Twelve tips for getting your manuscript published

References

• Azer SA, Dupras DM, Azer S. 2014. Writing for publication in medical education in high impact journals. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 18:2966–2981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman TJ, Cook DA. 2007. Developing scholarly projects in education: A primer for medical teachers. Med Teach 29:210–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boice R. 1989. Procrastination, busyness and bingeing. Behav Res Ther 27:605–611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordage G. 1989. Considerations on preparing a paper for publication. Teach Learn Med 1:47–52
   Google Scholar
• Bordage G. 2001. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Acad Med 76:889–896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordage G. 2009. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ 43:312–319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordage G, Dawson B. 2003. Experimental study design and grant writing in eight steps and 28 questions. Med Educ 37:376–385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordage G, McGaghie WC, Cook DA. 2015. Title, authors, and abstract. In: Durning SJ, Carline JD, editors. Review criteria for research manuscripts. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges. pp 148–156
   Google Scholar
• Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HCW. 2003. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. Ann Intern Med 138:40–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P, for the CONSORT Group. 2008. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 148:295–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter CR, Cone DC, Sarli CC. 2014. Using Publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact. Acad Emerg Med 21:1160–1172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke M, Alderson P, Chalmers I. 2002. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals. JAMA 287:2799–2801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. 2007. Abstracts and titles of research reports in medical education omit essential information: A systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 22(suppl 1):78
   Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Thompson WG, Thomas KG. 2014. Test-enhanced web-based learning: Optimizing the number of questions (a Randomized Crossover Trial). Acad Med 89:169–175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coverdale JH, Roberts LW, Balon R, Beresin EV. 2013. Writing for academia: Getting your research into print: AMEE Guide No. 74. Med Teach 35:e926–e934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docherty M, Smith R. 1999. The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers. BMJ 318:1224–1225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW. 2009. The reviewer is always right: Peer review of research in medical education. Med Educ 43:2–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske DW, Fogg LF. 1990. But the reviewers are making different criticisms of my paper! Diversity and uniqueness in reviewer comments. Am Psychol 45:591–598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassick CE. 2000. Boyer's expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Acad Med 75:877–880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopen GD, Swan JA. 1990. The science of scientific writing. Am Sci 78:550–558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huth EJ. 1999. Writing and publishing in medicine. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins
   Google Scholar
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. 2013. [Accessed 1 December 2014] Available from www.icmje.org/
   Google Scholar
• McGaghie WC. 2009. Scholarship, publication, and career advancement in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 43. Med Teach 31:574–590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGaghie WC, Bordage G, Shea JA. 2001. Problem statement, conceptual framework, and research question. Acad Med 76:923–924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan PP. 1985. Building a table: 2. CMAJ 133:839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. 2014. Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 89:1245–1251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsell G, Bligh J. 1999. AMEE Guide No. 17: Writing for journal publication. Med Teach 21:457–468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringsted C, Hodges B, Scherpbier A. 2011. ‘The research compass': An introduction to research in medical education: AMEE Guide no. 56. Med Teach 33:695–709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizkallah J, Sin DD. 2010. Integrative approach to quality assessment of medical journals using impact factor, eigenfactor, and article influence scores. PLoS One 5:e10204
   Google Scholar
• Schriger DL, Cooper RJ. 2001. Achieving graphical excellence: Suggestions and methods for creating high-quality visual displays of experimental data. Ann Emerg Med 37:75–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriger DL, Sinha R, Schroter S, Liu PY, Altman DG. 2006. From submission to publication: A retrospective review of the tables and figures in a cohort of randomized controlled trials submitted to the British Medical Journal. Ann Emerg Med 48:750–756, 756 e751-721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroter S, Tite L, Hutchings A, Black N. 2006. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors. JAMA 295:314–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. 2010. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 152:726–732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strunk W Jr, White EB. 2000. The elements of style. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
   Google Scholar
• Tekian A, Roberts T, Batty HP, Cook DA, Norcini J. 2014. Preparing leaders in health professions education. Med Teach 36:269–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufte ER. 2001. The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphic Press
   Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, for the STROBE Initiative. 2007. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 147:573–577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainer H. 1984. How to display data badly. Am Stat 38:137–147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wislar JS, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, Deangelis CD. 2011. Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: A cross sectional survey. BMJ 343:d6128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar