Report to HEE
   Google Scholar
• Luschin-Ebengreuth M, Dimai HP, Ithaler D, Neges HM, Reibnegger G. 2015. Situational judgment test as an additional tool in a medical admission test: An observational investigation. BMC Res Notes 8(1):1–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin M, Motowidlo SJ. 2010. A single-response SJT for measuring procedural knowledge for human factors professionals. Poster Session Presented at 25th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA
   Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Costa PT. 2008. Empirical and Theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In: Boyle GJ, Matthews G, Saklofske DH, editors. SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment. London: SAGE Publications. pp 273–294
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel MA, Hartman NS, Grubb, III WL. 2003. Situational judgment tests, knowledge, behavioral tendency and validity: A meta-analysis. 18th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology Orlando
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel MA, Hartman NS, Whetzel D, Grubb III WL. 2007. Situational judgment tests, response instructions, and validity: A meta-analysis. Pers Psychol 60(1):63–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel MA, Morgeson FP, Finnegan EB, Campion MA, Braverman EP. 2001. Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: A clarification of the literature. J Appl Psychol 86(4):730–740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel MA, Nguyen NT. 2001. Situational judgment tests: A review of practice and constructs assessed. Int J Sel Assess 9(1/2):103–113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel MA, Whetzel D. 2007. Situational judgment tests. In: Whetzel DL, Wheaton GR, editors. Applied measurement: Industrial psychology in human resources management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates. pp 235–257
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel MA, Whetzel D, Schmidt FL, Maurer SD. 1994. The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 79(4):599–616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus IC, Dewberry C, Nicholson S, Dowell J. 2013. The UKCAT-12 study: Educational attainment, aptitude test performance, demographic and socio-economic contextual factors as predictors of first year outcome in a cross-sectional collaborative study of 12 UK medical schools. BMC Med 11:244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus IC, Woolf K, Dacre J. 2008. Even one star at A level could be “too little, too late” for medical student selection. BMC Med Educ 8:1–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motowidlo SJ. 2003. Handbook of psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
   Google Scholar
• Motowidlo SJ, Beier ME. 2010. Differentiating specific job knowledge from implicit trait policies in procedural knowledge measured by a situational judgment test. J Appl Psychol 95(2):321–333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motowidlo SJ, Crook AE, Kell HJ, Naemi B. 2009. Measuring procedural knowledge more simply with a single-response situational judgment test. J Bus Psychol 24(3):281–288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motowidlo SJ, Dunnette MD, Carter GW. 1990. An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. J Appl Psychol 75(6):640–647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motowidlo SJ, Hooper AC, Jackson HL. 2006. Implicit policies about relations between personality traits and behavioral effectiveness in situational judgment items. J Appl Psychol 91(4):749–761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullins M, Schmitt N. 1998. Situational judgment testing: Will the real constructs please present themselves? 13th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen NT, SBiderman MD, SMcDaniel MA. 2005. Effects of response instructions on faking a situational judgment test. Int J Sel Assess 13(4):250–260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHS. 2013. NHS Constitution. Englan: NHS
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell MS, Hartman NS, McDaniel MA, Grubb III WL, Lawrence A. 2007. Incremental validity of situational judgment tests for task and contextual job performance. Int J Sel Assess 15(1):19–29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill L, Vonsild MC, Wallstedt B, Dornan T. 2013. Admission criteria and diversity in medical school. Med Educ 47(6):557–561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald F, Schmitt N, Kim B, Ramsay LJ, Gillespie MA. 2004. Developing a biodata measure and situational judgment inventory as predictors of college student performance. J Appl Psychol 89(2):187–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks L, Guay RP. 2009. Personality, values, and motivation. Pers Individ Dif 47(7):675–684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Aitkenhead A, Edwards H, Flaxman C, Shaw R, Rosselli A. 2015a. Analysis of the situational judgement test for selection to the foundation programme 2015: Technical Report
   Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Ashworth V, Kerrin M, O’Neill P. 2013a. Situational judgement tests represent a measurement method and can be designed to minimise coaching effects. Med Educ 47(2):220–221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Ashworth V, Mehra S, Falcon H. 2012a. Could situational judgement tests be used for selection into dental foundation training? Br Dent J 213(1):23–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Ashworth V, Zibarras L, Coan P, Kerrin M, O’Neill P. 2012b. Evaluations of situational judgement tests to assess non-academic attributes in selection. Med Educ 46:850–868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Baron H, Carr V, Plint S, Lane P. 2009a. Evaluation of three short-listing methodologies for selection into postgraduate training in general practice. Med Educ 43(1):50–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Carr V, Zibarras L, Burr B, Berkin L, Plint S, Irish B, Gregory S. 2009b. New machine-marked tests for selection into core medical training: Evidence from two validation studies. Clin Med (Northfield, IL) 9(5):417–420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Ferguson E, Lane P, Farrell K, Martlew J, Wells A. 2000. A competency model for general practice: Implications for selection, training, and development. Br J Gen Pract 50(452):188–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Ferguson E, Thomas S. 2008. Using job analysis to identify core and specific competencies: Implications for selection and recruitment. Med Educ 42(12):1195–1204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Knight A, Dowell J, Nicholson S, Cousans F, Cleland JA. 2016. How effective are selection methods in medical education and training? Evidence from a systematic review. Med Educ [in press]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson F, Lievens F, Kerrin M, Munro N, Irish B. 2013b. The predictive validity of selection for entry into postgraduate training in general practice: Evidence from three longitudinal studies. Br J Gen Pract 63(616):734–741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Lievens F, Kerrin M, Zibarras L, Carette B. 2012c. Designing selection systems for medicine: The importance of balancing predictive and political validity in high-stakes selection contexts. Int J Sel Assess 20(4):486–496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Martin S. 2014. UKCAT SJT: A study to explore validation methodology and early findings
   Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Martin S, Baron H, Fung K, Flaxman C. 2014. UKCAT situational judgement test: Technical report
   Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Prescott-Clements L, Zibarras L, Edwards H, Kerrin M, Cousans F. 2015b. Recruiting for values in healthcare: A preliminary review of the evidence. Adv Heal Sci Educ 1–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Zibarras L, Carr V, Irish B, Gregory S. 2011. Evaluating candidate reactions to selection practices using organisational justice theory. Med Educ 45(3):289–297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plint S, Patterson F. 2010. Identifying critical success factors for designing selection processes into postgraduate specialty training: The case of UK general practice. Postgrad Med J 86(1016):323–327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ployhart RE, Ehrhart MG. 2003. Be careful what you ask for: Effects of response instructions on the construct validity and reliability of situational judgment tests. Int J Sel Assess 11(1):1–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ployhart RE, Weekley J, Holtz BC, Kemp C. 2003. Web-based and paper-and-pencil testing of applicants in a proctored setting: Are personality, biodata, and situational judgment tests comparable? Pers Psychol 56(3):733–752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole P, Moriarty HJ, Wearn AM, Wilkinson T, Weller JM. 2009. Medical student selection in New Zealand: Looking to the future. N Z Med J 122(1306):88–100
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prideaux D, Roberts C, Eva KW, Centeno A, McCrorie P, McManus IC, Patterson F, Powis D, Tekian A, Wilkinson D. 2011. Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach 33(3):215–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin B. 2013. Emotional intelligence: Enhancing values-based practice and compassionate care in nursing. J Adv Nurs 69(12):2717–2725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts C, Clark T, Burgess A, Frommer M, Grant M, Mossman K. 2014. The validity of a behavioural multiple-mini-interview within an assessment centre for selection into specialty training. BMC Med Educ 14:1–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts C, Togno JM. 2011. Selection into specialist training programs: An approach from general practice. Med J Aust 194(2):93–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth PL, Bobko P, Buster MA. 2013. Situational judgment tests: The influence and importance of applicant status and targeted constructs on estimates of Black-White subgroup differences. J Occup Organ Psychol 86(3):394–409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust J, Golombok S. 1999. Modern psychometrics: The science of psychological assessment, Vol. 2. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Sartania N, McClure JD, Sweeting H, Browitt A. 2014. Predictive power of UKCAT and other pre-admission measures for performance in a medical school in Glasgow: A cohort study. BMC Med Educ 14(1):116–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt FL. 1994. The future of personnel selection in the U.S. Army. In Weekley JA, Ployhart RE, editors. Personnel selection and classification. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp 333–350
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt FL, Hunter JE. 1998. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychol Bull 124(2):262–274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt N, Chan D. 1999. The status of research on applicant reactions to selection tests and its implications for managers. Int J Manag Rev 1(1):45–62
   Google Scholar
• Sharma N, Nagle YK. 2015. Development of pictorial situational judgement test of affect. Psychology 6(March):400–408
   Google Scholar
• Simon E, Walsh K, Paterson-Brown F, Cahill D. 2015. Does a high ranking mean success in the situational judgement test? Clin Teach 12(1):42–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stemig MS, Sackett PR, Lievens F. 2015. Effects of organizationally endorsed coaching on performance and validity of situational judgment tests. Int J Sel Assess 23(2):174–181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St-Sauveur C, Girouard S, Goyette V. 2014. Use of situational judgment tests in personnel selection: Are the different methods for scoring the response options equivalent? Int J Sel Assess 22(3):225–239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakeford R, Denney M-L, Ludka-Stempien K, Dacre J, McManus IC. 2015. Cross-comparison of MRCGP & MRCP(UK) in a database linkage study of 2,284 candidates taking both examinations: Assessment of validity and differential performance by ethnicity. BMC Med Educ 15(1):1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weekley J, Ployhart RE. 2005. Situational judgment: Antecedents and relationships with performance. Hum Perform 18(1):81–104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weekley J, Ployhart RE, Holtz BC. 2006. On the development of situational judgment tests: Issues in item development, scaling, and scoring. In: Weekley JA, Ployhart RE, editors. Situational judgment tests: Theory, measurement, and application. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 157–182
   Google Scholar
• Wernimont P, Campbell J. 1968. Signs, samples, and criteria. J Appl Psychol 52(5):372–376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetzel D, McDaniel MA. 2009. Situational judgment tests: An overview of current research. Hum Resour Manag Rev 19(3):188–202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetzel D, McDaniel MA, Nguyen NT. 2008. Subgroup differences in situational judgment test performance: A meta-analysis. Hum Perform 21:291–309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf K, Potts HWW, McManus IC. 2011. Ethnicity and academic performance in UK trained doctors and medical students: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 342:d901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt MRR, Pathak SB, Zibarras L. 2010. Advancing selection in an SME: Is best practice methodology applicable? Int Small Bus J 28(3):258–273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar